Home Blog Page 3

Kaya sinibak si Egay Erice, eto ang dahilan

Erice: “Mr. Chair, before the voting, may I withdraw my authorship of that bill?”
Adiong: “I am sorry? You are removing—”
Erice: “May I withdraw my authorship on the proposed bill?”
Adiong: “Okay. Granted. So we divide the house.”

Tinanggal si Congressman Erice sa kanyang pwesto matapos niyang kontrahin ang bersyon ng Kamara para sa anti-political dynasty bill. Pinuna ni Congressman Erice ang napiling working draft dahil mas pabor daw ito sa mga makapangyarihang pamilya sa politika.

Sa sobrang tindi ng tensyon, napilitan siyang bawiin ang kanyang suporta at pagiging co-author ng nasabing panukala. Ayon sa mga kaganapan, ang pagtayo niyang ito laban sa liderato ang naging mitsa ng kanyang pagkakatanggal sa posisyon.

Ginamit ng komite ang bersyon ng House Speaker bilang pangunahing basehan ng bagong batas para sa bansa. Katwiran ng mga opisyal, marami ang sumusuporta sa draft na ito kumpara sa ibang mga bersyon.

Pero para kay Erice, hindi ito ang tunay na diwa ng Konstitusyon dahil hinahayaan pa rin nito ang monopoly ng kapangyarihan. Naniniwala siyang dapat maging pantay ang pagkakataon ng bawat Pilipino na makapagsilbi sa ating gobyerno.

Ang Kontrobersyal na House Bill 6771

Noong kasagsagan ng hearing, nagkaroon pa ng problema sa mga microphone at ingay sa paligid ng silid. Sa kabila ng mga aberyang ito, pilit na ipinarating ni Erice ang kanyang matinding pagtutol sa proseso.

Hindi lang siya ang dismayado dahil sumunod din ang mga kinatawan mula sa Kabataan at Akbayan party-list. Pakiramdam nila ay minadali o “ni-railroad” ang pag-apruba sa dokumento nang walang sapat na malalim na debate.

Ipinunto naman ni Congressman Flores na may mga pagbabago namang ginawa sa mga seksyon ng bill. Ginawa ito upang isama ang ilang ideya mula sa bersyon ng ibang mga authors sa Kamara.

Ngunit hindi pa rin ito naging sapat para sa grupo nina Erice dahil sa limitadong sakop ng pagbabawal. Dahil dito, nagpasya ang mga minority members na iwanan ang pagiging co-author bago pa man matapos ang botohan.

Pagbawi ng Suporta ng mga Miyembro

Nagkaroon ng division sa loob ng house nang simulan na ang pagboto para sa substitute bill. Labing-isang miyembro ang unang nagtaas ng kamay hanggang umabot ito sa dalawampung boto pabor sa draft.

Samantala, apat na mambabatas lamang ang nanindigan at nagpahayag ng kanilang pagtutol sa nasabing mosyon. Dahil sa resulta, tuluyan nang naaprubahan ang unnumbered House bill bilang opisyal na substitute bill.

Matapos ang botohan, sunod-sunod na nagpahayag ng pagkadismaya ang mga kinatawan ng iba’t ibang sektor. Tahasang sinabi ng mga mambabatas na hindi na nila gustong maikabit ang kanilang pangalan sa dokumento. Iginiit nila na ang batas ay dapat magmula sa boses ng taumbayan at hindi sa iilan lamang. Ang ganitong mga hakbang ay nagpapakita ng lumalalang lamat sa pagitan ng minority at majority leaders.

Moro-morong Botohan

Ang pagtatapos ng hearing na ito ay nag-iwan ng malalim na sugat sa pagkakaisa ng mga mambabatas. Bagama’t naaprubahan ang committee report, nawalan naman ito ng suporta mula sa mga kilalang progresibong lider.

Patuloy ang laban para sa isang batas na tunay na magtatanggal sa mga dinastiya sa ating bansa. Mahalaga para sa mga kabataan na bantayan ang mga ganitong desisyon na humuhubog sa ating demokrasya.

Bilang mga susunod na lider, dapat nating maunawaan ang halaga ng paninindigan sa gitna ng pressure. Ang kwento ni Erice at ng kanyang mga kasama ay paalala na may presyo ang katapangan.

Pagkakatanggal sa Posisyon ni Egay Erice

Hindi nagtagal matapos ang kanyang matapang na pahayag, tinanggal si Erice bilang Senior Deputy Minority Leader ng Kamara. Pinalitan siya ni Rep. Leila de Lima matapos ihain ni Minority Leader Marcelino Libanan ang motion para sa kanyang pagpapalit.

>MORE: Bangayan ni Erice at Garin sa ‘interference’ ni Sandro Marcos

Naniniwala si Erice na ang tunay na dahilan ng kanyang pagkakaalis ay ang kanyang mga legitimate criticism laban sa administrasyon. Nabanggit din niya ang naging pressure mula kay Majority Leader Sandro Marcos na umano’y hindi nagustuhan ang kanyang mga banat.

Bagama’t may mga paliwanag na dati na itong plano, naging usap-usapan ang timing ng kanyang pagkakasibak.

Sagutan ni Rodante Marcoleta at DMW Hans Cacdac

“Mr. Secretary, ang sinasabi natin, this is not yet the worst scenario. March 2, nagbigay na sila. Nagpapagibik na sila. Napapasaklolo na sila. Out of 1,416, 60 ang na-repatriate natin. This is not the kind of response.” ~Rodante Marcoleta

Isang mainit na sagutan ang sumiklab sa Senado dahil sa mabagal na pag-uwi ng mga Pilipino sa Middle East. Pinuna ni Senator Rodante Marcoleta ang Department of Migrant Workers o DMW dahil sa napakababang bilang ng mga naiuuwing OFW.

Ayon sa datos, 60 lamang ang nakabalik sa Pilipinas mula sa mahigit isang libong humihiling ng saklolo. Dahil dito, tinawag ng senador na bagsak ang gobyerno sa unang test ng kanilang krisis-response.

Umabot na sa 1,416 ang mga Pilipinong nagnanais makaalis sa conflict zones noong simula ng Marso. Subalit pagkalipas ng apat na araw, tila hindi pa rin gumagalaw ang karamihan sa mga ito.

Iginiit ni Marcoleta na ang apat na porsyentong accomplishment ay hindi sapat para sa mga taong natatakot. Naniniwala ang senador na dapat ay mas mabilis ang aksyon kapag buhay na ang nakataya.

Makupad na Rescue

Sinagot naman ni DMW Secretary Hans Leo Cacdac ang mga naging patama ng senador sa nasabing briefing. Kinumpirma ni Cacdac na mabilis na tumataas ang bilang ng mga humihingi ng tulong sa kasalukuyan.

Sa katunayan, lumampas na sa dalawang libo ang live count ng mga OFW na gustong umuwi. Pinaliwanag ng kalihim na hindi madali ang mag-uwi ng tao sa gitna ng isang aktibong giyera.

Ang pagsasara ng airspace sa maraming bansa sa Middle East ang pangunahing dahilan ng pagkaantala. Dahil sarado ang mga paliparan, kailangang dumaan sa mga land border ang ating mga kababayan.

Halimbawa nito ang limang pilgrims na tumakas mula Tel Aviv patungong Egypt para lamang makauwi. Ang ganitong mga biyahe ay puno ng panganib at nangangailangan ng masusing pagpaplano at koordinasyon.

Land Crossing Laban sa Airspace Closure

Binigyang-diin ni Secretary Hans Leo Cacdac na ang kaligtasan ng mga Pilipino ang kanilang pinaka-prayoridad. Hindi raw nila maaaring madaliin ang pagbiyahe kung malalagay naman sa alanganin ang buhay ng marami.

>More: Marcoleta vs Hontiveros debateng mistress sa Senado

Gumagamit ang gobyerno ng land crossings sa United Arab Emirates at Israel na tumatagal ng ilang oras. Bukod dito, kailangan ding siguraduhin na mababa ang risk bago ilabas ang bawat grupo ng OFW.

Samantala, hindi kumbinsido si Senator Rodante Marcoleta sa paliwanag na ito dahil sa nararamdamang takot ng mga pamilya. Para sa kanya, ang tunay na test ng gobyerno ay kung paano reresponde sa isang worst-case scenario.

“Secretary, what I am presenting is a one-country approach. Hindi po tayo dapat mag-aaway-away dito. I am using this as a test kung gaano po ang level of response natin today. Wala pa po ‘yung worst-case scenario. Papaano kung magkaroon ng worst-case scenario?”, wika ng senador.

Tinanong niya kung ano ang gagawin ng ahensya kung biglang maging sampung beses ang dami ng hihingi ng tulong. Inihahanda na rin ng DMW ang hiling para sa supplemental budget na aabot sa bilyong piso.

Worst-Case Scenario

Tinantya ni Senator Sherwin Gatchalian na maaaring umabot sa 13 bilyong piso ang kakailanganing pondo para sa repatriation. Ang perang ito ay gagamitin para sa paglikas ng halos isang daang libong Pilipino sa rehiyon.

Kasama rito ang mga manggagawa, pilgrims, at pati na rin ang mga turistang naiipit sa tensyon. Layunin ng pondong ito na masigurong handa ang bansa kahit lumala pa ang gulo sa Middle East.

Sa kabila ng init ng diskusyon, nangako si Hans Leo Cacdac na susunod sila sa marching orders ng Pangulo. Sinabi niya na patuloy nilang bubuksan ang lahat ng posibleng daanan para sa mga gustong umuwi.

Noong Sabado lamang ay may mga karagdagang OFW na ang matagumpay na lumapag sa Pasay City. Patunay ito na kahit mahirap ang sitwasyon, patuloy ang pagkilos ng iba’t ibang ahensya ng gobyerno.

Kaligtasan ng OFW ang Pangunahing Priority

Sa huli, nanatiling matindi ang pressure sa DMW na pabilisin ang kanilang sistema sa gitna ng krisis. Ang sagutan nina Rodante Marcoleta at Hans Leo Cacdac ay nagpapakita lamang ng matinding pag-aalala para sa mga OFW.

Bagama’t may mga hamon sa airspace at logistika, kailangang maging adept ang bansa sa pagtugon sa panganib. Ang bawat segundo ay mahalaga para sa kaligtasan ng mga Pilipinong humihingi ngayon ng tulong.

“Kahit na po hindi niyo hingin ‘yung pasensya namin, hindi po kami rito ang problema. Ang response natin, the level of response is only 4%. Nagpapagibik po sila, napapasaklolo, natatakot po sila. ‘Yun po ‘yung dapat nating makita. Hindi ko po kayo sinisisi. Ang sinasabi ko lang, gawa tayo ng paraan kung papaano ‘yung takot po nila ay maibsan as soon as possible,” pahayag pa ni Marcoleta.

Pinay Nurse na Ginawaran ng Medalya ni Queen Elizabeth II

First published: October 12, 2020 Updated: March 8, 2026

Si Minerva “Minnie” Klepacz ay isang matapang na Pinay nurse at matron sa Royal Bournemouth Hospital sa United Kingdom na pinarangalan ni Queen Elizabeth II. Ito ang prestihiyosong British Empire Medal (BEM) noong 2020 dahil sa kanyang pambihirang dedikasyon sa gitna ng pandemya.

Si Minnie Klepacz ay nagsilbing matron sa Royal Bournemouth Hospital sa United Kingdom habang nananalasa ang COVID-19.

Sa kabila ng panganib, pinangunahan niya ang pag-aalaga sa mga healthcare workers at sa kanyang komunidad. Hinarap ni Minnie ang matinding lungkot dahil nawalan siya ng labing-isang kaibigan dahil sa nakamamatay na virus.

Sa halip na sumuko, ginamit niya ang sakit na ito upang lalong makatulong sa ibang tao. Nagsimula siyang gumawa ng mga paraan para manatiling ligtas ang kanyang mga kasamahan sa trabaho.

Bayani sa Gitna ng Krisis

Bilang lider ng Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) network, tiniyak ni Minnie ang kaligtasan ng lahat. Dahil dito, nagmungkahi siya ng mga risk assessment para malaman kung sino ang pinaka-bulnerable sa sakit.

Bukod sa mga pagsusuring ito, gumawa rin siya ng isang wellbeing hub sa loob ng ospital.

Ang nasabing pasilidad ay nakatulong sa mga pagod na staff upang makapagpahinga nang maayos. Dito ay nakakuha ng bagong lakas ang mga frontliners bago muling bumalik sa kanilang serbisyo.

Pagmamalasakit sa Kapwa Pinoy

Hindi lamang sa loob ng ospital nagpakita ng kabutihang-loob ang ating kababayang si Minnie. Personal siyang nagluto ng mga masusustansyang pagkain para sa mga kasamahang kagagaling lang sa intensive care.

Bukod sa pagluluto, tumulong din siya sa mga nangangailangan ng tulong sa paglipat ng bahay. Nag-organize rin siya ng mga virtual events para magbigay ng pag-asa sa mga Pilipinong natatakot.

Ang mga gawaing ito ay nagbigay ng kalinga sa mga taong malayo sa kanilang pamilya.

Sorpresa mula sa Queen

Dahil sa kanyang walang pagod na dedikasyon, nakatanggap siya ng email na hindi niya inaasahan. Noong una, akala ni Minnie ay spam lamang ito o kaya ay may nagawa siyang mali.

“What an incredibly proud day for Team (University Hospitals Dorset) – our brilliant matron Minnie has been recognized in the Queen’s Birthday Honors list and awarded a British Empire Medal,” inihayag ng UHD National Health Service Foundation Trust.

“I never thought in my wildest dreams that I’d get an award. I feel so privileged and honored,” ani niya.

“When I saw an email from the Cabinet Office, I was so worried, and thought I’d done something wrong. I plucked up the courage to read it again and responded asking if it was a spam email because I just couldn’t believe it. They told me it was true and then rang me to reassure me, I couldn’t believe it,”dagdag ni Klepacz.

Nag-alinlangan pa siyang basahin ang mensahe dahil sa sobrang gulat at kaba na naramdaman niya. Gayunpaman, napatunayang totoo ang balita nang tawagan siya mismo ng mga opisyal ng gobyerno.

Ginawaran siya ng prestihiyosong British Empire Medal (BEM) ni Queen Elizabeth II noong 2020.

Medalya para sa Pamilya

Labing-pitong taong gulang pa lamang si Minnie nang lisanin niya ang Manila para magtrabaho. Inialay niya ang kanyang nakuhang medalya sa lahat ng mga kasamahan niyang patuloy na lumalaban.

Dahil hindi siya makauwi agad, ipinadala niya ang kanyang parangal sa kanyang ina sa Pilipinas. Alam niyang matutuwa ang kanyang nanay na i-display ito sa kanilang sala gaya ng dati.

Ang kwento ni Minnie ay patunay na ang galing ng Pilipino ay nagniningning sa buong mundo. Tunay siyang inspirasyon sa mga kabataang nagnanais na magsilbi at tumulong sa kapwa.

“Growing up, my mom always used to display all our awards prominently in the lounge as she was so proud of us all. As I can’t visit my family right now, it’s only right that they have my medal,” sabi niya.

Dahil sa kanyang kabayanihan, kinilala siya bilang simbolo ng galing at malasakit ng mga Pilipinong nurse sa buong mundo, at inialay niya ang kanyang parangal sa kanyang pamilya sa Pilipinas bilang pasasalamat.

Alex Aela: ‘Face of the Philippines’

“Buong puso ko itong pinaglaban, hindi lang para sa sarili ko, kung hindi para sa kinabukasan ng Pilipinas.” ~Alex Eala

Si Alexandra “Alex” Maniego Eala ay isang tanyag na Filipinong propesyonal na manlalaro ng tennis na gumawa ng kasaysayan para sa bansa. Isinilang noong Mayo 23, 2005, siya ang kauna-unahang Filipino na nagwagi ng Junior Grand Slam singles title noong 2022. Dahil sa kaniyang galing, siya ay tinaguriang “Face of the Philippines” sa mundo ng tennis.

Noong Pebrero 2026, naabot niya ang kaniyang career-high ranking na World No. 31 sa Women’s Tennis Association (WTA). Ito ang pinakamataas na ranking na nakuha ng sinumang manlalarong Filipino sa kasaysayan ng Open Era. Si Alex ay nagsisilbing inspirasyon sa mga kabataang atleta dahil sa kaniyang disiplina at pagmamahal sa bayan.

Quick Facts

  • Full Legal Name: Alexandra Maniego Eala
  • Commonly Known Names: Alex Eala
  • Birth Date: May 23, 2005
  • Nationality: Filipino
  • Occupation: Professional Tennis Player
  • Years Active: 2020–Present
  • Known For: First Filipino Junior Grand Slam singles champion and highest-ranked Filipino player in history
  • Notable Works or Positions: Scholar at Rafa Nadal Academy; Brand Ambassador for Globe, BPI, Milo, Locally, and Nike

Kabataan at Edukasyon

Nagmula si Alex sa isang pamilya na kilala sa larangan ng palakasan sa Pilipinas. Ang kaniyang ina na si Rizza Maniego-Eala ay dating national swimmer at bronze medalist sa SEA Games. Ang kaniyang amang si Mike Eala ay isang negosyante at kaniyang naging sandigan sa mga laban. Tiyo rin niya ang dating commissioner ng PBA na si Noli Eala.

Nagsimulang humawak ng racket si Alex sa edad na apat sa Valle Verde Country Club. Ang kaniyang lolo na si Roberto “Bobby” Maniego ang nagsilbing unang coach nila ng kaniyang kuya na si Miko. Ayon sa pamilya, naging bonding activity nila ang tennis tuwing dulo ng linggo. Dito naitanim ang kaniyang hilig at determinasyon na maging isang mahusay na manlalaro.

Nag-aral siya sa Immaculate Conception Academy at Colegio San Agustin Makati bago pumunta sa Spain. Sa edad na 13, lumipat siya sa Mallorca para magsanay sa tanyag na Rafa Nadal Academy. Dito niya tinapos ang kaniyang high school habang hinahasa ang kaniyang talento sa tennis. Nagtapos siya sa nasabing academy noong taong 2023 nang may malaking pasasalamat.

Sa labas ng court, kilala si Alex bilang isang mapagkumbaba at masayahing “homebody”. Mahilig siyang manood ng comedy shows gaya ng Modern Family tuwing may bakanteng oras. Paborito rin niyang kainin ang pagkaing Pinoy gaya ng caldereta, kanin, at uminom ng milk tea. Kahit malayo sa Pilipinas, nananatili siyang malapit sa kaniyang pamilya at mga kaibigan.

Inilalarawan siya ng kaniyang mga coach bilang isang “tiger on court” dahil sa kaniyang tindi. Palagi siyang nagtatanong upang mas mapabuti ang kaniyang laro sa bawat ensayo. Mayroon siyang matibay na disiplina at hindi sumusuko kahit sa gitna ng mahihirap na laban. Ang kaniyang pagiging seryoso sa trabaho ay naging susi sa kaniyang mabilis na pag-unlad.

Ang Unang Filipino Junior Grand Slam Singles Champion

Ang unang malaking tagumpay ni Alex ay noong 2018 sa torneo na Les Petits As sa France. Ang panalong ito ang nagbigay sa kaniya ng scholarship sa Spain at unang wildcard sa Grand Slam. Sinundan ito ng kaniyang tagumpay sa girls’ doubles ng 2020 Australian Open at 2021 French Open. Ang mga titulong ito ang nagpakita na ang mga Filipino ay world-class sa tennis.

Noong 2022, sinungkit ni Alex ang korona sa US Open Junior girls’ singles division. Hindi siya natalo sa anumang set sa buong torneo, na nagpakita ng kaniyang pambihirang galing. Ito ay isang makasaysayang sandali dahil siya ang unang Filipino na nakakuha ng titulong ito. Matapos ang panalo, nagbigay siya ng speech sa Tagalog na nagpaiyak sa maraming fans.

Dahil sa tagumpay na ito, mabilis na nakilala si Alex sa buong mundo at sa bansa. Ang kaniyang mga laban ay palaging sinusubaybayan ng mga fans mula sa iba’t ibang bansa. Kinilala rin siya ng Philippine Sportswriters Association (PSA) bilang Athlete of the Year noong 2026. Ibinahagi niya ang parangal na ito sa Olympic champion na si Carlos Yulo.

Mga Mahalagang Kontribusyon

Marami nagawa si Alex Eala para itaas ang dangal ng sports sa Pilipinas sa pandaigdigang entablado:

Kasaysayan sa WTA at Grand Slam

Si Alex ang unang Filipina na nakarating sa semifinals ng isang WTA 1000 event sa Miami. Dito niya tinalo ang mga higante gaya nina Iga Swiatek, Madison Keys, at Jelena Ostapenko. Siya rin ang unang Filipino na pumasom sa Top 50 ng WTA singles rankings. Noong Setyembre 2025, nakuha niya ang kaniyang unang WTA 125 title sa Guadalajara Open.

Karangalan para sa National Team

Nagbigay si Alex ng maraming medalya para sa bansa sa mga regional na kompetisyon. Noong 2025, nagwagi siya ng gintong medalya sa women’s singles sa SEA Games sa Thailand. Nakakuha rin siya ng tatlong bronze medals sa 2021 SEA Games at dalawa sa 2022 Asian Games. Pinamunuan din niya ang Team Philippines sa Billie Jean King Cup para sa promosyon sa Group I.

Ang “Eala Effect” sa Philippine Tennis

Ang kaniyang kasikatan ay nagdulot ng pagdami ng mga Pilipinong nagnanais maglaro ng tennis. Sinabi ni Alex na pangarap niyang mapuno ang mga tennis court sa Pilipinas dahil sa kaniyang laro. Ayon sa kaniyang mga kaibigan, marami na ngayong tao ang naglalaro sa mga courts sa bansa. Binago niya ang tingin ng mundo sa kakayahan ng mga atletang Filipino sa larangan ng tennis.

Mga Kwento sa Buhay na Hindi Malilimutan

Ang Lolo bilang Unang Guro

Bago pumunta sa Spain, ang lolo ni Alex na si Bobby ang kaniyang tanging naging coach. Ayon kay Alex, nanonood sa YouTube at nagbabasa ng magazines ang kaniyang lolo para matuto. Tinuruan niya sina Alex at Miko ng disiplina at tamang mindset sa court mula pagkabata. Hanggang ngayon, itinuturing ni Alex ang kaniyang lolo bilang malaking bahagi ng kaniyang tagumpay.

Ang Practice kasama ang mga Tennis Icon

Isang pangarap ang natupad nang makasama ni Alex ang kaniyang idol na si Rafael Nadal. Noong Nobyembre 2025, muling humawak ng racket si Nadal matapos mag-retire para mag-practice kasama si Alex. Pinuri ng tennis legend ang sipag at magandang attitude ng batang Pinay sa loob ng court. Bukod kay Nadal, nakatanggap din siya ng papuri mula kina Novak Djokovic at Coco Gauff.

Speech sa Tagalog sa US Open

Matapos ang kaniyang panalo sa 2022 US Open, pinili ni Alex na magsalita sa wikang Tagalog. Sinabi niya na buong puso niyang ipinaglaban ang panalo para sa kinabukasan ng Pilipinas. Ang mensaheng ito ay para sa kaniyang mga kababayan sa Little Manila sa Queens at sa Pilipinas. Ito ay naging simbolo ng kaniyang matinding pagmamahal at dangal sa kaniyang pagiging Filipino.

Sampaguita Hair Tie sa Wimbledon

Para sa kaniyang debut sa Wimbledon noong 2025, binigyan siya ng Nike ng isang espesyal na hair tie. Ang hair tie na ito ay may disenyong sampaguita, na siyang national flower ng ating bansa. Isinuot niya ito bilang pagpapakita ng kaniyang mga ugat bilang isang tunay na Filipina. Ang bawat detalye ng kaniyang gamit ay madalas na may koneksyon sa kaniyang mahal na bayan.

Mga Hamon sa Buhay

Hindi naging madali ang paglalakbay ni Alex dahil kailangan niyang mamuhay malayo sa pamilya. Sa edad na 13, pinili niyang tumira sa Spain para lamang maabot ang kaniyang mga pangarap. Hinarap din niya ang matinding presyur mula sa publiko na palaging umaasang siya ay mananalo. May mga pagkakataon na nakaranas siya ng mga injuries at sakit gaya ng COVID-19.

Sa kabila nito, pinanatili ni Alex ang kaniyang tiwala sa sarili at sa kaniyang koponan. Ayon sa kaniya, kung hindi ka maniniwala sa iyong sarili ay wala kang pagkakataong magtagumpay. Ginagamit niya ang bawat pagkatalo bilang aral upang mas mapabuti pa ang kaniyang laro. Patuloy siyang nagsisikap araw-araw upang maging pinakamahusay na bersyon ng kaniyang sarili sa tennis.

Mga Kontrobersiya at Kritisismo

Bilang isang sikat na atleta, hindi naiwasan ni Alex ang mga intriga at batikos mula sa iba. Noong 2025, naging mainit na usapan ang kaniyang relasyon sa manlalaro ng tennis na si Coleman Wong. Gayunpaman, mabilis itong itinanggi ni Alex at sinabing sila ay matalik na magkaibigan lamang. Sinabi niya na nakapokus siya sa kaniyang karera at inspirasyon lamang ang turing sa kapwa atleta.

>More: Jose Rizal: Kabayanihan, Pag-ibig, at Sakripisyo

Nakaranas din si Alex ng kritisismo hinggil sa kaniyang “mental toughness” tuwing siya ay natatalo. Halimbawa nito ay ang kaniyang pagkatalo sa 2025 US Open laban sa mas mababang ranked na si Cristina Bucsa. Sinagot ni Alex ang mga kritiko sa pagsasabing marami silang hindi alam sa nangyayari sa likod ng court. Nanatili siyang matatag at ipinaliwanag na ang pagkatalo ay normal na bahagi ng buhay ng isang atleta.

Kilalanin si Alex

Si Alex Eala ay nananatiling malapit sa kaniyang pamilya sa kabila ng kaniyang paninirahan sa Spain,. Ang kaniyang mga magulang na sina Mike at Rizza ay nagsisilbing matibay na sandigan sa kaniyang karera. Sila ay palaging naroroon sa kaniyang mga mahahalagang laban upang magbigay ng moral na suporta. Ang kaniyang pamilya ang itinuturing niyang pinakamalaking inspirasyon at lakas sa bawat pagsubok.

Pagdating sa kaniyang “lovelife”, naging usap-usapan noong 2025 ang kaniyang ugnayan sa kapwa manlalaro na si Coleman Wong. Maraming fans ang nakapansin sa kanilang madalas na pagsasama sa mga social media posts. Gayunpaman, sa isang press conference noong Marso 2025, nilinaw ni Alex ang tunay na estado ng kanilang relasyon. Mariin niyang itinanggi ang mga bali-balita at sinabing “No, he is not” ang kaniyang boyfriend.

Sa kasalukuyan, wala pang kumpirmadong seryosong relasyon ang tennis star dahil nakapokus siya sa kaniyang propesyonal na karera. Binigyang-diin niya na ang kaniyang kapwa mga atleta sa Rafa Nadal Academy ay nagsisilbing inspirasyon lamang sa kaniya. Ayon sa kaniya, ang tagumpay ng mga taong matagal na niyang kilala ay nagbibigay sa kaniya ng higit na motibasyon. Sa ngayon, nananatiling pribado ang ibang aspeto ng kaniyang buhay pag-ibig.

Ang kaniyang pakikipag-ugnayan sa mga brand gaya ng BPI ay mayroon ding personal at sentimental na kuwento. Ayon kay Alex, doon mismo nagtagpo ang kaniyang mga magulang noong sila ay nagtatrabaho pa roon. Dahil dito, ang kaniyang mga endorsement ay hindi lamang simpleng trabaho kundi bahagi ng kasaysayan ng kaniyang pamilya. Ito ay nagpapakita ng kaniyang pagpapahalaga sa mga pinagmulan ng kaniyang mga magulang.

Bilang isang tao, si Alex ay inilalarawan bilang isang mapagkumbaba, disiplinado, at masayahing “homebody”. Mahilig siyang manood ng mga comedy movies gaya ng Modern Family at mga horror films tuwing bakante. Mahilig din siyang maglakbay sa iba’t ibang bansa at mamasyal sa mga beach tuwing may pagkakataon. Sa kabila ng kaniyang pandaigdigang katanyagan, nananatili siyang simple at malapit sa kaniyang mga kaibigan.

Sa usapin ng kalusugan, hinarap ni Alex ang ilang hamon gaya ng pagkakasakit ng COVID-19 noong simula ng 2022. Nakaranas din siya ng ilang minor injuries na panandaliang nagpabagal sa kaniyang kampanya sa mga torneo. Gayunpaman, ang kaniyang matinding disiplina sa fitness at nutrisyon ang nakatulong upang mabilis siyang makabangon. Ang kaniyang mental toughness ay nagsisilbi ring proteksyon laban sa matinding presyur ng kompetisyon.

The Eala Effect

Ang tagumpay ni Alex Eala ay nagdulot ng tinatawag na “Eala effect” sa larangan ng sports sa Pilipinas. Maraming kabataan ang nahikayat na humawak ng racket at subukan ang isport na tennis dahil sa kaniya,. Ayon sa kaniyang mga kaibigan, napapansin ang pagdami ng mga tao sa mga tennis court sa bansa. Ito ay isang patunay na ang kaniyang impluwensya ay ramdam na sa grassroots level,.

Sa kasaysayan, si Alex ang unang Filipino na nakapasok sa Top 50 ng WTA rankings sa Open Era. Binago niya ang imahe ng atletang Filipino na hindi na lamang limitado sa basketball o boxing. Pinatunayan niya na ang mga Pinoy ay world-class at kayang makipagsabayan sa mga powerhouse na bansa sa tennis. Ang kaniyang mga nakamit ay nagsisilbing bagong pamantayan para sa susunod na henerasyon ng mga manlalaro.

Timeline ng mga Kaganapan

  • 2005 – Isinilang sa Quezon City noong Mayo 23 kina Mike at Rizza Eala.
  • 2009 – Nagsimulang maglaro ng tennis sa edad na apat sa ilalim ng gabay ng kaniyang lolo.
  • 2018 – Nagwagi sa Les Petits As at lumipat sa Spain para sa Rafa Nadal Academy scholarship.
  • 2020 – Napanalunan ang kaniyang unang Junior Grand Slam doubles title sa Australian Open.
  • 2021 – Nasungkit ang ikalawang Junior Grand Slam doubles title sa French Open.
  • 2022 – Itinanghal na kauna-unahang Filipino Junior Grand Slam singles champion sa US Open.
  • 2025 – Umabot sa semifinals ng Miami Open at nakuha ang unang WTA 125 title sa Mexico.
  • 2026 – Naabot ang career-high ranking na World No. 31 noong Pebrero 23.

Awards at Honors

  • PSA Athlete of the Year (2026): Ang pinakamataas na parangal na ibinigay ng mga sportswriters sa Pilipinas.
  • Tatler Asia’s Most Influential: Kinilala bilang isa sa mga pinaka-maimpluwensyang tao sa Asya noong 2021.
  • Premios Tanglaw Trophy: Iginawad ng Philippine embassy sa Madrid para sa ugnayang Pilipinas at Spain.
  • SEA Games Gold Medal (2025): Nag-uwi ng ginto sa women’s singles matapos ang mahabang panahon.

Best Tennis Player

Ayon sa mga eksperto sa palakasan, si Alex Eala ang itinuturing na pinakadakilang manlalaro ng tennis sa Pilipinas. Ang kaniyang kakayahang magwagi laban sa mga Top 10 players ay hindi pa nararating ng sinumang manlalarong Filipino,. Binago niya ang pananaw ng mundo sa limitasyon ng mga atletang nagmumula sa Timog-Silangang Asya sa tennis. Ang kaniyang bawat palo ay simbolo ng modernong rebolusyon sa isport ng ating bansa.

Sinasabi rin ng mga kritiko na ang disiplina ni Alex sa Rafa Nadal Academy ang naging susi sa kaniyang tagumpay. Ang kaniyang istilo ng paglalaro bilang isang “aggressive baseliner” ay nagpapakita ng tapang at determinasyon. Bagama’t may mga puna sa kaniyang “serve”, ang kaniyang “return of serve” ay itinuturing nang world-class. Ang kaniyang legasiya ay hindi lamang ang mga titulo, kundi ang pag-asa na ibinigay niya sa kabataang Filipino.

Latest News

Sa kasalukuyan, si Alex Eala ay aktibong lumalaban sa Indian Wells Open sa United States ngayong Marso 2026. Matapos makakuha ng bye sa unang round, nakatakda niyang harapin ang pamilyar na kalaban na si Dayana Yastremska. Maraming fans ang umaasa na muli niyang mauulit ang kaniyang makasaysayang kampanya sa “Sunshine Swing”. Ang kaniyang kasalukuyang world ranking na No. 32 ay patuloy na nagbibigay ng karangalan sa bayan.

Bukod sa kaniyang mga laban, naging viral kamakailan ang kaniyang practice session kasama ang kaniyang idol na si Rafael Nadal. Isang taon matapos mag-retire, muling humawak ng racket si Nadal para lamang makasama ang batang pambato ng Pilipinas. Ang session na ito sa Spain ay nagpapakita ng malaking respeto ng tennis world sa kakayahan ni Alex. Patuloy din siyang nagsisilbing brand ambassador para sa mga malalaking kumpanya gaya ng Milo at Globe.

(This portion is developing…)

Mga Aral para sa Makabagong Henerasyon

Ang buhay ni Alex Eala ay isang mahalagang paalala na ang tagumpay ay nangangailangan ng matinding disiplina at sakripisyo. Sa edad na 13, pinili niyang mamuhay nang mag-isa sa ibang bansa para lamang maabot ang kaniyang pangarap. Ipinapakita nito na walang madaling daan patungo sa itaas at kailangan ang araw-araw na pagsisikap sa ensayo. Ang kaniyang “never give up” na mindset ay dapat tularan ng bawat kabataang nagnanais magtagumpay.

Bukod sa disiplina, itinuturo ni Alex ang kahalagahan ng pagmamahal sa bayan at pagiging makabayan. Sa bawat malaking panalo, palagi niyang ginagamit ang wikang Tagalog para pasalamatan ang kaniyang mga kababayan. Ipinapakita nito na kahit gaano na kalayo ang narating, hindi dapat kalimutan ang pinagmulan at ang bandilang kinakatawan. Ang pananalig sa sarili sa gitna ng mga kritisismo ay isang aral na magagamit sa anumang aspeto ng buhay.

Quotable Quotes

“I really had to give everything I got.”

“Buong puso ko itong pinaglaban, hindi lang para sa sarili ko, kung hindi para sa kinabukasan ng Pilipinas.”

“If you don’t believe, then you’ll have no chance at succeeding at all.”

“To be Filipino is something I take so much pride in.”

“I’ve only dreamed of making tennis grow in the Philippines, and now I’m bringing a whole new audience to tennis all around the world.”

“To me, success means continuously improving. Results are just the consequence of improving.”

“My main goal is simply to be the best version of myself.”

Trivia Questions

  1. Saang lungsod sa Pilipinas isinilang ang tennis star na si Alex Eala? A. Manila City B. Quezon City C. Makati City D. Cebu City
  2. Sino ang tanyag na tennis player na naging idol ni Alex at kaniyang nakasama sa practice? A. Rafael Nadal B. Roger Federer C. Novak Djokovic D. Serena Williams
  3. Anong kamay ang ginagamit ni Alex Eala sa pagpalo ng kaniyang tennis racket? A. Kanang kamay B. Parehong kamay C. Kaliwang kamay D. Wala sa nabanggit
  4. Sa anong edad nagsimulang matutong humawak ng racket at maglaro ng tennis si Alex? A. 10 taong gulang B. 8 taong gulang C. 6 na taong gulang D. 4 na taong gulang
  5. Ano ang paboritong lutong Pinoy ni Alex Eala na itinuturing niyang “comfort food”? A. Adobo B. Sinigang C. Caldereta D. Kare-kare
  6. Sino ang naging unang coach ni Alex at kaniyang kuya na si Miko noong sila ay bata pa? A. Ang kaniyang ama B. Ang kaniyang lolo na si Bobby C. Si Rafael Nadal D. Ang kaniyang guro sa paaralan
  7. Anong malaking Junior Grand Slam singles title ang napanalunan ni Alex noong taong 2022? A. US Open B. Wimbledon C. French Open D. Australian Open
  8. Sa anong bansa lumipat si Alex noong siya ay 13 taong gulang upang mag-aral sa isang tennis academy? A. United States B. France C. Spain D. Australia
  9. Anong parangal ang ibinigay ng PSA kay Alex noong Pebrero 2026 dahil sa kaniyang galing? A. Rookie of the Year B. Athlete of the Year C. Hall of Fame D. President’s Award
  10. Anong isport ang sinalihan ng ina ni Alex na si Rizza noong siya ay isang national athlete? A. Swimming B. Basketball C. Volleyball D. Gymnastics
  11. Noong Pebrero 2026, ano ang naabot na pinakamataas na World Ranking ni Alex sa tennis? A. No. 1 B. No. 10 C. No. 31 D. No. 50
  12. Sa anong kumpanya unang naging brand ambassador si Alex noong siya ay 8 taong gulang pa lamang? A. Smart B. Globe C. BPI D. Milo

Sources

Mga Tamang Sagot: 1. B, 2. A, 3. C, 4. D, 5. C, 6. B, 7. A, 8. C, 9. B, 10. A, 11. C, 12. B

Marcoleta vs Hontiveros debateng mistress sa Senado

“Eh papaano po kung tatlo yung mistresses? Sana po dito sa chamber natin, Mr. President, wala naman pong ganoon. Alam ko wala naman po yata. Sino pong magde-determine na merong cohabitation? Yung kapitbahay, yung barangay kapitan. Papaano kung sinabi naman ng isa, “Bakit kinakalat mong tayo?” “Eh hindi naman naging tayo ah.” Talagang mahirap talaga yata itong political dynasty.” ~Rodante Marcoleta

Mainit ang naging talakayan sa Senado nina Senator Risa Hontiveros at Senator Rodante Marcoleta tungkol sa mga “mistress” sa pulitika.

Sa ilalim ng bagong Anti-Political Dynasty Act, hindi na sapat na legal na asawa lamang ang bawal tumakbo sa pwesto. Isinasama na rin sa pagbabawal ang mga common-law partners o mga kinakasama kahit walang basbas ng kasal.

Layunin nito na pigilan ang mga pulitiko na gamitin ang kanilang mga partner para manatili sa kapangyarihan. Itong hakbang na ito ay para masiguro na lahat ay may pantay na pagkakataon sa serbisyo publiko.

Pagsasama ng Common-Law Partners sa Batas

Noong taong 1995, nahinto ang pagpasa ng katulad na batas dahil sa tanong tungkol sa mga mistress. Nagkaroon ng malaking pangamba noon na baka ang mga kinakasama ng pulitiko ang pumalit sa kanilang pwesto.

Ngunit sa bagong version ng bill, ituturing na silang mga “spouse” o asawa para sa layunin ng pagbabawal. Ibig sabihin, kung bawal ang legal na asawa, bawal na rin ang sinumang “cohabiting” partner ng kandidato.

Ito ay isang paraan upang hindi malusutan ng mga dinastiya ang mga regulasyon sa ating halalan. Sa ganitong sistema, magiging mas malinis ang labanan para sa mga nagnanais na tunay na magsilbi.

Pangamba ni Marcoleta

Ipinahayag ni Senator Marcoleta ang kanyang pangamba na ang pagtrato sa mga common-law partners bilang “spouses” sa ilalim ng Anti-Political Dynasty Act ay maaaring magbigay ng maling impresyon o “semblance of legality” sa mga relasyong hindi naman legal sa mata ng batas.

Para sa kanya, problematic ito dahil baka unwittingly na kilalanin ng publiko, lalo na ng mga kabataan, ang mga mistress bilang legal na asawa dahil lamang kasama sila sa depinisyon ng batas.

“So Mr. President, by treating the parties to such partnerships as spouses, it gives the impression or a semblance of legality by including them in the definition. Yun po yung medyo problematic para sa akin,” pahayag ni Marcoleta.

Bagama’t nilinaw ni Senator Risa Hontiveros na ang terminong ito ay ginagamit lamang upang “i-trigger” ang pagbabawal at hindi para gawing legal ang pagsasama, naniniwala si Marcoleta na mas mabuting alisin ang phrase na ito sa mismong depinisyon at ilagay na lamang sa ilalim ng mga partikular na sitwasyon upang maiwasan ang anumang kalituhan sa lipunan.

Paano Mapapatunayan ang Sikretong Relasyon?

Ang Commission on Elections (Comelec) ang may kapangyarihan na magdesisyon kung may relasyong nagaganap sa dalawang tao. Gagamit sila ng mga ebidensya gaya ng social media posts at mga dokumento na nagpapakita ng iisang address.

Kung ang isang partner ay nagpapakilala bilang “couple” sa publiko, sapat na itong batayan para sa Comelec. Bagama’t walang saktong bilang ng taon ng pagsasama, susuriin ng ahensya ang bawat sitwasyon nang maigi.

>MORE: Bangayan ni Erice at Garin sa ‘interference’ ni Sandro Marcos

Layunin nitong maging “workable” o epektibo ang batas sa kabila ng mga posibleng reklamo ng mga kandidato. Dahil dito, magiging mahirap na para sa mga pulitiko na itago ang kanilang mga de-facto relationship.

Ang Kwento ng Binasurang Panukala

Ibinahagi ni Senator Marcoleta ang isang mapait na karanasan noong siya ay nasa Mababang Kapulungan pa lamang ng Kongreso. Naghain siya noon ng sariling anti-dynasty bill ngunit binalewala lamang ito ng marami sa kanyang mga kasamahan.

Nginitian lang siya ng chairman ng komite at hindi man lang isinama sa agenda ang kanyang panukala. Ang kwentong ito ay nagpapakita kung gaano kahirap buwagin ang mga makapangyarihang pamilya sa ating bansa.

Kaya naman, pinagsisikapan nina Senator Risa Hontiveros na gawing mas matibay ang bagong batas na ito ngayon. Mahalaga ang bawat probisyon upang masigurong wala nang butas na maiiwan para sa mga abusadong pamilya.

Mabigat na Parusa sa mga Pasaway

Ang mga lalabag sa batas na ito ay haharap sa mabibigat na parusa sa ilalim ng ating election code. Maaaring makulong ng isa hanggang anim na taon ang sinumang mapapatunayang pilit na lumulusot sa mga pagbabawal.

Bukod sa pagkakakulong, mawawalan din sila ng karapatang humawak ng anumang posisyon sa gobyerno habambuhay. Kasama rin sa parusa ang mga taong magsasampa ng mga malisyosong reklamo laban sa kanilang mga katunggali.

Nais tiyakin ng ating mga senador na ang bawat maling gawain ay may katapat na disiplina. Ang bawat Pilipino ay dapat maging mapagmatyag upang mapangalagaan ang integridad ng ating bawat boto.

“Itong degree of prohibition, second degree, ay magbibigay daan po sa mabisa at saka doable nga po na imbestigasyon o review ng mga kandidato dahil madali naman pong magiging available yung mga birth certificates, marriage certificates, o kaya certificates of no marriage,” sabi ni Hontiveros.

Bagong Pag-asa para sa Lahat

Ang pagsasama sa mga mistress sa Anti-Political Dynasty Act ay isang matapang na hakbang para sa kinabukasan. Sa pamamagitan nito, mas maraming puwang ang mabubuksan para sa mga bagong lider na nais maglingkod.

Halos 30% ng mga posisyon sa gobyerno ang inaasahang mababakante kapag naipatupad na ang mahalagang batas na ito. Kailangan nating bantayan ang bawat butas na maaaring gamitin ng mga tradisyunal na pulitiko sa eleksyon.

1987 Philippine Constitution

(Free Pdf/Doc download files at the end)

PREAMBLE

We, the sovereign Filipino people, imploring the aid of Almighty God, in order to build a just and humane society, and establish a Government that shall embody our ideals and aspirations, promote the common good, conserve and develop our patrimony, and secure to ourselves and our posterity, the blessings of independence and democracy under the rule of law and a regime of truth, justice, freedom, love, equality, and peace, do ordain and promulgate this Constitution.

ARTICLE I – NATIONAL TERRITORY

The national territory comprises the Philippine archipelago, with all the islands and waters embraced therein, and all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdiction, consisting of its terrestrial, fluvial and aerial domains, including its territorial sea, the seabed, the subsoil, the insular shelves, and other submarine areas. The waters around, between, and connecting the islands of the archipelago, regardless of their breadth and dimensions, form part of the internal waters of the Philippines.

ARTICLE II – DECLARATION OF PRINCIPLES AND STATE POLICIES

PRINCIPLES

Section 1.

The Philippines is a democratic and republican State. Sovereignty resides in the people and all government authority emanates from them.

Section 2.

The Philippines renounces war as an instrument of national policy, adopts the generally accepted principles of international law as part of the law of the land and adheres to the policy of peace, equality, justice, freedom, cooperation, and amity with all nations.

Section 3.

Civilian authority is, at all times, supreme over the military. The Armed Forces of the Philippines is the protector of the people and the State. Its goal is to secure the sovereignty of the State and the integrity of the national territory.

Section 4.

The prime duty of the Government is to serve and protect the people. The Government may call upon the people to defend the State and, in the fulfillment thereof, all citizens may be required, under conditions provided by law, to render personal, military or civil service.

Section 5.

The maintenance of peace and order, the protection of life, liberty, and property, and promotion of the general welfare are essential for the enjoyment by all the people of the blessings of democracy.

Section 6.

The separation of Church and State shall be inviolable.

STATE POLICIES

Section 7.

The State shall pursue an independent foreign policy. In its relations with other states, the paramount consideration shall be national sovereignty, territorial integrity, national interest, and the right to self-determination.

Section 8.

The Philippines, consistent with the national interest, adopts and pursues a policy of freedom from nuclear weapons in its territory.

Section 9.

The State shall promote a just and dynamic social order that will ensure the prosperity and independence of the nation and free the people from poverty through policies that provide adequate social services, promote full employment, a rising standard of living, and an improved quality of life for all.

Section 10.

The State shall promote social justice in all phases of national development.

Section 11.

The State values the dignity of every human person and guarantees full respect for human rights.

Section 12.

The State recognizes the sanctity of family life and shall protect and strengthen the family as a basic autonomous social institution. It shall equally protect the life of the mother and the life of the unborn from conception. The natural and primary right and duty of parents in the rearing of the youth for civic efficiency and the development of moral character shall receive the support of the Government.

Section 13.

The State recognizes the vital role of the youth in nation-building and shall promote and protect their physical, moral, spiritual, intellectual, and social well-being. It shall inculcate in the youth patriotism and nationalism, and encourage their involvement in public and civic affairs.

Section 14.

The State recognizes the role of women in nation-building, and shall ensure the fundamental equality before the law of women and men.

Section 15.

The State shall protect and promote the right to health of the people and instill health consciousness among them.

Section 16.

The State shall protect and advance the right of the people to a balanced and healthful ecology in accord with the rhythm and harmony of nature.

Section 17.

The State shall give priority to education, science and technology, arts, culture, and sports to foster patriotism and nationalism, accelerate social progress, and promote total human liberation and development.

Section 18.

The State affirms labor as a primary social economic force. It shall protect the rights of workers and promote their welfare.

Section 19.

The State shall develop a self-reliant and independent national economy effectively controlled by Filipinos.

Section 20.

The State recognizes the indispensable role of the private sector, encourages private enterprise, and provides incentives to needed investments.

Section 21.

The State shall promote comprehensive rural development and agrarian reform.

Section 22.

The State recognizes and promotes the rights of indigenous cultural communities within the framework of national unity and development.

Section 23.

The State shall encourage non-governmental, community-based, or sectoral organizations that promote the welfare of the nation.

Section 24.

The State recognizes the vital role of communication and information in nation-building.

Section 25.

The State shall ensure the autonomy of local governments.

Section 26.

The State shall guarantee equal access to opportunities for public service and prohibit political dynasties as may be defined by law.

Section 27.

The State shall maintain honesty and integrity in the public service and take positive and effective measures against graft and corruption.

Section 28.

Subject to reasonable conditions prescribed by law, the State adopts and implements a policy of full public disclosure of all its transactions involving public interest.

ARTICLE III – BILL OF RIGHTS

Section 1.

No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor shall any person be denied the equal protection of the laws.

Section 2.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures of whatever nature and for any purpose shall be inviolable, and no search warrant or warrant of arrest shall issue except upon probable cause to be determined personally by the judge after examination under oath or affirmation of the complainant and the witnesses he may produce, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.

Section 3.

(1) The privacy of communication and correspondence shall be inviolable except upon lawful order of the court, or when public safety or order requires otherwise, as prescribed by law. (2) Any evidence obtained in violation of this or the preceding section shall be inadmissible for any purpose in any proceeding.

Section 4.

No law shall be passed abridging the freedom of speech, of expression, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances.

Section 5.

No law shall be made respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. The free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and worship, without discrimination or preference, shall forever be allowed. No religious test shall be required for the exercise of civil or political rights.

Section 6.

The liberty of abode and of changing the same within the limits prescribed by law shall not be impaired except upon lawful order of the court. Neither shall the right to travel be impaired except in the interest of national security, public safety, or public health, as may be provided by law.

Section 7.

The right of the people to information on matters of public concern shall be recognized. Access to official records, and to documents and papers pertaining to official acts, transactions, or decisions, as well as to government research data used as basis for policy development, shall be afforded the citizen, subject to such limitations as may be provided by law.

Section 8.

The right of the people, including those employed in the public and private sectors, to form unions, associations, or societies for purposes not contrary to law shall not be abridged.

Section 9.

Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation.

Section 10.

No law impairing the obligation of contracts shall be passed.

Section 11.

Free access to the courts and quasi-judicial bodies and adequate legal assistance shall not be denied to any person by reason of poverty.

Section 12.

(1) Any person under investigation for the commission of an offense shall have the right to be informed of his right to remain silent and to have competent and independent counsel preferably of his own choice. If the person cannot afford the services of counsel, he must be provided with one. These rights cannot be waived except in writing and in the presence of counsel. (2) No torture, force, violence, threat, intimidation, or any other means which vitiate the free will shall be used against him. Secret detention places, solitary, incommunicado, or other similar forms of detention are prohibited. (3) Any confession or admission obtained in violation of this or Section 17 hereof shall be inadmissible in evidence against him. (4) The law shall provide for penal and civil sanctions for violations of this Section as well as compensation to the rehabilitation of victims of torture or similar practices, and their families.

Section 13.

All persons, except those charged with offenses punishable by reclusion perpetua when evidence of guilt is strong, shall, before conviction, be bailable by sufficient sureties, or be released on recognizance as may be provided by law. The right to bail shall not be impaired even when the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus is suspended. Excessive bail shall not be required.

Section 14.

(1) No person shall be held to answer for a criminal offense without due process of law. (2) In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall be presumed innocent until the contrary is proved, and shall enjoy the right to be heard by himself and counsel, to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation against him, to have a speedy, impartial, and public trial, to meet the witnesses face to face, and to have compulsory process to secure the attendance of witnesses and the production of evidence in his behalf. However, after arraignment, trial may proceed notwithstanding the absence of the accused: Provided, that he has been duly notified and his failure to appear is unjustifiable.

Section 15.

The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended except in cases of invasion or rebellion, when the public safety requires it.

Section 16.

All persons shall have the right to a speedy disposition of their cases before all judicial, quasi-judicial, or administrative bodies.

Section 17.

No person shall be compelled to be a witness against himself.

Section 18.

(1) No person shall be detained solely by reason of his political beliefs and aspirations. (2) No involuntary servitude in any form shall exist except as a punishment for a crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted.

Section 19.

(1) Excessive fines shall not be imposed, nor cruel, degrading or inhuman punishment inflicted. Neither shall death penalty be imposed, unless, for compelling reasons involving heinous crimes, the Congress hereafter provides for it. Any death penalty already imposed shall be reduced to reclusion perpetua. (2) The employment of physical, psychological, or degrading punishment against any prisoner or detainee or the use of substandard or inadequate penal facilities under subhuman conditions shall be dealt with by law.

Section 20.

No person shall be imprisoned for debt or non-payment of a poll tax.

Section 21.

No person shall be twice put in jeopardy of punishment for the same offense. If an act is punished by a law and an ordinance, conviction or acquittal under either shall constitute a bar to another prosecution for the same act.

Section 22.

No ex post facto law or bill of attainder shall be enacted.

ARTICLE IV – CITIZENSHIP

Section 1.

The following are citizens of the Philippines: (1) Those who are citizens of the Philippines at the time of the adoption of this Constitution; (2) Those whose fathers or mothers are citizens of the Philippines; (3) Those born before January 17, 1973, of Filipino mothers, who elect Philippine Citizenship upon reaching the age of majority; and (4) Those who are naturalized in the accordance with law.

Section 2.

Natural-born citizens are those who are citizens of the Philippines from birth without having to perform any act to acquire or perfect their Philippine citizenship. Those who elect Philippine citizenship in accordance with paragraph (3), Section 1 hereof shall be deemed natural-born citizens.

Section 3.

Philippine citizenship may be lost or reacquired in the manner provided by law.

Section 4.

Citizens of the Philippines who marry aliens shall retain their citizenship, unless by their act or omission they are deemed, under the law to have renounced it.

Section 5.

Dual allegiance of citizens is inimical to the national interest and shall be dealt with by law.

ARTICLE V – SUFFRAGE

Section 1.

Suffrage may be exercised by all citizens of the Philippines, not otherwise disqualified by law, who are at least eighteen years of age, and who shall have resided in the Philippines for at least one year and in the place wherein they propose to vote, for at least six months immediately preceding the election. No literacy, property, or other substantive requirement shall be imposed on the exercise of suffrage.

Section 2.

The Congress shall provide a system for securing the secrecy and sanctity of the ballot as well as a system for absentee voting by qualified Filipinos abroad. The Congress shall also design a procedure for the disabled and the illiterates to vote without the assistance of other persons. Until then, they shall be allowed to vote under existing laws and such rules as the Commission on Elections may promulgate to protect the secrecy of the ballot.

ARTICLE VI – THE LEGISLATIVE DEPARTMENT

Section 1.

The legislative power shall be vested in the Congress of the Philippines which shall consist of a Senate and a House of Representatives, except to the extent reserved to the people by the provision on initiative and referendum.

Section 2.

The Senate shall be composed of twenty-four Senators who shall be elected at large by the qualified voters of the Philippines, as may be provided by law.

Section 3.

No person shall be a Senator unless he is a natural-born citizen of the Philippines and, on the day of the election, is at least thirty-five years of age, able to read and write, a registered voter, and a resident of the Philippines for not less than two years immediately preceding the day of the election.

Section 4.

The term of office of the Senators shall be six years and shall commence, unless otherwise provided by law, at noon on the thirtieth day of June next following their election. No Senator shall serve for more than two consecutive terms. Voluntary renunciation of the office for any length of time shall not be considered as an interruption in the continuity of his service for the full term of which he was elected.

Section 5.

(1) The House of Representatives shall be composed of not more than two hundred and fifty members, unless otherwise fixed by law, who shall be elected from legislative districts apportioned among the provinces, cities, and the Metropolitan Manila area in accordance with the number of their respective inhabitants, and on the basis of a uniform and progressive ratio, and those who, as provided by law, shall be elected through a party-list system of registered national, regional, and sectoral parties or organizations. (2) The party-list representatives shall constitute twenty per centum of the total number of representatives including those under the party list. For three consecutive terms after the ratification of this Constitution, one-half of the seats allocated to party-list representatives shall be filled, as provided by law, by selection or election from the labor, peasant, urban poor, indigenous cultural communities, women, youth, and such other sectors as may be provided by law, except the religious sector. (3) Each legislative district shall comprise, as far as practicable, contiguous, compact, and adjacent territory. Each city with a population of at least two hundred fifty thousand, or each province, shall have at least one representative. (4) Within three years following the return of every census, the Congress shall make a reapportionment of legislative districts based on the standards provided in this section.

Section 6.

No person shall be a Member of the House of Representatives unless he is a natural-born citizen of the Philippines and, on the day of the election, is at least twenty-five years of age, able to read and write, and, except the party-list representatives, a registered voter in the district in which he shall be elected, and a resident thereof for a period of not less than one year immediately preceding the day of the election.

Section 7.

The Members of the House of Representatives shall be elected for a term of three years which shall begin, unless otherwise provided by law, at noon on the thirtieth day of June next following their election. No Member of the House of Representatives shall serve for more than three consecutive terms. Voluntary renunciation of the office for any length of time shall not be considered as an interruption in the continuity of his service for the full term for which he was elected.

Section 8.

Unless otherwise provided by law, the regular election of the Senators and the Members of the House of Representatives shall be held on the second Monday of May.

Section 9.

In case of vacancy in the Senate or in the House of Representatives, a special election may be called to fill such vacancy in the manner prescribed by law, but the Senator or Member of the House of Representatives thus elected shall serve only for the unexpired term.

Section 10.

The salaries of Senators and Members of the House of Representatives shall be determined by law. No increase in said compensation shall take effect until after the expiration of the full term of all the Members of the Senate and the House of Representatives approving such increase.

Section 11.

A Senator or Member of the House of Representatives shall, in all offenses punishable by not more than six years imprisonment, be privileged from arrest while the Congress is in session. No Member shall be questioned nor be held liable in any other place for any speech or debate in the Congress or in any committee thereof.

Section 12.

All Members of the Senate and the House of Representatives shall, upon assumption of office, make a full disclosure of their financial and business interests. They shall notify the House concerned of a potential conflict of interest that may arise from the filing of a proposed legislation of which they are authors.

Section 13.

No Senator or Member of the House of Representatives may hold any other office or employment in the Government, or any subdivision, agency, or instrumentality thereof, including government-owned or controlled corporations or their subsidiaries, during his term without forfeiting his seat. Neither shall he be appointed to any office which may have been created or the emoluments thereof increased during the term for which he was elected.

Section 14.

No Senator or Member of the House of Representatives may personally appear as counsel before any court of justice or before the Electoral Tribunals, or quasi-judicial and other administrative bodies. Neither shall he, directly or indirectly, be interested financially in any contract with, or in any franchise or special privilege granted by the Government, or any subdivision, agency, or instrumentality thereof, including any government-owned or controlled corporation, or its subsidiary, during his term of office. He shall not intervene in any matter before any office of the Government for his pecuniary benefit or where he may be called upon to act on account of his office.

Section 15.

The Congress shall convene once every year on the fourth Monday of July for its regular session, unless a different date is fixed by law, and shall continue to be in session for such number of days as it may determine until thirty days before the opening of its next regular session, exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays. The President may call a special session at any time.

Section 16.

(1) The Senate shall elect its President and the House of Representatives, its Speaker, by a majority vote of all its respective Members. Each House shall choose such other officers as it may deem necessary. (2) A majority of each House shall constitute a quorum to do business, but a smaller number may adjourn from day to day and may compel the attendance of absent Members in such manner, and under such penalties, as such House may provide. (3) Each House may determine the rules of its proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly behavior, and, with the concurrence of two-thirds of all its Members, suspend or expel a Member. A penalty of suspension, when imposed, shall not exceed sixty days. (4) Each House shall keep a Journal of its proceedings, and from time to time publish the same, excepting such parts as may, in its judgment, affect national security; and the yeas and nays on any question shall, at the request of one-fifth of the Members present, be entered in the Journal. Each House shall also keep a Record of its proceedings. (5) Neither House during the sessions of the Congress shall, without the consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days, nor to any other place than that in which the two Houses shall be sitting.

Section 17.

The Senate and the House of Representatives shall each have an Electoral Tribunal which shall be the sole judge of all contests relating to the election, returns, and qualifications of their respective Members. Each Electoral Tribunal shall be composed of nine Members, three of whom shall be Justices of the Supreme Court to be designated by the Chief Justice, and the remaining six shall be Members of the Senate or the House of Representatives, as the case may be, who shall be chosen on the basis of proportional representation from the political parties and the parties or organizations registered under the party-list system represented therein. The senior Justice in the Electoral Tribunal shall be its Chairman.

Section 18.

There shall be a Commission on Appointments consisting of the President of the Senate, as ex officio Chairman, twelve Senators, and twelve Members of the House of Representatives, elected by each House on the basis of proportional representation from the political parties and parties or organizations registered under the party-list system represented therein. The chairman of the Commission shall not vote, except in case of a tie. The Commission shall act on all appointments submitted to it within thirty session days of the Congress from their submission. The Commission shall rule by a majority vote of all the Members.

Section 19.

The Electoral Tribunals and the Commission on Appointments shall be constituted within thirty days after the Senate and the House of Representatives shall have been organized with the election of the President and the Speaker. The Commission on Appointments shall meet only while the Congress is in session, at the call of its Chairman or a majority of all its Members, to discharge such powers and functions as are herein conferred upon it.

Section 20.

The records and books of accounts of the Congress shall be preserved and be open to the public in accordance with law, and such books shall be audited by the Commission on Audit which shall publish annually an itemized list of amounts paid to and expenses for each Member.

Section 21.

The Senate or the House of Representatives or any of its respective committees may conduct inquiries in aid of legislation in accordance with its duly published rules of procedure. The rights of persons appearing in, or affected by, such inquiries shall be respected.

Section 22.

The heads of departments may, upon their own initiative, with the consent of the President, or upon the request of either House, as the rules of each House shall provide, appear before and be heard by such House on any matter pertaining to their departments. Written questions shall be submitted to the President of the Senate or the Speaker of the House of Representatives at least three days before their scheduled appearance. Interpellations shall not be limited to written questions, but may cover matters related thereto. When the security of the State or the public interest so requires and the President so states in writing, the appearance shall be conducted in executive session.

Section 23.

(1) The Congress, by a vote of two-thirds of both Houses in joint session assembled, voting separately, shall have the sole power to declare the existence of a state of war. (2) In times of war or other national emergency, the Congress may, by law, authorize the President, for a limited period and subject to such restrictions as it may prescribe, to exercise powers necessary and proper to carry out a declared national policy. Unless sooner withdrawn by resolution of the Congress, such powers shall cease upon the next adjournment thereof.

Section 24.

All appropriation, revenue or tariff bills, bills authorizing increase of the public debt, bills of local application, and private bills, shall originate exclusively in the House of Representatives, but the Senate may propose or concur with amendments.

Section 25.

(1) The Congress may not increase the appropriations recommended by the President for the operation of the Government as specified in the budget. The form, content, and manner of preparation of the budget shall be prescribed by law. (2) No provision or enactment shall be embraced in the general appropriations bill unless it relates specifically to some particular appropriation therein. Any such provision or enactment shall be limited in its operation to the appropriation to which it relates. (3) The procedure in approving appropriations for the Congress shall strictly follow the procedure for approving appropriations for other departments and agencies. (4) A special appropriations bill shall specify the purpose for which it is intended, and shall be supported by funds actually available as certified by the National Treasurer, or to be raised by a corresponding revenue proposal therein. (5) No law shall be passed authorizing any transfer of appropriations; however, the President, the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and the heads of Constitutional Commissions may, by law, be authorized to augment any item in the general appropriations law for their respective offices from savings in other items of their respective appropriations. (6) Discretionary funds appropriated for particular officials shall be disbursed only for public purposes to be supported by appropriate vouchers and subject to such guidelines as may be prescribed by law. (7) If, by the end of any fiscal year, the Congress shall have failed to pass the general appropriations bill for the ensuing fiscal year, the general appropriations law for the preceding fiscal year shall be deemed re-enacted and shall remain in force and effect until the general appropriations bill is passed by the Congress.

Section 26.

(1) Every bill passed by the Congress shall embrace only one subject which shall be expressed in the title thereof. (2) No bill passed by either House shall become a law unless it has passed three readings on separate days, and printed copies thereof in its final form have been distributed to its Members three days before its passage, except when the President certifies to the necessity of its immediate enactment to meet a public calamity or emergency. Upon the last reading of a bill, no amendment thereto shall be allowed, and the vote thereon shall be taken immediately thereafter, and the yeas and nays entered in the Journal.

Section 27.

(1) Every bill passed by the Congress shall, before it becomes a law, be presented to the President. If he approves the same he shall sign it; otherwise, he shall veto it and return the same with his objections to the House where it originated, which shall enter the objections at large in its Journal and proceed to reconsider it. If, after such reconsideration, two-thirds of all the Members of such House shall agree to pass the bill, it shall be sent, together with the objections, to the other House by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two-thirds of all the Members of that House, it shall become a law. In all such cases, the votes of each House shall be determined by yeas or nays, and the names of the Members voting for or against shall be entered in its Journal. The President shall communicate his veto of any bill to the House where it originated within thirty days after the date of receipt thereof, otherwise, it shall become a law as if he had signed it. (2) The President shall have the power to veto any particular item or items in an appropriation, revenue, or tariff bill, but the veto shall not affect the item or items to which he does not object.

Section 28.

(1) The rule of taxation shall be uniform and equitable. The Congress shall evolve a progressive system of taxation. (2) The Congress may, by law, authorize the President to fix within specified limits, and subject to such limitations and restrictions as it may impose, tariff rates, import and export quotas, tonnage and wharfage dues, and other duties or imposts within the framework of the national development program of the Government. (3) Charitable institutions, churches and personages or convents appurtenant thereto, mosques, non-profit cemeteries, and all lands, buildings, and improvements, actually, directly, and exclusively used for religious, charitable, or educational purposes shall be exempt from taxation. (4) No law granting any tax exemption shall be passed without the concurrence of a majority of all the Members of the Congress.

Section 29.

(1) No money shall be paid out of the Treasury except in pursuance of an appropriation made by law. (2) No public money or property shall be appropriated, applied, paid, or employed, directly or indirectly, for the use, benefit, or support of any sect, church, denomination, sectarian institution, or system of religion, or of any priest, preacher, minister, other religious teacher, or dignitary as such, except when such priest, preacher, minister, or dignitary is assigned to the armed forces, or to any penal institution, or government orphanage or leprosarium. (3) All money collected on any tax levied for a special purpose shall be treated as a special fund and paid out for such purpose only. If the purpose for which a special fund was created has been fulfilled or abandoned, the balance, if any, shall be transferred to the general funds of the Government.

Section 30.

No law shall be passed increasing the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court as provided in this Constitution without its advice and concurrence.

Section 31.

No law granting a title of royalty or nobility shall be enacted.

Section 32.

The Congress shall, as early as possible, provide for a system of initiative and referendum, and the exceptions therefrom, whereby the people can directly propose and enact laws or approve or reject any act or law or part thereof passed by the Congress or local legislative body after the registration of a petition therefor signed by at least ten per centum of the total number of registered voters, of which every legislative district must be represented by at least three per centum of the registered voters thereof.

ARTICLE VII – EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT

Section 1.

The executive power shall be vested in the President of the Philippines.

Section 2.

No person may be elected President unless he is a natural-born citizen of the Philippines, a registered voter, able to read and write, at least forty years of age on the day of the election, and a resident of the Philippines for at least ten years immediately preceding such election.

Section 3.

There shall be a Vice-President who shall have the same qualifications and term of office and be elected with, and in the same manner, as the President. He may be removed from office in the same manner as the President. The Vice-President may be appointed as a Member of the Cabinet. Such appointment requires no confirmation.

Section 4.

The President and the Vice-President shall be elected by direct vote of the people for a term of six years which shall begin at noon on the thirtieth day of June next following the day of the election and shall end at noon of the same date, six years thereafter. The President shall not be eligible for any re-election. No person who has succeeded as President and has served as such for more than four years shall be qualified for election to the same office at any time. No Vice-President shall serve for more than two successive terms. Voluntary renunciation of the office for any length of time shall not be considered as an interruption in the continuity of the service for the full term for which he was elected. Unless otherwise provided by law, the regular election for President and Vice-President shall be held on the second Monday of May. The returns of every election for President and Vice-President, duly certified by the board of canvassers of each province or city, shall be transmitted to the Congress, directed to the President of the Senate. Upon receipt of the certificates of canvass, the President of the Senate shall, not later than thirty days after the day of the election, open all the certificates in the presence of the Senate and the House of Representatives in joint public session, and the Congress, upon determination of the authenticity and due execution thereof in the manner provided by law, canvass the votes. The person having the highest number of votes shall be proclaimed elected, but in case two or more shall have an equal and highest number of votes, one of them shall forthwith be chosen by the vote of a majority of all the Members of both Houses of the Congress, voting separately. The Congress shall promulgate its rules for the canvassing of the certificates. The Supreme Court, sitting en banc, shall be the sole judge of all contests relating to the election, returns, and qualifications of the President or Vice-President, and may promulgate its rules for the purpose.

Section 5.

Before they enter on the execution of their office, the President, the Vice-President, or the Acting President shall take the following oath or affirmation: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully and conscientiously fulfill my duties as President (or Vice-President or Acting President) of the Philippines, preserve and defend its Constitution, execute its laws, do justice to every man, and consecrate myself to the service of the Nation. So help me God.” (In case of affirmation, last sentence will be omitted).

Section 6.

The President shall have an official residence. The salaries of the President and Vice-President shall be determined by law and shall not be decreased during their tenure. No increase in said compensation shall take effect until after the expiration of the term of the incumbent during which such increase was approved. They shall not receive during their tenure any other emolument from the Government or any other source.

Section 7.

The President-elect and the Vice President-elect shall assume office at the beginning of their terms. If the President-elect fails to qualify, the Vice President-elect shall act as President until the President-elect shall have qualified. If a President shall not have been chosen, the Vice President-elect shall act as President until a President shall have been chosen and qualified. If at the beginning of the term of the President, the President-elect shall have died or shall have become permanently disabled, the Vice President-elect shall become President. Where no President and Vice-President shall have been chosen or shall have qualified, or where both shall have died or become permanently disabled, the President of the Senate or, in case of his inability, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, shall act as President until a President or a Vice-President shall have been chosen and qualified. The Congress shall, by law, provide for the manner in which one who is to act as President shall be selected until a President or a Vice-President shall have qualified, in case of death, permanent disability, or inability of the officials mentioned in the next preceding paragraph.

Section 8.

In case of death, permanent disability, removal from office, or resignation of the President, the Vice-President shall become the President to serve the unexpired term. In case of death, permanent disability, removal from office, or resignation of both the President and Vice-President, the President of the Senate or, in case of his inability, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, shall then act as President until the President or Vice-President shall have been elected and qualified. The Congress shall, by law, provide who shall serve as President in case of death, permanent disability, or resignation of the Acting President. He shall serve until the President or the Vice-President shall have been elected and qualified, and be subject to the same restrictions of powers and disqualifications as the Acting President.

Section 9.

Whenever there is a vacancy in the Office of the Vice-President during the term for which he was elected, the President shall nominate a Vice-President from among the Members of the Senate and the House of Representatives who shall assume office upon confirmation by a majority vote of all the Members of both Houses of the Congress, voting separately.

Section 10.

The Congress shall, at ten o’clock in the morning of the third day after the vacancy in the offices of the President and Vice-President occurs, convene in accordance with its rules without need of a call and within seven days, enact a law calling for a special election to elect a President and a Vice-President to be held not earlier than forty-five days nor later than sixty days from the time of such call. The bill calling such special election shall be deemed certified under paragraph 2, Section 26, Article VI of this Constitution and shall become law upon its approval on third reading by the Congress. Appropriations for the special election shall be charged against any current appropriations and shall be exempt from the requirements of paragraph 4, Section 25, Article VI of this Constitution. The convening of the Congress cannot be suspended nor the special election postponed. No special election shall be called if the vacancy occurs within eighteen months before the date of the next presidential election.

Section 11.

Whenever the President transmits to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice-President as Acting President. Whenever a majority of all the Members of the Cabinet transmit to the President of the Senate and to the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice-President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President. Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President of the Senate and to the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall reassume the powers and duties of his office. Meanwhile, should a majority of all the Members of the Cabinet transmit within five days to the President of the Senate and to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Congress shall decide the issue. For that purpose, the Congress shall convene, if it is not in session, within forty-eight hours, in accordance with its rules and without need of call. If the Congress, within ten days after receipt of the last written declaration, or, if not in session, within twelve days after it is required to assemble, determines by a two-thirds vote of both Houses, voting separately, that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice-President shall act as President; otherwise, the President shall continue exercising the powers and duties of his office.

Section 12.

In case of serious illness of the President, the public shall be informed of the state of his health. The members of the Cabinet in charge of national security and foreign relations and the Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces of the Philippines, shall not be denied access to the President during such illness.

Section 13.

The President, Vice-President, the Members of the Cabinet, and their deputies or assistants shall not, unless otherwise provided in this Constitution, hold any other office or employment during their tenure. They shall not, during said tenure, directly or indirectly, practice any other profession, participate in any business, or be financially interested in any contract with, or in any franchise, or special privilege granted by the Government or any subdivision, agency, or instrumentality thereof, including government-owned or controlled corporations or their subsidiaries. They shall strictly avoid conflict of interest in the conduct of their office. The spouse and relatives by consanguinity or affinity within the fourth civil degree of the President shall not, during his tenure, be appointed as Members of the Constitutional Commissions, or the Office of the Ombudsman, or as Secretaries, Undersecretaries, chairmen or heads of bureaus or offices, including government-owned or controlled corporations and their subsidiaries.

Section 14.

Appointments extended by an Acting President shall remain effective, unless revoked by the elected President, within ninety days from his assumption or reassumption of office.

Section 15.

Two months immediately before the next presidential elections and up to the end of his term, a President or Acting President shall not make appointments, except temporary appointments to executive positions when continued vacancies therein will prejudice public service or endanger public safety.

Section 16.

The President shall nominate and, with the consent of the Commission on Appointments, appoint the heads of the executive departments, ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, or officers of the armed forces from the rank of colonel or naval captain, and other officers whose appointments are vested in him in this Constitution. He shall also appoint all other officers of the Government whose appointments are not otherwise provided for by law, and those whom he may be authorized by law to appoint. The Congress may, by law, vest the appointment of other officers lower in rank in the President alone, in the courts, or in the heads of departments, agencies, commissions, or boards. The President shall have the power to make appointments during the recess of the Congress, whether voluntary or compulsory, but such appointments shall be effective only until disapproved by the Commission on Appointments or until the next adjournment of the Congress.

Section 17.

The President shall have control of all the executive departments, bureaus, and offices. He shall ensure that the laws be faithfully executed.

Section 18.

The President shall be the Commander-in-Chief of all armed forces of the Philippines and whenever it becomes necessary, he may call out such armed forces to prevent or suppress lawless violence, invasion or rebellion. In case of invasion or rebellion, when the public safety requires it, he may, for a period not exceeding sixty days, suspend the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus or place the Philippines or any part thereof under martial law. Within forty-eight hours from the proclamation of martial law or the suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus, the President shall submit a report in person or in writing to the Congress. The Congress, voting jointly, by a vote of at least a majority of all its Members in regular or special session, may revoke such proclamation or suspension, which revocation shall not be set aside by the President. Upon the initiative of the President, the Congress may, in the same manner, extend such proclamation or suspension for a period to be determined by the Congress, if the invasion or rebellion shall persist and public safety requires it. The Congress, if not in session, shall, within twenty-four hours following such proclamation or suspension, convene in accordance with its rules without need of a call. The Supreme Court may review, in an appropriate proceeding filed by any citizen, the sufficiency of the factual basis of the proclamation of martial law or the suspension of the privilege of the writ or the extension thereof, and must promulgate its decision thereon within thirty days from its filing. A state of martial law does not suspend the operation of the Constitution, nor supplant the functioning of the civil courts or legislative assemblies, nor authorize the conferment of jurisdiction on military courts and agencies over civilians where civil courts are able to function, nor automatically suspend the privilege of the writ. The suspension of the privilege of the writ shall apply only to persons judicially charged for rebellion or offenses inherent in or directly connected with invasion. During the suspension of the privilege of the writ, any person thus arrested or detained shall be judicially charged within three days, otherwise he shall be released.

Section 19.

Except in cases of impeachment, or as otherwise provided in this Constitution, the President may grant reprieves, commutations, and pardons, and remit fines and forfeitures, after conviction by final judgment. He shall also have the power to grant amnesty with the concurrence of a majority of all the Members of the Congress.

Section 20.

The President may contract or guarantee foreign loans on behalf of the Republic of the Philippines with the prior concurrence of the Monetary Board, and subject to such limitations as may be provided by law. The Monetary Board shall, within thirty days from the end of every quarter of the calendar year, submit to the Congress a complete report of its decision on applications for loans to be contracted or guaranteed by the Government or government-owned and controlled corporations which would have the effect of increasing the foreign debt, and containing other matters as may be provided by law.

Section 21.

No treaty or international agreement shall be valid and effective unless concurred in by at least two-thirds of all the Members of the Senate.

Section 22.

The President shall submit to the Congress, within thirty days from the opening of every regular session as the basis of the general appropriations bill, a budget of expenditures and sources of financing, including receipts from existing and proposed revenue measures.

Section 23.

The President shall address the Congress at the opening of its regular session. He may also appear before it at any other time.

ARTICLE VIII – JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

Section 1.

The judicial power shall be vested in one Supreme Court and in such lower courts as may be established by law. Judicial power includes the duty of the courts of justice to settle actual controversies involving rights which are legally demandable and enforceable, and to determine whether or not there has been a grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction on the part of any branch or instrumentality of the Government.

Section 2.

The Congress shall have the power to define, prescribe, and apportion the jurisdiction of the various courts but may not deprive the Supreme Court of its jurisdiction over cases enumerated in Section 5 hereof. No law shall be passed reorganizing the Judiciary when it undermines the security of tenure of its Members.

Section 3.

The Judiciary shall enjoy fiscal autonomy. Appropriations for the Judiciary may not be reduced by the legislature below the amount appropriated for the previous year and, after approval, shall be automatically and regularly released.

Section 4.

(1) The Supreme Court shall be composed of a Chief Justice and fourteen Associate Justices. It may sit en banc or in its discretion, in division of three, five, or seven Members. Any vacancy shall be filled within ninety days from the occurrence thereof. (2) All cases involving the constitutionality of a treaty, international or executive agreement, or law, which shall be heard by the Supreme Court en banc, and all other cases which under the Rules of Court are required to be heard en banc, including those involving the constitutionality, application, or operation of presidential decrees, proclamations, orders, instructions, ordinances, and other regulations, shall be decided with the concurrence of a majority of the Members who actually took part in the deliberations on the issues in the case and voted thereon. (3) Cases or matters heard by a division shall be decided or resolved with the concurrence of a majority of the Members who actually took part in the deliberations on the issues in the case and voted thereon, and in no case without the concurrence of at least three of such Members. When the required number is not obtained, the case shall be decided en banc: Provided, that no doctrine or principle of law laid down by the court in a decision rendered en banc or in division may be modified or reversed except by the court sitting en banc.

Section 5.

The Supreme Court shall have the following powers: (1) Exercise original jurisdiction over cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and over petitions for certiorari, prohibition, mandamus, quo warranto, and habeas corpus. (2) Review, revise, reverse, modify, or affirm on appeal or certiorari, as the law or the Rules of Court may provide, final judgments and orders of lower courts in: (a) All cases in which the constitutionality or validity of any treaty, international or executive agreement, law, presidential decree, proclamation, order, instruction, ordinance, or regulation is in question; (b) All cases involving the legality of any tax, impost, assessment, or toll, or any penalty imposed in relation thereto; (c) All cases in which the jurisdiction of any lower court is in issue; (d) All criminal cases in which the penalty imposed is reclusion perpetua or higher; (e) All cases in which only an error or question of law is involved. (3) Assign temporarily judges of lower courts to other stations as public interest may require. Such temporary assignment shall not exceed six months without the consent of the judge concerned. (4) Order a change of venue or place of trial to avoid a miscarriage of justice. (5) Promulgate rules concerning the protection and enforcement of constitutional rights, pleading, practice, and procedure in all courts, the admission to the practice of law, the integrated bar, and legal assistance to the under-privileged. Such rules shall provide a simplified and inexpensive procedure for the speedy disposition of cases, shall be uniform for all courts of the same grade, and shall not diminish, increase, or modify substantive rights. Rules of procedure of special courts and quasi-judicial bodies shall remain effective unless disapproved by the Supreme Court. (6) Appoint all officials and employees of the Judiciary in accordance with the Civil Service Law.

Section 6.

The Supreme Court shall have administrative supervision over all courts and the personnel thereof.

Section 7.

(1) No person shall be appointed Member of the Supreme Court or any lower collegiate court unless he is a natural-born citizen of the Philippines. A Member of the Supreme Court must be at least forty years of age, and must have been for fifteen years or more, a judge of a lower court or engaged in the practice of law in the Philippines. (2) The Congress shall prescribe the qualifications of judges of lower courts, but no person may be appointed judge thereof unless he is a citizen of the Philippines and a member of the Philippine Bar. (3) A Member of the Judiciary must be a person of proven competence, integrity, probity, and independence.

Section 8.

(1) A Judicial and Bar Council is hereby created under the supervision of the Supreme Court composed of the Chief Justice as ex officio Chairman, the Secretary of Justice, and a representative of the Congress as ex officio Members, a representative of the Integrated Bar, a professor of law, a retired Member of the Supreme Court, and a representative of the private sector. (2) The regular members of the Council shall be appointed by the President for a term of four years with the consent of the Commission on Appointments. Of the Members first appointed, the representative of the Integrated Bar shall serve for four years, the professor of law for three years, the retired Justice for two years, and the representative of the private sector for one year. (3) The Clerk of the Supreme Court shall be the Secretary ex officio of the Council and shall keep a record of its proceedings. (4) The regular Members of the Council shall receive such emoluments as may be determined by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court shall provide in its annual budget the appropriations for the Council. (5) The Council shall have the principal function of recommending appointees to the judiciary. It may exercise such other functions and duties as the Supreme Court may assign to it.

Section 9.

The Members of the Supreme Court and judges of lower courts shall be appointed by the President from a list of at least three nominees preferred by the Judicial and Bar Council for every vacancy. Such appointments need no confirmation. For the lower courts, the President shall issue the appointment within ninety days from the submission of the list.

Section 10.

The salary of the Chief Justice and of the Associate Justices of the Supreme Court, and of judges of lower courts shall be fixed by law. During the continuance in office, their salary shall not be decreased.

Section 11.

The Members of the Supreme Court and judges of the lower court shall hold office during good behavior until they reach the age of seventy years or become incapacitated to discharge the duties of their office. The Supreme Court en banc shall have the power to discipline judges of lower courts, or order their dismissal by a vote of majority of the Members who actually took part in the deliberations on the issues in the case and voted in thereon.

Section 12.

The Members of the Supreme Court and of other courts established by law shall not be designated to any agency performing quasi-judicial or administrative function.

Section 13.

The conclusions of the Supreme Court in any case submitted to it for the decision en banc or in division shall be reached in consultation before the case is assigned to a Member for the writing of the opinion of the Court. A certification to this effect signed by the Chief Justice shall be issued and a copy thereof attached to the record of the case and served upon the parties. Any Member who took no part, or dissented, or abstained from a decision or resolution must state the reason therefor. The same requirements shall be observed by all lower collegiate court.

Section 14.

No decision shall be rendered by any court without expressing therein clearly and distinctly the facts and the law on which it is based. No petition for review or motion for reconsideration of a decision of the court shall be refused due course or denied without stating the legal basis therefor.

Section 15.

(1) All cases or matters filed after the effectivity of this Constitution must be decided or resolved within twenty-four months from date of submission for the Supreme Court, and, unless reduced by the Supreme Court, twelve months for all lower collegiate courts, and three months for all other lower courts. (2) A case or matter shall be deemed submitted for decision or resolution upon the filing of the last pleading, brief, or memorandum required by the Rules of Court or by the court itself. (3) Upon the expiration of the corresponding period, a certification to this effect signed by the Chief Justice or the presiding judge shall forthwith be issued and a copy thereof attached to the record of the case or matter, and served upon the parties. The certification shall state why a decision or resolution has not been rendered or issued within said period. (4) Despite the expiration of the applicable mandatory period, the court, without prejudice to such responsibility as may have been incurred in consequence thereof, shall decide or resolve the case or matter submitted thereto for determination, without further delay.

Section 16.

The Supreme Court shall, within thirty days from the opening of each regular session of the Congress, submit to the President and the Congress an annual report on the operations and activities of the Judiciary.

ARTICLE IX – CONSTITUTIONAL COMMISSIONS

A. COMMON PROVISIONS

Section 1.

The Constitutional Commissions, which shall be independent, are the Civil Service Commission, the Commission on Elections, and the Commission on Audit.

Section 2.

No member of a Constitutional Commission shall, during his tenure, hold any other office or employment. Neither shall he engage in the practice of any profession or in the active management or control of any business which, in any way, may be affected by the functions of his office, nor shall he be financially interested, directly or indirectly, in any contract with, or in any franchise or privilege granted by the Government, any of its subdivisions, agencies, or instrumentalities, including government-owned or controlled corporations or their subsidiaries.

Section 3.

The salary of the Chairman and the Commissioners shall be fixed by law and shall not be decreased during their tenure.

Section 4.

The Constitutional Commissions shall appoint their officials and employees in accordance with law.

Section 5.

The Commission shall enjoy fiscal autonomy. Their approved annual appropriations shall be automatically and regularly released.

Section 6.

Each Commission en banc may promulgate its own rules concerning pleadings and practice before it or before any of its offices. Such rules, however, shall not diminish, increase, or modify substantive rights.

Section 7.

Each Commission shall decide by a majority vote of all its Members, any case or matter brought before it within sixty days from the date of its submission for decision or resolution. A case or matter is deemed submitted for decision or resolution upon the filing of the last pleading, brief, or memorandum required by the rules of the Commission or by the Commission itself. Unless otherwise provided by this Constitution or by law, any decision, order, or ruling of each Commission may be brought to the Supreme Court on certiorari by the aggrieved party within thirty days from receipt of a copy thereof.

Section 8.

Each Commission shall perform such other functions as may be provided by law.

B. THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION

Section 1.

(1) The civil service shall be administered by the Civil Service Commission composed of a Chairman and two Commissioners who shall be natural-born citizens of the Philippines and, at the time of their appointment, at least thirty-five years of age, with proven capacity for public administration, and must not have been candidates for any elective position in the elections immediately preceding their appointment. (2) The Chairman and the Commissioners shall be appointed by the President with the consent of the Commission on Appointments for a term of seven years without reappointment. Of those first appointed, the Chairman shall hold office for seven years, a Commissioner for five years, and another Commissioner for three years, without reappointment. Appointment to any vacancy shall be only for the unexpired term of the predecessor. In no case shall any Member be appointed or designated in a temporary or acting capacity.

Section 2.

(1) The civil service embraces all branches, subdivisions, instrumentalities, and agencies of the Government, including government-owned or controlled corporations with original charters. (2) Appointments in the civil service shall be made only according to merit and fitness to be determined, as far as practicable, and, except to positions which are policy-determining, primarily confidential, or highly technical, by competitive examination. (3) No officer or employee of the civil service shall be removed or suspended except for cause provided by law. (4) No officer or employee in the civil service shall engage, directly or indirectly, in any electioneering or partisan political campaign. (5) The right to self-organization shall not be denied to government employees. (6) Temporary employees of the Government shall be given such protection as may be provided by law.

Section 3.

The Civil Service Commission, as the central personnel agency of the Government, shall establish a career service and adopt measures to promote morale, efficiency, integrity, responsiveness, progressiveness, and courtesy in the civil service. It shall strengthen the merit and rewards system, integrate all human resources development programs for all levels and ranks, and institutionalize a management climate conducive to public accountability. It shall submit to the President and the Congress an annual report on its personnel programs.

Section 4.

All public officers and employees shall take an oath or affirmation to uphold and defend this Constitution.

Section 5.

The Congress shall provide for the standardization of compensation of government officials and employees, including those in government-owned or controlled corporations with original charters, taking into account the nature of the responsibilities pertaining to, and the qualifications required for, their positions.

Section 6.

No candidate who has lost in any election, shall within one year after such election, be appointed to any office in the Government or any Government-owned or controlled corporations or in any of their subsidiaries.

Section 7.

(1) No elective official shall be eligible for appointment or designation in any capacity to any public office or position during his tenure. (2) Unless otherwise allowed by law or by the primary functions of his position, no appointive official shall hold any other office or employment in the Government or any subdivision, agency or instrumentality thereof, including Government-owned or controlled corporations or their subsidiaries.

Section 8.

No elective or appointive public officer or employee shall receive additional, double, or indirect compensation, unless specifically authorized by law, nor accept without the consent of the Congress, any present, emolument, office, or title of any kind from any foreign government. Pensions or gratuities shall not be considered as additional, double, or indirect compensation.

C. THE COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS

Section 1.

(1) There shall be a Commission on Elections composed of a Chairman and six Commissioners who shall be natural-born citizens of the Philippines and, at the time of their appointment, at least thirty-five years of age, holders of a college degree, and must not have been candidates for any elective positions in the immediately preceding elections. However, a majority thereof, including the Chairman, shall be members of the Philippine Bar who have been engaged in the practice of law for at least ten years. (2) The Chairman and the Commissioners shall be appointed by the President with the consent of the Commission on Appointments for a term of seven years without reappointment. Of those first appointed, three Members shall hold office for seven years, two Members for five years, and the last Members for three years, without reappointment. Appointment to any vacancy shall be only for the unexpired term of the predecessor. In no case shall any Member be appointed or designated in a temporary or acting capacity.

Section 2.

The Commission on Elections shall exercise the following powers and functions: (1) Enforce and administer all laws and regulations relative to the conduct of an election, plebiscite, initiative, referendum, and recall. (2) Exercise exclusive original jurisdiction over all contests relating to the elections, returns, and qualifications of all elective regional, provincial, and city officials, and appellate jurisdiction over all contests involving elective municipal officials decided by trial courts of general jurisdiction, or involving elective barangay officials decided by trial courts of limited jurisdiction. Decisions, final orders, or rulings of the Commission on election contests involving elective municipal and barangay offices shall be final, executory, and not appealable. (3) Decide, except those involving the right to vote, all questions affecting elections, including determination of the number and location of polling places, appointment of election officials and inspectors, and registration of voters. (4) Deputize, with the concurrence of the President, law enforcement agencies and instrumentalities of the Government, including the Armed Forces of the Philippines, for the exclusive purpose of ensuring free, orderly, honest, peaceful, and credible elections. (5) Register, after sufficient publication, political parties, organizations, or coalitions which, in addition to other requirements, must present their platform or program of government; and accredit citizens’ arms of the Commission on Elections. Religious denominations and sects shall not be registered. Those which seek to achieve their goals through violence or unlawful means, or refuse to uphold and adhere to this Constitution, or which are supported by any foreign government shall likewise be refused registration. Financial contributions from foreign governments and their agencies to political parties, organizations, coalitions, or candidates related to elections, constitute interference in national affairs, and, when accepted, shall be an additional ground for the cancellation of their registration with the Commission, in addition to other penalties that may be prescribed by law. (6) File, upon a verified complaint, or on its own initiative, petitions in court for inclusion or exclusion of voters; investigate and, where appropriate, prosecute cases of violations of election laws, including acts or omissions constituting election frauds, offenses, and malpractices. (7) Recommend to the Congress effective measures to minimize election spending, including limitation of places where propaganda materials shall be posted, and to prevent and penalize all forms of election frauds, offenses, malpractices, and nuisance candidacies. (8) Recommend to the President the removal of any officer or employee it has deputized, or the imposition of any other disciplinary action, for violation or disregard of, or disobedience to, its directive, order, or decision. (9) Submit to the President and the Congress, a comprehensive report on the conduct of each election, plebiscite, initiative, referendum, or recall.

Section 3.

The Commission on Elections may sit en banc or in two divisions, and shall promulgate its rules of procedure in order to expedite disposition of election cases, including pre-proclamation controversies. All such election cases shall be heard and decided in division, provided that motions for reconsideration of decisions shall be decided by the Commission en banc.

Section 4.

The Commission may, during the election period, supervise or regulate the enjoyment or utilization of all franchises or permits for the operation of transportation and other public utilities, media of communication or information, all grants, special privileges, or concessions granted by the Government or any subdivision, agency, or instrumentality thereof, including any government-owned or controlled corporation or its subsidiary. Such supervision or regulation shall aim to ensure equal opportunity, time, and space, and the right to reply, including reasonable, equal rates therefor, for public information campaigns and forums among candidates in connection with the objective of holding free, orderly, honest, peaceful, and credible elections.

Section 5.

No pardon, amnesty, parole, or suspension of sentence for violation of election laws, rules, and regulations shall be granted by the President without the favorable recommendation of the Commission.

Section 6.

A free and open party system shall be allowed to evolve according to the free choice of the people, subject to the provisions of this Article.

Section 7.

No votes cast in favor of a political party, organization, or coalition shall be valid, except for those registered under the party-list system as provided in this Constitution.

Section 8.

Political parties, or organizations or coalitions registered under the party-list system, shall not be represented in the voters’ registration boards, boards of election inspectors, boards of canvassers, or other similar bodies. However, they shall be entitled to appoint poll watchers in accordance with law.

Section 9.

Unless otherwise fixed by the Commission in special cases, the election period shall commence ninety days before the day of election and shall end thirty days thereafter.

Section 10.

Bona fide candidates for any public office shall be free from any form of harassment and discrimination.

Section 11.

Funds certified by the Commission as necessary to defray the expenses for holding regular and special elections, plebiscites, initiatives, referenda, and recalls, shall be provided in the regular or special appropriations and, once approved, shall be released automatically upon certification by the Chairman of the Commission.

D. THE COMMISSION ON AUDIT

Section 1.

(1) There shall be a Commission on Audit composed of a Chairman and two Commissioners, who shall be natural-born citizens of the Philippines and, at the time of their appointment, at least thirty-five years of age, Certified Public Accountants with not less than ten years of auditing experience, or members of the Philippine Bar who have been engaged in the practice of law for at least ten years, and must not have been candidates for any elective position in the elections immediately preceding their appointment. At no time shall all Members of the Commission belong to the same profession. (2) The Chairman and the Commissioners shall be appointed by the President with the consent of the Commission on Appointments for a term of seven years without reappointment. Of those first appointed, the Chairman shall hold office for seven years, one Commissioner for five years, and the other Commissioner for three years, without reappointment. Appointment to any vacancy shall be only for the unexpired portion of the term of the predecessor. In no case shall any Member be appointed or designated in a temporary or acting capacity.

Section 2.

(1) The Commission on Audit shall have the power, authority, and duty to examine, audit, and settle all accounts pertaining to the revenue and receipts of, and expenditures or uses of funds and property, owned or held in trust by, or pertaining to, the Government, or any of its subdivisions, agencies, or instrumentalities, including government-owned or controlled corporations with original charters, and on a post-audit basis: (a) constitutional bodies, commissions and offices that have been granted fiscal autonomy under this Constitution; (b) autonomous state colleges and universities; (c) other government-owned or controlled corporations and their subsidiaries; and (d) such non-governmental entities receiving subsidy or equity, directly or indirectly, from or through the Government, which are required by law or the granting institution to submit to such audit as a condition of subsidy or equity. However, where the internal control system of the audited agencies is inadequate, the Commission may adopt such measures, including temporary or special pre-audit, as are necessary and appropriate to correct the deficiencies. It shall keep the general accounts of the Government and, for such period as may be provided by law, preserve the vouchers and other supporting papers pertaining thereto. (2) The Commission shall have exclusive authority, subject to the limitations in this Article, to define the scope of its audit and examination, establish the techniques and methods required therefor, and promulgate accounting and auditing rules and regulations, including those for the prevention and disallowance of irregular, unnecessary, excessive, extravagant, or unconscionable expenditures or uses of government funds and properties.

Section 3.

No law shall be passed exempting any entity of the Government or its subsidiaries in any guise whatever, or any investment of public funds, from the jurisdiction of the Commission on Audit.

Section 4.

The Commission shall submit to the President and the Congress, within the time fixed by law, an annual report covering the financial condition and operation of the Government, its subdivisions, agencies, and instrumentalities, including government-owned or controlled corporations, and non-governmental entities subject to its audit, and recommend measures necessary to improve their effectiveness and efficiency. It shall submit such other reports as may be required by law.

ARTICLE X – LOCAL GOVERNMENT

GENERAL PROVISIONS

Section 1.

The territorial and political subdivisions of the Republic of the Philippines are the provinces, cities, municipalities, and barangays. There shall be autonomous regions in Muslim Mindanao and the Cordilleras as hereinafter provided.

Section 2.

The territorial and political subdivisions shall enjoy local autonomy.

Section 3.

The Congress shall enact a local government code which shall provide for a more responsive and accountable local government structure instituted through a system of decentralization with effective mechanisms of recall, initiative, and referendum, allocate among the different local government units their powers, responsibilities, and resources, and provide for the qualifications, election, appointment and removal, term, salaries, powers and functions and duties of local officials, and all other matters relating to the organization and operation of the local units.

Section 4.

The President of the Philippines shall exercise general supervision over local governments. Provinces with respect to component cities and municipalities, and cities and municipalities with respect to component barangays, shall ensure that the acts of their component units are within the scope of their prescribed powers and functions.

Section 5.

Each local government unit shall have the power to create its own sources of revenues and to levy taxes, fees and charges subject to such guidelines and limitations as the Congress may provide, consistent with the basic policy of local autonomy. Such taxes, fees, and charges shall accrue exclusively to the local governments.

Section 6.

Local government units shall have a just share, as determined by law, in the national taxes which shall be automatically released to them.

Section 7.

Local governments shall be entitled to an equitable share in the proceeds of the utilization and development of the national wealth within their respective areas, in the manner provided by law, including sharing the same with the inhabitants by way of direct benefits.

Section 8.

The term of office of elective local officials, except barangay officials, which shall be determined by law, shall be three years and no such official shall serve for more than three consecutive terms. Voluntary renunciation of the office for any length of time shall not be considered as an interruption in the continuity of his service for the full term for which he was elected.

Section 9.

Legislative bodies of local governments shall have sectoral representation as may be prescribed by law.

Section 10.

No province, city, municipality, or barangay may be created, divided, merged, abolished, or its boundary substantially altered, except in accordance with the criteria established in the local government code and subject to approval by a majority of the votes cast in a plebiscite in the political units directly affected.

Section 11.

The Congress may, by law, create special metropolitan political subdivisions, subject to a plebiscite as set forth in Section 10 hereof. The component cities and municipalities shall retain their basic autonomy and shall be entitled to their own local executive and legislative assemblies. The jurisdiction of the metropolitan authority that will thereby be created shall be limited to basic services requiring coordination.

Section 12.

Cities that are highly urbanized, as determined by law, and component cities whose charters prohibit their voters from voting for provincial elective officials, shall be independent of the province. The voters of component cities within a province, whose charters contain no such prohibition, shall not be deprived of their right to vote for elective provincial officials.

Section 13.

Local government units may group themselves, consolidate or coordinate their efforts, services, and resources for purposes commonly beneficial to them in accordance with law.

Section 14.

The President shall provide for regional development councils or other similar bodies composed of local government officials, regional heads of departments and other government offices, and representatives from non-governmental organizations within the regions for purposes of administrative decentralization to strengthen the autonomy of the units therein and to accelerate the economic and social growth and development of the units in the region.

AUTONOMOUS REGIONS

Section 15.

There shall be created autonomous regions in Muslim Mindanao and in the Cordilleras consisting of provinces, cities, municipalities, and geographical areas sharing common and distinctive historical and cultural heritage, economic and social structures, and other relevant characteristics within the framework of this Constitution and the national sovereignty as well as territorial integrity of the Republic of the Philippines.

Section 16.

The President shall exercise general supervision over autonomous regions to ensure that laws are faithfully executed.

Section 17.

All powers, functions, and responsibilities not granted by this Constitution or by law to the autonomous regions shall be vested in the National Government.

Section 18.

The Congress shall enact an organic act for each autonomous region with the assistance and participation of the regional consultative commission composed of representatives appointed by the President from a list of nominees from multi-sectoral bodies. The organic act shall define the basic structure of government for the region consisting of the executive department and legislative assembly, both of which shall be elective and representative of the constituent political units. The organic acts shall likewise provide for special courts with personal, family, and property law jurisdiction consistent with the provisions of this Constitution and national laws. The creation of the autonomous region shall be effective when approved by majority of the votes cast by the constituent units in a plebiscite called for the purpose, provided that only provinces, cities, and geographic areas voting favorably in such plebiscite shall be included in the autonomous region.

Section 19.

The first Congress elected under this Constitution shall, within eighteen months from the time of organization of both Houses, pass the organic acts for the autonomous regions in Muslim Mindanao and the Cordilleras.

Section 20.

Within its territorial jurisdiction and subject to the provisions of this Constitution and national laws, the organic act of autonomous regions shall provide for legislative powers over: (1) Administrative organization; (2) Creation of sources of revenues; (3) Ancestral domain and natural resources; (4) Personal, family, and property relations; (5) Regional urban and rural planning development; (6) Economic, social, and tourism development; (7) Educational policies; (8) Preservation and development of the cultural heritage; and (9) Such other matters as may be authorized by law for the promotion of the general welfare of the people of the region.

Section 21.

The preservation of peace and order within the regions shall be the responsibility of the local police agencies which shall be organized, maintained, supervised, and utilized in accordance with applicable laws. The defense and security of the regions shall be the responsibility of the National Government.

ARTICLE XI – ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC OFFICERS

Section 1.

Public office is a public trust. Public officers and employees must, at all times, be accountable to the people, serve them with utmost responsibility, integrity, loyalty, and efficiency; act with patriotism and justice, and lead modest lives.

Section 2.

The President, the Vice-President, the Members of the Supreme Court, the Members of the Constitutional Commissions, and the Ombudsman may be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, culpable violation of the Constitution, treason, bribery, graft and corruption, other high crimes, or betrayal of public trust. All other public officers and employees may be removed from office as provided by law, but not by impeachment.

Section 3.

(1) The House of Representatives shall have the exclusive power to initiate all cases of impeachment. (2) A verified complaint for impeachment may be filed by any Member of the House of Representatives or by any citizen upon a resolution or endorsement by any Member thereof, which shall be included in the Order of Business within ten session days, and referred to the proper Committee within three session days thereafter. The Committee, after hearing, and by a majority vote of all its Members, shall submit its report to the House within sixty session days from such referral, together with the corresponding resolution. The resolution shall be calendared for consideration by the House within ten session days from receipt thereof. (3) A vote of at least one-third of all the Members of the House shall be necessary either to affirm a favorable resolution with the Articles of Impeachment of the Committee, or override its contrary resolution. The vote of each Member shall be recorded. (4) In case the verified complaint or resolution of impeachment is filed by at least one-third of all the Members of the House, the same shall constitute the Articles of Impeachment, and trial by the Senate shall forthwith proceed. (5) No impeachment proceedings shall be initiated against the same official more than once within a period of one year. (6) The Senate shall have the sole power to try and decide all cases of impeachment. When sitting for that purpose, the Senators shall be on oath or affirmation. When the President of the Philippines is on trial, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court shall preside, but shall not vote. No person shall be convicted without the concurrence of two-thirds of all the Members of the Senate. (7) Judgment in cases of impeachment shall not extend further than removal from office and disqualification to hold any office under the Republic of the Philippines, but the party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to prosecution, trial, and punishment, according to law. (8) The Congress shall promulgate its rules on impeachment to effectively carry out the purpose of this section.

Section 4.

The present anti-graft court known as the Sandiganbayan shall continue to function and exercise its jurisdiction as now or hereafter may be provided by law.

Section 5.

There is hereby created the independent Office of the Ombudsman, composed of the Ombudsman to be known as Tanodbayan, one overall Deputy and at least one Deputy each for Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao. A separate Deputy for the military establishment may likewise be appointed.

Section 6.

The officials and employees of the Office of the Ombudsman, other than the Deputies, shall be appointed by the Ombudsman, according to the Civil Service Law.

Section 7.

The existing Tanodbayan shall hereafter be known as the Office of the Special Prosecutor. It shall continue to function and exercise its powers as now or hereafter may be provided by law, except those conferred on the Office of the Ombudsman created under this Constitution.

Section 8.

The Ombudsman and his Deputies shall be natural-born citizens of the Philippines, and at the time of their appointment, at least forty years old, of recognized probity and independence, and members of the Philippine Bar, and must not have been candidates for any elective office in the immediately preceding election. The Ombudsman must have, for ten years or more, been a judge or engaged in the practice of law in the Philippines. During their tenure, they shall be subject to the same disqualifications and prohibitions as provided for in Section 2 of Article IX-A of this Constitution.

Section 9.

The Ombudsman and his Deputies shall be appointed by the President from a list of at least six nominees prepared by the Judicial and Bar Council, and from a list of three nominees for every vacancy thereafter. Such appointments shall require no confirmation. All vacancies shall be filled within three months after they occur.

Section 10.

The Ombudsman and his Deputies shall have the rank of Chairman and Members, respectively, of the Constitutional Commissions, and they shall receive the same salary which shall not be decreased during their term of office.

Section 11.

The Ombudsman and his Deputies shall serve for a term of seven years without reappointment. They shall not be qualified to run for any office in the election immediately succeeding their cessation from office.

Section 12.

The Ombudsman and his Deputies, as protectors of the people, shall act promptly on complaints filed in any form or manner against public officials or employees of the Government, or any subdivision, agency or instrumentality thereof, including government-owned or controlled corporations, and shall, in appropriate cases, notify the complainants of the action taken and the result thereof.

Section 13.

The Office of the Ombudsman shall have the following powers, functions, and duties: (1) Investigate on its own, or on complaint by any person, any act or omission of any public official, employee, office or agency, when such act or omission appears to be illegal, unjust, improper, or inefficient. (2) Direct, upon complaint or at its own instance, any public official or employee of the Government, or any subdivision, agency or instrumentality thereof, as well as of any government-owned or controlled corporation with original charter, to perform and expedite any act or duty required by law, or to stop, prevent, and correct any abuse or impropriety in the performance of duties. (3) Direct the officer concerned to take appropriate action against a public official or employee at fault, and recommend his removal, suspension, demotion, fine, censure, or prosecution, and ensure compliance therewith. (4) Direct the officer concerned, in any appropriate case, and subject to such limitations as may be provided by law, to furnish it with copies of documents relating to contracts or transactions entered into by his office involving the disbursement or use of public funds or properties, and report any irregularity to the Commission on Audit for appropriate action. (5) Request any government agency for assistance and information necessary in the discharge of its responsibilities, and to examine, if necessary, pertinent records and documents. (6) Publicize matters covered by its investigation when circumstances so warrant and with due prudence. (7) Determine the causes of inefficiency, red tape, mismanagement, fraud, and corruption in the Government and make recommendations for their elimination and the observance of high standards of ethics and efficiency. (8) Promulgate its rules of procedure and exercise such other powers or perform such functions or duties as may be provided by law.

Section 14.

The Office of the Ombudsman shall enjoy fiscal autonomy. Its approved annual appropriations shall be automatically and regularly released.

Section 15.

The right of the State to recover properties unlawfully acquired by public officials or employees, from them or from their nominees or transferees, shall not be barred by prescription, laches, or estoppel.

Section 16.

No loan, guaranty, or other form of financial accommodation for any business purpose may be granted, directly or indirectly, by any government-owned or controlled bank or financial institution to the President, the Vice-President, the Members of the Cabinet, the Congress, the Supreme Court, and the Constitutional Commissions, the Ombudsman, or to any firm or entity in which they have controlling interest, during their tenure.

Section 17.

A public officer or employee shall, upon assumption of office and as often thereafter as may be required by law, submit a declaration under oath of his assets, liabilities, and net worth. In the case of the President, the Vice-President, the Members of the Cabinet, the Congress, the Supreme Court, the Constitutional Commissions and other constitutional offices, and officers of the armed forces with general or flag rank, the declaration shall be disclosed to the public in the manner provided by law.

Section 18.

Public officers and employees owe the State and this Constitution allegiance at all times and any public officer or employee who seeks to change his citizenship or acquire the status of an immigrant of another country during his tenure shall be dealt with by law.

ARTICLE XII – NATIONAL ECONOMY AND PATRIMONY

Section 1.

The goals of the national economy are a more equitable distribution of opportunities, income, and wealth; a sustained increase in the amount of goods and services produced by the nation for the benefit of the people; and an expanding productivity as the key to raising the quality of life for all, especially the underprivileged. The State shall promote industrialization and full employment based on sound agricultural development and agrarian reform, through industries that make full use of efficient use of human and natural resources, and which are competitive in both domestic and foreign markets. However, the State shall protect Filipino enterprises against unfair foreign competition and trade practices. In the pursuit of these goals, all sectors of the economy and all regions of the country shall be given optimum opportunity to develop. Private enterprises, including corporations, cooperatives, and similar collective organizations, shall be encouraged to broaden the base of their ownership.

Section 2.

All lands of the public domain, waters, minerals, coal, petroleum, and other mineral oils, all forces of potential energy, fisheries, forests or timber, wildlife, flora and fauna, and other natural resources are owned by the State. With the exception of agricultural lands, all other natural resources shall not be alienated. The exploration, development, and utilization of natural resources shall be under the full control and supervision of the State. The State may directly undertake such activities, or it may enter into co-production, joint venture, or production-sharing agreements with Filipino citizens, or corporations or associations at least 60 per centum of whose capital is owned by such citizens. Such agreements may be for a period not exceeding twenty-five years, renewable for not more than twenty-five years, and under such terms and conditions as may provided by law. In cases of water rights for irrigation, water supply, fisheries, or industrial uses other than the development of waterpower, beneficial use may be the measure and limit of the grant. The State shall protect the nations marine wealth in its archipelagic waters, territorial sea, and exclusive economic zone, and reserve its use and enjoyment exclusively to Filipino citizens. The Congress may, by law, allow small-scale utilization of natural resources by Filipino citizens, as well as cooperative fish farming, with priority to subsistence fishermen and fish workers in rivers, lakes, bays, and lagoons. The President may enter into agreements with foreign-owned corporations involving either technical or financial assistance for large-scale exploration, development, and utilization of minerals, petroleum, and other mineral oils according to the general terms and conditions provided by law, based on real contributions to the economic growth and general welfare of the country. In such agreements, the State shall promote the development and use of local scientific and technical resources. The President shall notify the Congress of every contract entered into in accordance with this provision, within thirty days from its execution.

Section 3.

Lands of the public domain are classified into agricultural, forest or timber, mineral lands and national parks. Agricultural lands of the public domain may be further classified by law according to the uses to which they may be devoted. Alienable lands of the public domain shall be limited to agricultural lands. Private corporations or associations may not hold such alienable lands of the public domain except by lease, for a period not exceeding twenty-five years, renewable for not more than twenty-five years, and not to exceed one thousand hectares in area. Citizens of the Philippines may lease not more than five hundred hectares, or acquire not more than twelve hectares thereof, by purchase, homestead, or grant. Taking into account the requirements of conservation, ecology, and development, and subject to the requirements of agrarian reform, the Congress shall determine, by law, the size of lands of the public domain which may be acquired, developed, held, or leased and the conditions therefor.

Section 4.

The Congress shall, as soon as possible, determine, by law, the specific limits of forest lands and national parks, marking clearly their boundaries on the ground. Thereafter, such forest lands and national parks shall be conserved and may not be increased nor diminished, except by law. The Congress shall provide for such period as it may determine, measures to prohibit logging in endangered forests and watershed areas.

Section 5.

The State, subject to the provisions of this Constitution and national development policies and programs, shall protect the rights of indigenous cultural communities to their ancestral lands to ensure their economic, social, and cultural well-being. The Congress may provide for the applicability of customary laws governing property rights or relations in determining the ownership and extent of ancestral domain.

Section 6.

The use of property bears a social function, and all economic agents shall contribute to the common good. Individuals and private groups, including corporations, cooperatives, and similar collective organizations, shall have the right to own, establish, and operate economic enterprises, subject to the duty of the State to promote distributive justice and to intervene when the common good so demands.

Section 7.

Save in cases of hereditary succession, no private lands shall be transferred or conveyed except to individuals, corporations, or associations qualified to acquire or hold lands of the public domain.

Section 8.

Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 7 of this Article, a natural-born citizen of the Philippines who has lost his Philippine citizenship may be a transferee of private lands, subject to limitations provided by law.

Section 9.

The Congress may establish an independent economic and planning agency headed by the President, which shall, after consultations with the appropriate public agencies, various private sectors, and local government units, recommend to Congress, and implement continuing integrated and coordinated programs and policies for national development. Until the Congress provides otherwise, the National Economic and Development Authority shall function as the independent planning agency of the government.

Section 10.

The Congress shall, upon recommendation of the economic and planning agency, when the national interest dictates, reserve to citizens of the Philippines or to corporations or associations at least sixty per centum of whose capital is owned by such citizens, or such higher percentage as Congress may prescribe, certain areas of investments. The Congress shall enact measures that will encourage the formation and operation of enterprises whose capital is wholly owned by Filipinos. In the grant of rights, privileges, and concessions covering the national economy and patrimony, the State shall give preference to qualified Filipinos. The State shall regulate and exercise authority over foreign investments within its national jurisdiction and in accordance with its national goals and priorities.

Section 11.

No franchise, certificate, or any other form of authorization for the operation of a public utility shall be granted except to citizens of the Philippines or to corporations or associations organized under the laws of the Philippines, at least sixty per centum of whose capital is owned by such citizens; nor shall such franchise, certificate, or authorization be exclusive in character or for a longer period than fifty years. Neither shall any such franchise or right be granted except under the condition that it shall be subject to amendment, alteration, or repeal by the Congress when the common good so requires. The State shall encourage equity participation in public utilities by the general public. The participation of foreign investors in the governing body of any public utility enterprise shall be limited to their proportionate share in its capital, and all the executive and managing officers of such corporation or association must be citizens of the Philippines.

Section 12.

The State shall promote the preferential use of Filipino labor, domestic materials and locally produced goods, and adopt measures that help make them competitive.

Section 13.

The State shall pursue a trade policy that serves the general welfare and utilizes all forms and arrangements of exchange on the basis of equality and reciprocity.

Section 14.

The sustained development of a reservoir of national talents consisting of Filipino scientists, entrepreneurs, professionals, managers, high-level technical manpower and skilled workers and craftsmen in all fields shall be promoted by the State. The State shall encourage appropriate technology and regulate its transfer for the national benefit. The practice of all professions in the Philippines shall be limited to Filipino citizens, save in cases prescribed by law.

Section 15.

The Congress shall create an agency to promote the viability and growth of cooperatives as instruments for social justice and economic development.

Section 16.

The Congress shall not, except by general law, provide for the formation, organization, or regulation of private corporations. Government-owned or controlled corporations may be created or established by special charters in the interest of the common good and subject to the test of economic viability.

Section 17.

In times of national emergency, when the public interest so requires, the State may, during the emergency and under reasonable terms prescribed by it, temporarily take over or direct the operation of any privately-owned public utility or business affected with public interest.

Section 18.

The State may, in the interest of national welfare or defense, establish and operate vital industries and, upon payment of just compensation, transfer to public ownership utilities and other private enterprises to be operated by the Government.

Section 19.

The State shall regulate or prohibit monopolies when the public interest so requires. No combinations in restraint of trade or unfair competition shall be allowed.

Section 20.

The Congress shall establish an independent central monetary authority, the members of whose governing board must be natural-born Filipino citizens, of known probity, integrity, and patriotism, the majority of whom shall come from the private sector. They shall also be subject to such other qualifications and disabilities as may be prescribed by law. The authority shall provide policy direction in the areas of money, banking, and credit. It shall have supervision over the operations of banks and exercise such regulatory powers as may be provided by law over the operations of finance companies and other institutions performing similar functions. Until the Congress otherwise provides, the Central Bank of the Philippines operating under existing laws, shall function as the central monetary authority.

Section 21.

Foreign loans may only be incurred in accordance with law and the regulation of the monetary authority. Information on foreign loans obtained or guaranteed by the Government shall be made available to the public.

Section 22.

Acts which circumvent or negate any of the provisions of this Article shall be considered inimical to the national interest and subject to criminal and civil sanctions, as may be provided by law.

ARTICLE XIII – SOCIAL JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS

Section 1.

The Congress shall give highest priority to the enactment of measures that protect and enhance the right of all the people to human dignity, reduce social, economic, and political inequalities, and remove cultural inequities by equitably diffusing wealth and political power for the common good. To this end, the State shall regulate the acquisition, ownership, use, and disposition of property and its increments.

Section 2.

The promotion of social justice shall include the commitment to create economic opportunities based on freedom of initiative and self-reliance.

LABOR

Section 3.

The State shall afford full protection to labor, local and overseas, organized and unorganized, and promote full employment and equality of employment opportunities for all. It shall guarantee the rights of all workers to self-organization, collective bargaining and negotiations, and peaceful concerted activities, including the right to strike in accordance with law. They shall be entitled to security of tenure, humane conditions of work, and a living wage. They shall also participate in policy and decision-making processes affecting their rights and benefits as may be provided by law. The State shall promote the principle of shared responsibility between workers and employers and the preferential use of voluntary modes in settling disputes, including conciliation, and shall enforce their mutual compliance therewith to foster industrial peace. The State shall regulate the relations between workers and employers, recognizing the right of labor to its just share in the fruits of production and the right of enterprises to reasonable returns to investments, and to expansion and growth.

AGRARIAN AND NATURAL RESOURCES REFORM

Section 4.

The State shall, by law, undertake an agrarian reform program founded on the right of farmers and regular farmworkers who are landless, to own directly or collectively the lands they till or, in the case of other farmworkers, to receive a just share of the fruits thereof. To this end, the State shall encourage and undertake the just distribution of all agricultural lands, subject to such priorities and reasonable retention limits as the Congress may prescribe, taking into account ecological, developmental, or equity considerations, and subject to the payment of just compensation. In determining retention limits, the State shall respect the right of small landowners. The State shall further provide incentives for voluntary land-sharing.

Section 5.

The State shall recognize the right of farmers, farmworkers, and landowners, as well as cooperatives, and other independent farmers’ organizations to participate in the planning, organization, and management of the program, and shall provide support to agriculture through appropriate technology and research, and adequate financial, production, marketing, and other support services.

Section 6.

The State shall apply the principles of agrarian reform or stewardship, whenever applicable in accordance with law, in the disposition or utilization of other natural resources, including lands of the public domain under lease or concession suitable to agriculture, subject to prior rights, homestead rights of small settlers, and the rights of indigenous communities to their ancestral lands. The State may resettle landless farmers and farmworkers in its own agricultural estates which shall be distributed to them in the manner provided by law.

Section 7.

The State shall protect the rights of subsistence fishermen, especially of local communities, to the preferential use of the communal marine and fishing resources, both inland and offshore. It shall provide support to such fishermen through appropriate technology and research, adequate financial, production, and marketing assistance, and other services. The State shall also protect, develop, and conserve such resources. The protection shall extend to offshore fishing grounds of subsistence fishermen against foreign intrusion. Fishworkers shall receive a just share from their labor in the utilization of marine and fishing resources.

Section 8.

The State shall provide incentives to landowners to invest the proceeds of the agrarian reform program to promote industrialization, employment creation, and privatization of public sector enterprises. Financial instruments used as payment for their lands shall be honored as equity in enterprises of their choice.

URBAN LAND REFORM AND HOUSING

Section 9.

The State shall, by law, and for the common good, undertake, in cooperation with the private sector, a continuing program of urban land reform and housing which will make available at affordable cost, decent housing and basic services to under-privileged and homeless citizens in urban centers and resettlement areas. It shall also promote adequate employment opportunities to such citizens. In the implementation of such program the State shall respect the rights of small property owners.

Section 10.

Urban or rural poor dwellers shall not be evicted nor their dwelling demolished, except in accordance with law and in a just and humane manner. No resettlement of urban or rural dwellers shall be undertaken without adequate consultation with them and the communities where they are to be relocated.

HEALTH

Section 11.

The State shall adopt an integrated and comprehensive approach to health development which shall endeavor to make essential goods, health and other social services available to all the people at affordable cost. There shall be priority for the needs of the under-privileged, sick, elderly, disabled, women, and children. The State shall endeavor to provide free medical care to paupers.

Section 12.

The State shall establish and maintain an effective food and drug regulatory system and undertake appropriate health, manpower development, and research, responsive to the country’s health needs and problems.

Section 13.

The State shall establish a special agency for disabled person for their rehabilitation, self-development, and self-reliance, and their integration into the mainstream of society.

WOMEN

Section 14.

The State shall protect working women by providing safe and healthful working conditions, taking into account their maternal functions, and such facilities and opportunities that will enhance their welfare and enable them to realize their full potential in the service of the nation.

ROLE AND RIGHTS OF PEOPLE’S ORGANIZATIONS

Section 15.

The State shall respect the role of independent people’s organizations to enable the people to pursue and protect, within the democratic framework, their legitimate and collective interests and aspirations through peaceful and lawful means. People’s organizations are bona fide associations of citizens with demonstrated capacity to promote the public interest and with identifiable leadership, membership, and structure.

Section 16.

The right of the people and their organizations to effective and reasonable participation at all levels of social, political, and economic decision-making shall not be abridged. The State shall, by law, facilitate the establishment of adequate consultation mechanisms.

HUMAN RIGHTS

Section 17.

(1) There is hereby created an independent office called the Commission on Human Rights. (2) The Commission shall be composed of a Chairman and four Members who must be natural-born citizens of the Philippines and a majority of whom shall be members of the Bar. The term of office and other qualifications and disabilities of the Members of the Commission shall be provided by law. (3) Until this Commission is constituted, the existing Presidential Committee on Human Rights shall continue to exercise its present functions and powers. (4) The approved annual appropriations of the Commission shall be automatically and regularly released.

Section 18.

The Commission on Human Rights shall have the following powers and functions: (1) Investigate, on its own or on complaint by any party, all forms of human rights violations involving civil and political rights; (2) Adopt its operational guidelines and rules of procedure, and cite for contempt for violations thereof in accordance with the Rules of Court; (3) Provide appropriate legal measures for the protection of human rights of all persons within the Philippines, as well as Filipinos residing abroad, and provide for preventive measures and legal aid services to the under-privileged whose human rights have been violated or need protection; (4) Exercise visitorial powers over jails, prisons, or detention facilities; (5) Establish a continuing program of research, education, and information to enhance respect for the primacy of human rights; (6) Recommend to Congress effective measures to promote human rights and to provide for compensation to victims of violations of human rights, or their families; (7) Monitor the Philippine Government’s compliance with international treaty obligations on human rights; (8) Grant immunity from prosecution to any person whose testimony or whose possession of documents or other evidence is necessary or convenient to determine the truth in any investigation conducted by it or under its authority; (9) Request the assistance of any department, bureau, office, or agency in the performance of its functions; (10) Appoint its officers and employees in accordance with law; and (11) Perform such other duties and functions as may be provided by law.

Section 19.

The Congress may provide for other cases of violations of human rights that should fall within the authority of the Commission, taking into account its recommendations.

ARTICLE XIV – EDUCATION, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, ARTS, CULTURE AND SPORTS

EDUCATION

Section 1.

The State shall protect and promote the right of all citizens to quality education at all levels, and shall take appropriate steps to make such education accessible to all.

Section 2.

The State shall: (1) Establish, maintain, and support a complete, adequate, and integrated system of education relevant to the needs of the people and society; (2) Establish and maintain, a system of free public education in the elementary and high school levels. Without limiting the natural rights of parents to rear their children, elementary education is compulsory for all children of school age; (3) Establish and maintain a system of scholarship grants, student loan programs, subsidies, and other incentives which shall be available to deserving students in both public and private schools, especially to the under-privileged; (4) Encourage non-formal, informal, and indigenous learning systems, as well as self-learning, independent, and out-of-school study programs particularly those that respond to community needs; and (5) Provide adult citizens, the disabled, and out-of-school youth with training in civics, vocational efficiency, and other skills.

Section 3.

(1) All educational institutions shall include the study of the Constitution as part of the curricula. (2) They shall inculcate patriotism and nationalism, foster love of humanity, respect for human rights, appreciation of the role of national heroes in the historical development of the country, teach the rights and duties of citizenship, strengthen ethical and spiritual values, develop moral character and personal discipline, encourage critical and creative thinking, broaden scientific and technological knowledge, and promote vocational efficiency. (3) At the option expressed in writing by the parents or guardians, religion shall be allowed to be taught to their children or wards in public elementary and high schools within the regular class hours by instructors designated or approved by the religious authorities of the religion to which the children or wards belong, without additional cost to the Government.

Section 4.

(1) The State recognizes the complementary roles of public and private institutions in the educational system and shall exercise reasonable supervision and regulation of all educational institutions. (2) Educational institutions, other than those established by religious groups and mission boards, shall be owned solely by citizens of the Philippines or corporations or associations at least sixty per centum of the capital of which is owned by such citizens. The Congress may, however, require increased Filipino equity participation in all educational institutions. The control and administration of educational institutions shall be vested in citizens of the Philippines. (3) No educational institution shall be established exclusively for aliens and no group of aliens shall comprise more than one-third of the enrollment in any school. The provisions of this sub section shall not apply to schools established for foreign diplomatic personnel and their dependents and, unless otherwise provided by law, for other foreign temporary residents. (4) All revenues and assets of non-stock, non-profit educational institutions used actually, directly, and exclusively for educational purposes shall be exempt from taxes and duties. Upon the dissolution or cessation of the corporate existence of such institutions, their assets shall be disposed of in the manner provided by law. (5) Proprietary educational institutions, including those cooperatively owned, may likewise be entitled to such exemptions, subject to the limitations provided by law, including restrictions on dividends and provisions for reinvestment. (6) Subject to conditions prescribed by law, all grants, endowments, donations, or contributions used actually, directly, and exclusively for educational purposes shall be exempt from tax.

Section 5.

(1) the State shall take into account regional and sectoral needs and conditions and shall encourage local planning in the development of educational policies and programs. (2) Academic freedom shall be enjoyed in all institutions of higher learning. (3) Every citizen has a right to select a profession or course of study, subject to fair, reasonable, and equitable admission and academic requirements. (4) The State shall enhance the right of teachers to professional advancement. Non-teaching academic and non-academic personnel shall enjoy the protection of the State. (5) The State shall assign the highest budgetary priority to education and ensure that teaching will attract and retain its rightful share of the best available talents through adequate remuneration and other means of job satisfaction and fulfillment.

LANGUAGE

Section 6.

The national language of the Philippines is Filipino. As it evolves, it shall be further developed and enriched on the basis of existing Philippine and other languages. Subject to provisions of law and as the Congress may deem appropriate, the Government shall take steps to initiate and sustain the use of Filipino as a medium of official communication and as language of instruction in the educational system.

Section 7.

For purposes of communication and instruction, the official languages of the Philippines are Filipino and, until otherwise provided by law, English. The regional languages are the auxiliary official languages in the regions and shall serve as auxiliary media of instruction therein. Spanish and Arabic shall be promoted on a voluntary and optional basis.

Section 8.

This Constitution shall be promulgated in Filipino and English and shall be translated into major regional languages, Arabic, and Spanish.

Section 9.

The Congress shall establish a national language commission composed of representatives of various regions and disciplines which shall undertake, coordinate, and promote researches for the development, propagation, and preservation of Filipino and other languages.

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Section 10.

Science and technology are essential for national development and progress. The State shall give priority to research and development, invention, innovation, and their utilization; and to science and technology education, training, and services. It shall support indigenous, appropriate, and self-reliant scientific and technological capabilities, and their application to the country’s productive systems and national life.

Section 11.

The Congress may provide for incentives, including tax deductions, to encourage private participation in programs of basic and applied scientific research. Scholarships, grants-in-aid, or other forms of incentives shall be provided to deserving science students, researchers, scientists, inventors, technologists, and specially gifted citizens.

Section 12.

The State shall regulate the transfer and promote the adaptation of technology from all sources for the national benefit. It shall encourage the widest participation of private groups, local governments, and community-based organizations in the generation and utilization of science and technology.

Section 13.

The State shall protect and secure the exclusive rights of scientists, inventors, artists, and other gifted citizens to their intellectual property and creations, particularly when beneficial to the people, for such period as may be provided by law.

ARTS AND CULTURE

Section 14.

The State shall foster the preservation, enrichment, and dynamic evolution of a Filipino national culture based on the principle of unity in diversity in a climate of free artistic and intellectual expression.

Section 15.

Arts and letters shall enjoy the patronage of the State. The State shall conserve, promote, and popularize the nation’s historical and cultural heritage and resources, as well as artistic creations.

Section 16.

All the country’s artistic and historic wealth constitutes the cultural treasure of the nation and shall be under the protection of the State which may regulate its disposition.

Section 17.

The State shall recognize, respect, and protect the rights of indigenous cultural communities to preserve and develop their cultures, traditions, and institutions. It shall consider these rights in the formulation of national plans and policies.

Section 18.

(1) The State shall ensure equal access to cultural opportunities through the educational system, public or private cultural entities, scholarships, grants and other incentives, and community cultural centers, and other public venues. (2) The State shall encourage and support researches and studies on the arts and culture.

SPORTS

Section 19.

(1) The State shall promote physical education and encourage sports programs, league competitions, and amateur sports, including training for international competitions, to foster self-discipline, teamwork, and excellence for the development of a healthy and alert citizenry. (2) All educational institutions shall undertake regular sports activities throughout the country in cooperation with athletic clubs and other sectors.

ARTICLE XV – THE FAMILY

Section 1.

The State recognizes the Filipino family as the foundation of the nation. Accordingly, it shall strengthen its solidarity and actively promote its total development.

Section 2.

Marriage, as an inviolable social institution, is the foundation of the family and shall be protected by the State.

Section 3.

The State shall defend: (1) The right of spouses to found a family in accordance with their religious convictions and the demands of responsible parenthood; (2) The right of children to assistance, including proper care and nutrition, and special protection from all forms of neglect, abuse, cruelty, exploitation and other conditions prejudicial to their development; (3) The right of the family to a family living wage and income; and (4) The right of families or family associations to participate in the planning and implementation of policies and programs that affect them.

Section 4.

The family has the duty to care for its elderly members but the State may also do so through just programs of social security.

ARTICLE XVI – GENERAL PROVISIONS

Section 1.

The flag of the Philippines shall be red, white, and blue, with a sun and three stars, as consecrated and honored by the people and recognized by law.

Section 2.

The Congress may, by law, adopt a new name for the country, a national anthem, or a national seal, which shall all be truly reflective and symbolic of the ideals, history, and traditions of the people. Such law shall take effect only upon its ratification by the people in a national referendum.

Section 3.

The State may not be sued without its consent.

Section 4.

The Armed Forces of the Philippines shall be composed of a citizen armed force which shall undergo military training and serve as may be provided by law. It shall keep a regular force necessary for the security of the State.

Section 5.

(1) All members of the armed forces shall take an oath or affirmation to uphold and defend this Constitution. (2) The State shall strengthen the patriotic spirit and nationalist consciousness of the military, and respect for people’s rights in the performance of their duty. (3) Professionalism in the armed forces and adequate remuneration and benefits of its members shall be a prime concern of the State. The armed forces shall be insulated from partisan politics. No member of the military shall engage, directly or indirectly, in any partisan political activity, except to vote. (4) No member of the armed forces in the active service shall, at any time, be appointed or designated in any capacity to a civilian position in the Government, including government-owned or controlled corporations or any of their subsidiaries. (5) Laws on retirement of military officers shall not allow extension of their service. (6) The officers and men of the regular force of the armed forces shall be recruited proportionately from all provinces and cities as far as practicable. (7) The tour of duty of the Chief of Staff of the armed forces shall not exceed three years. However, in times of war or other national emergency declared by the Congress, the President may extend such tour of duty.

Section 6.

The State shall establish and maintain one police force, which shall be national in scope and civilian in character, to be administered and controlled by a national police commission. The authority of local executives over the police units in their jurisdiction shall be provided by law.

Section 7.

The State shall provide immediate and adequate care, benefits, and other forms of assistance to war veterans and veterans of military campaigns, their surviving spouses and orphans. Funds shall be provided therefor and due consideration shall be given them in the disposal of agricultural lands of the public domain and, in appropriate cases, in the utilization of natural resources.

Section 8.

The State shall, from time to time, review to increase the pensions and other benefits due to retirees of both the government and the private sectors.

Section 9.

The State shall protect consumers from trade malpractices and from substandard or hazardous products.

Section 10.

The State shall provide the policy environment for the full development of Filipino capability and the emergence of communication structures suitable to the needs and aspirations of the nation and the balanced flow of information into, out of, and across the country, in accordance with a policy that respects the freedom of speech and of the press.

Section 11.

(1) The ownership and management of mass media shall be limited to citizens of the Philippines, or to corporations, cooperatives or associations, wholly-owned and managed by such citizens. (2) The Congress shall regulate or prohibit monopolies in commercial mass media when the public interest so requires. No combinations in restraint of trade or unfair competition therein shall be allowed. (3) The advertising industry is impressed with public interest, and shall be regulated by law for the protection of consumers and the promotion of the general welfare. (4) Only Filipino citizens or corporations or associations at least seventy per centum of the capital of which is owned by such citizens shall be allowed to engage in the advertising industry. (5) The participation of foreign investors in the governing body of entities in such industry shall be limited to their proportionate share in the capital thereof, and all the executive and managing officers of such entities must be citizens of the Philippines.

Section 12.

The Congress may create a consultative body to advise the President on policies affecting indigenous cultural communities, the majority of the members of which shall come from such communities.

ARTICLE XVII – AMENDMENTS OR REVISIONS

Section 1.

Any amendment to, or revision of, this Constitution may be proposed by: (1) The Congress, upon a vote of three-fourths of all its Members; or (2) A constitutional convention.

Section 2.

Amendments to this Constitution may likewise be directly proposed by the people through initiative upon a petition of at least twelve per centum of the total number of registered voters, of which every legislative district must be represented by at least three per centum of the registered voters therein. No amendment under this section shall be authorized within five years following the ratification of this Constitution nor oftener than once every five years thereafter. The Congress shall provide for the implementation of the exercise of this right.

Section 3.

The Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of all its Members, call a constitutional convention, or by a majority vote of all its Members, submit to the electorate the question of calling such a convention.

Section 4.

Any amendment to, or revision of, this Constitution under Section 1 hereof shall be valid when ratified by a majority of the votes cast in a plebiscite which shall be held not earlier than sixty days nor later than ninety days after the approval of such amendment or revision. Any amendment under Section 2 hereof shall be valid when ratified by a majority of the votes cast in a plebiscite which shall be held not earlier than sixty days nor later than ninety days after the certification by the Commission on Elections of the sufficiency of the petition.

ARTICLE XVIII – TRANSITORY PROVISIONS

Section 1.

The first elections of Members of the Congress under this Constitution shall be held on the second Monday of May, 1987. The first local elections shall be held on a date to be determined by the President, which may be simultaneous with the election of the Members of the Congress. It shall include the election of all Members of the city or municipal councils in the Metropolitan Manila area.

Section 2.

The Senators, Members of the House of Representatives, and the local officials first elected under this Constitution shall serve until noon of June 30, 1992. Of the Senators elected in the elections in 1992, the first twelve obtaining the highest number of votes shall serve for six years and the remaining twelve for three years.

Section 3.

All existing laws, decrees, executive orders, proclamations, letters of instructions, and other executive issuances not inconsistent with this Constitution shall remain operative until amended, repealed, or revoked.

Section 4.

All existing treaties or international agreements which have not been ratified shall not be renewed or extended without the concurrence of at least two-thirds of all the Members of the Senate.

Section 5.

The six-year term of the incumbent President and Vice-President elected in the February 7, 1986 election is, for purposes of synchronization of elections, hereby extended to noon of June 30, 1992. The first regular elections for the President and Vice-President under this Constitution shall be held on the second Monday of May, 1992.

Section 6.

The incumbent President shall continue to exercise legislative powers until the first Congress is convened.

Section 7.

Until a law is passed, the President may fill by appointment from a list of nominees by the respective sectors, the seats reserved for sectoral representation in paragraph (2), Section 5 of Article VI of this Constitution.

Section 8.

Until otherwise provided by the Congress, the President may constitute the Metropolitan Manila Authority to be composed of the heads of all local government units comprising the Metropolitan Manila area.

Section 9.

A sub-province shall continue to exist and operate until it is converted into a regular province or until its component municipalities are reverted to the mother province.

Section 10.

All courts existing at the time of the ratification of this Constitution shall continue to exercise their jurisdiction, until otherwise provided by law. The provisions of the existing Rules of Court, judiciary acts, and procedural laws not inconsistent with this Constitution shall remain operative unless amended or repealed by the Supreme Court or the Congress.

Section 11.

The incumbent Members of the Judiciary shall continue in office until they reach the age of seventy years or become incapacitated to discharge the duties of their office or are removed for cause.

Section 12.

The Supreme Court shall, within one year after the ratification of this Constitution, adopt a systematic plan to expedite the decision or resolution of cases or matters pending in the Supreme Court or the lower courts prior to the effectivity of this Constitution. A similar plan shall be adopted for all special courts and quasi-judicial bodies.

Section 13.

The legal effect of the lapse, before the ratification of this Constitution, of the applicable period for the decision or resolution of the cases or matters submitted for adjudication by the courts, shall be determined by the Supreme Court as soon as practicable.

Section 14.

The provisions of paragraphs (3) and (4), Section 15 of Article VIII of this Constitution shall apply to cases or matters filed before the ratification of this Constitution, when the applicable period lapses after such ratification.

Section 15.

The incumbent Members of the Civil Service Commission, the Commission on Elections, and the Commission on Audit shall continue in office for one year after the ratification of this Constitution, unless they are sooner removed for cause or become incapacitated to discharge the duties of their office or appointed to a new term thereunder. In no case shall any Member serve longer than seven years including service before the ratification of this Constitution.

Section 16.

Career civil service employees separated from the service not for cause but as a result of the reorganization pursuant to Proclamation No. 3 dated March 25, 1986 and the reorganization following the ratification of this Constitution shall be entitled to appropriate separation pay and to retirement and other benefits accruing to them under the laws of general application in force at the time of their separation. In lieu thereof, at the option of the employees, they may be considered for employment in the Government or in any of its subdivisions, instrumentalities, or agencies, including government-owned or controlled corporations and their subsidiaries. This provision also applies to career officers whose resignation, tendered in line with the existing policy, had been accepted.

Section 17.

Until the Congress provides otherwise, the President shall receive an annual salary of three hundred thousand pesos; the Vice-President, the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, two hundred forty thousand pesos each; the Senators, the Members of the House of Representatives, the Associate Justices of the Supreme Court, and the Chairmen of the Constitutional Commissions, two hundred four thousand pesos each; and the Members of the Constitutional Commissions, one hundred eighty thousand pesos each.

Section 18.

At the earliest possible time, the Government shall increase the salary scales of the other officials and employees of the National Government.

Section 19.

All properties, records, equipment, buildings, facilities, and other assets of any office or body abolished or reorganized under Proclamation No. 3 dated March 25, 1986 or this Constitution shall be transferred to the office or body to which its powers, functions, and responsibilities substantially pertain.

Section 20.

The first Congress shall give priority to the determination of the period for the full implementation of free public secondary education.

Section 21.

The Congress shall provide efficacious procedures and adequate remedies for the reversion to the State of all lands of the public domain and real rights connected therewith which were acquired in violation of the Constitution or the public land laws, or through corrupt practices. No transfer or disposition of such lands or real rights shall be allowed until after the lapse of one year from the ratification of this Constitution.

Section 22.

At the earliest possible time, the Government shall expropriate idle or abandoned agricultural lands as may be defined by law, for distribution to the beneficiaries of the agrarian reform program.

Section 23.

Advertising entities affected by paragraph (2), Section 11 of Article XVI of this Constitution shall have five years from its ratification to comply on a graduated and proportionate basis with the minimum Filipino ownership requirement therein.

Section 24.

Private armies and other armed groups not recognized by duly constituted authority shall be dismantled. All paramilitary forces including Civilian Home Defense Forces not consistent with the citizen armed force established in this Constitution, shall be dissolved or, where appropriate, converted into the regular force.

Section 25.

After the expiration in 1991 of the Agreement between the Republic of the Philippines and the United States of America concerning military bases, foreign military bases, troops, or facilities shall not be allowed in the Philippines except under a treaty duly concurred in by the Senate and, when the Congress so requires, ratified by a majority of the votes cast by the people in a national referendum held for that purpose, and recognized as a treaty by the other contracting State.

Section 26.

The authority to issue sequestration or freeze orders under Proclamation No. 3 dated March 25, 1986 in relation to the recovery of ill-gotten wealth shall remain operative for not more than eighteen months after the ratification of this Constitution. However, in the national interest, as certified by the President, the Congress may extend such period. A sequestration or freeze order shall be issued only upon showing of a prima facie case. The order and the list of the sequestered or frozen properties shall forthwith be registered with the proper court. For orders issued before the ratification of this Constitution, the corresponding judicial action or proceeding shall be filed within six months from its ratification. For those issued after such ratification, the judicial action or proceeding shall be commenced within six months from the issuance thereof. The sequestration or freeze order is deemed automatically lifted if no judicial action or proceeding is commenced as herein provided.

Section 27.

This Constitution shall take effect immediately upon its ratification by a majority of the votes cast in a plebiscite held for the purpose and shall supersede all previous Constitutions.


The foregoing proposed Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines was approved by the Constitutional Commission of 1986 on the twelfth day of October, Nineteen hundred and eighty-six.

ORDINANCE APPORTIONING THE SEATS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CONGRESS OF THE PHILIPPINES TO THE DIFFERENT LEGISLATIVE DISTRICTS IN PROVINCES AND CITIES AND THE METROPOLITAN MANILA AREA

Section 1.

For purposes of the election of Members of the House of Representatives of the First Congress of the Philippines under the Constitution proposed by the 1986 Constitutional Commission and subsequent elections, and until otherwise provided by law, the Members thereof shall be elected from legislative districts apportioned among the provinces, cities, and the Metropolitan Manila Area as follows:

METROPOLITAN MANILA AREA

MANILA, six (6) –

  • First District: Barangays Nos. 1-146; North: City Boundary between Manila and Caloocan; East: From Estero de Sunog Apog south to Estero de Vitas, east to Tayuman Street, south to Railroad Tracks at Dagupan Street, then south to Claro M. Recto Avenue; Southeast: From Claro M. Recto Avenue west to Manila Bay; West: Manila Bay north to City boundary.
  • Second District: Barangays Nos. 147-267; North: City boundary between Manila and Caloocan; East: Rizal Avenue Extension south to Railroad Tracks at Antipolo Street, west to Estero de San Lazaro, south to C.M. Recto Avenue, west to bridge at Estero de la Reina; West: Estero de la Reina to Estero de Vitas to Estero Sunog Apog.
  • Third District: Barangays Nos. 268-394; North: City boundary between Manila and Caloocan; East: A. Bonifacio Street south to Dimasalang, to Andalucia, Claro M. Recto Avenue east to Estero de San Miguel at Pasig River; South: Mouth of Estero de San Miguel west to Del Pan Bridge and Street; West: Del Pan Street north to Claro M. Recto Extension to Estero de San Lazaro.
  • Fourth District: Barangays Nos. 395 – 586; Southwest: Estero de San Miguel to Mendiola Bridge, to C.M. Recto Avenue to Quezon Boulevard; West: Quezon Boulevard, Andalucia, Dimasalang to Manila/Quezon City boundary; Northeast: City boundary to Ramon Magsaysay Boulevard; Southeast: Ramon Magsaysay Boulevard to V. Mapa Street; South: Ramon Magsaysay Boulevard at Estero de San Miguel.
  • Fifth District: Barangays Nos. 649-828; North: Mouth of Pasig River to Paz M. Guanzon Street to Estero de Pandacan; Northeast: Estero de Pandacan to Pedro Gil Street to Tejeron Street to Manila/Makati boundary; Southeast: City boundary to Estero de Tripa de Gallina; South: Pasay/Manila boundary to Roxas Boulevard to reclaimed areas at Manila Bay; West: Manila Bay.
  • Sixth District: Barangays Nos. 587-648; and 829-905; North: Mouth of Estero de San Miguel east to Mendiola Bridge to Ramon Magsaysay Boulevard to Manila/Quezon City boundary; Northeast: City boundary of Manila, San Juan, and Quezon City; East: Manila-San Juan-Mandaluyong-Makati boundaries to Tejeron Street; Southeast: Tejeron Street to Pedro Gil Street; Southwest & West: Estero de Pandacan north to Paz M. Guanzon Street to Pasig River.

QUEZON CITY, four (4) –

  • First District: Barangays Del Monte, Paltok, Bungad, San Antonio, Katipunan, Veterans Village, Talayan, Damayan, Mariblo, Paraiso, Sta. Cruz, Nayong Kanluran, Philam, West Triangle, N.S. Amoranto, San Isidro Labrador, Sta. Teresita, Salvacion, Maharlika, St. Peter, Lourdes, Sto. Domingo, Sienna, San Jose, Manresa, Pag-ibig sa Nayon, Balingasa, Masambong, Damar, Bahay Toro, St. Cristo, Ramon Magsaysay, Project 6, Vasra, Alicia, and Bagong Pag-asa.
  • Second District: Barangays Fairview, New Era, Holy Spirit, Batasan Hills, Commonwealth, Payatas, Bagong Silangan, Sauyo, Talipapa, Bagbag, San Bartolome, Sta. Lucia, Gulod, Novaliches Proper, San Agustin, Nagkaisang Nayon, Sta. Monica, Kaligayahan, Pasong Putik, Apolonio Samson, Unang Sigaw, Tandang Sora, Pasong Tamo, Culiat, Baesa, Capri, Balumbato, and Sangandaan.
  • Third District: Barangays E. Rodriguez, Silangan, Quirino 3-A, Duyan-Duyan, Quirino 3-B, Amihan, Socorro, San Roque, Manga, Zobel Dioquino, Tagumpay, Aguinaldo, Escopa 1, Escopa 2, Escopa 3, Escopa 4, West Kamias, East Kamias, Quirino 2 A, Quririno 2 B, Quirino 2 C, Ugong Norte, Bagumbayan, Libis, Villa Maria Clara, Masagana, Milagrosa, Marilag, Bagumbayan, Loyola Heights, Pansol, and Matandang Balara.
  • Fourth District: Barangays Bagong Lipunan, Kaunlaran, San Martin, Immaculate Concepcion, South Triangle, Sacred Heart, Laging Handa, Paligsahan, Obrero, Roxas, Kamuning, Kanluran, Kamuning Silangan, Tatalon, Don Manuel, Dona Josefa, San Isidro, Dona Aurora, Santo Nino, Santol, Dona Imelda, Kristong Hari, Kalusugan, Damayang Lagi, Mariana, Valencia, Horseshoe, Pinagkaisahan, San Vicente, U.P. Campus, Krus Na Ligas, Central, Old Capital Site, U.P. Village, Teacher’s East, Teacher’s West, Sikatuna, Malaya, Pinahan, and Botocan.

CALOOCAN CITY, two (2) –

  • First District: 70 Barangays; All of Caloocan North EDSA.
  • Second District: 118 Barangays; All of Caloocan South EDSA.

ADDITIONAL METRO MANILA DISTRICTS:

  • PASAY CITY: one (1)
  • MALABON and NAVOTAS: one (1)
  • SAN JUAN and MANDALUYONG: one (1)
  • MARIKINA: one (1)
  • MAKATI: one (1)
  • PASIG: one (1)
  • PARANAQUE: one (1)
  • LAS PINAS and MUNTINGLUPA: one (1)
  • PATEROS and TAGUIG: one (1)
  • VALENZUELA: one (1)

MEMBERS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COMMISSION

President: Cecilia Munoz Palma
Vice-President: Ambrosio B. Padilla
Floor Leader: Napoleon G. Rama
Assistant Floor Leaders: Ahmad Domocao Alonto and Jose D. Calderon

Commissioners: Yusuf R. Abubakar, Felicitas S. Aquino, Adolfo S. Azcuna, Teodoro C. Bacani, Jose F. S. Bengzon, Jr., Ponciano L. Bennagen, Joaquin G. Bernas, Florangel Rosario Braid, Crispino M. de Castro, Jose C. Colayco, Roberto R. Concepcion, Hilario G. Davide, Jr., Vicente B. Foz, Edmundo G. Garcia, Jose Luis Martin C. Gascon, Serafin V.C. Guingona, Alberto M. K. Jamir, Jose B. Laurel, Jr., Eulogio R. Lerum, Regalado E. Maambong, Christian S. Monsod, Teodulo C. Natividad, Ma. Teresa F. Nieva, Jose N. Nolledo, Blas F. Ople, Minda Luz M. Quesada, Florenz D. Regalado, Rustico F. de los Reyes, Jr., Cirilo A. Rigos, Francisco A. Rodrigo, Ricardo J. Romulo, Decoroso R. Rosales, Rene V. Sarmiento, Jose E. Suarez, Lorenzo M. Sumulong, Jaime S. L. Tadeo, Christine O. Tan, Gregorio J. Tingson, Efrain B. Trenas, Lugum L. Uka, Wilfrido V. Villacorta, Bernardo M. Villegas.

Attested by: Flerida Ruth P. Romero, Secretary-General.

FREE DOWNLOADS
1987 Philippine Constitution DOC
1987 Philippine Constitution PDF

VP Sara Duterte inutusan ng House na sumagot sa loob ng 10 araw tungkol sa impeachment

“Madam Chair, in view of the finding of the sufficiency in substance of the two impeachment complaints, I move to issue notice to the Vice President or the respondent of the impeachment complaints to file her answer to the impeachment complaints within a non-extendable period of 10 calendar days from receipt of this notice.” ~Ysabel Maria Zamora

Tuluyan nang umusad ang impeachment proceedings laban kay Bise Presidente Sara Duterte matapos aprubahan ng House panel ang dalawang reklamo laban sa kanya. Noong March 4, 2026, bumoto ang House committee on justice pabor sa sufficiency in substance ng mga naturang reklamo.

Dahil sa desisyong ito, kailangang magpaliwanag ng Bise Presidente sa harap ng mga mambabatas tungkol sa mga alegasyon. Mahalaga ang hakbang na ito dahil ito ang magsasabi kung may basehan ang mga akusasyon para sa isang paglilitis.

Sa kabuuan, limampu’t apat na mambabatas ang sumang-ayon na ituloy ang kaso laban sa Bise Presidente. Tanging si Quezon City Representative Bong Suntay lamang ang bumoto ng “no” sa naturang pagtitipon.

Walang sinuman sa mga miyembro ng komite ang nag-abstain o tumangging bumoto sa nasabing usapin. Pinamunuan ni Batangas Representative Gerville “Jinky” Luistro ang hearing upang matiyak ang kaayusan ng proseso.

Ngayon ay mas malapit na ang publiko sa pagsusuri ng mga ebidensiya sa mga darating na pagdinig.

Dalawang Reklamo ang Pumasa sa House Panel

Ang ikatlong reklamo ay nagmula sa grupo ng mga clergy at lawyers na pinamumunuan ni Father Joel Saballa. Inendorso naman ni Mamamayang Liberal Party-list Representative Leila de Lima ang nasabing petisyon sa harap ng komite.

Samantala, ang ikaapat na reklamo ay inihain ni Atty. Nathaniel Cabrera para sa pagsusuri ng mga mambabatas. Sinuportahan ito nina Representative Bienvenido Abante Jr. at Deputy Speaker Paolo Ortega V mula sa La Union.

Dahil dito, dalawang magkahiwalay na kaso ang kailangang harapin ni Duterte sa House of Representatives. Matatandaang may apat na orihinal na reklamo ang inihain laban sa Bise Presidente sa mga nakaraang buwan.

Gayunpaman, binawi ng grupong Tindig Pilipinas ang kanilang petisyon upang mas mapabilis ang buong proseso. Isinantabi rin ng komite ang reklamo mula sa Makabayan Coalition dahil sa paglabag sa one-year bar rule.

Ang panuntunang ito ay nagbabawal ng higit sa isang impeachment proceeding laban sa isang opisyal sa loob ng isang taon. Sa huli, ang ikatlo at ikaapat na reklamo lamang ang nanatiling aktibo at balido sa ngayon.

Mga Matitinding Alegasyon at ang Isyu ng SALN

Maraming mabibigat na basehan ang nakapaloob sa mga reklamo tulad ng maling paggamit ng confidential funds. May mga akusasyon din ng suhulan sa Department of Education noong siya pa ang nakaupong kalihim nito.

Bukod dito, binanggit sa mga dokumento ang umano’y planong pagpaslang sa ilang matataas na opisyal ng gobyerno. Kasama sa mga pinagbabantaan diumano ay si President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. at ang First Lady.

Ang mga ito ay itinuturing na culpable violation of the Constitution at betrayal of public trust.

Sa kasagsagan ng pagdinig, ipinakita ni Representative Terry Ridon ang mga dokumento tungkol sa yaman ng Bise Presidente. Ipinunto niya na lumaki ang net worth ni Duterte mula labing-walong milyong piso patungong walumpu’t walong milyong piso.

Nagkaroon ng mainit na diskusyon nang tanungin ni Representative Rufus Rodriguez kung kumpirmado ba ang mga dokumentong ito. Sinabi ni Ridon na ang mga datos na ito ay bahagi ng public record mula sa kanyang mga SALN.

Ayon kay Chair Luistro, ang mga ganitong pahayag ay magiging basehan ng desisyon ng mga miyembro.

Debate sa Katotohanan at ang Papel ni Ramil Madriaga

Kinuwestiyon din ni Representative Bong Suntay ang kredibilidad ni Ramil Madriaga na nagsasabing siya ay dating bagman. Nagtanong si Suntay kung mayroon bang sapat na patunay na nagtrabaho nga si Madriaga para kay Duterte.

Sumagot naman si Leila de Lima at sinabing hindi pa ito ang oras para humusga sa mga saksi. Ayon sa kanya, ang layunin ng kasalukuyang hakbang ay alamin lamang kung sapat ang nilalaman ng reklamo. Binigyang-diin niya na ang mga ebidensiya ay ilalatag sa tamang panahon ng paglilitis.

Nagpahayag din si De Lima ng pagdududa sa timing ng pagsasampa ni Duterte ng perjury complaint laban kay Madriaga. Sinabi niya na matagal na ang affidavit ni Madriaga ngunit ngayon lamang kumilos ang kampo ng Bise Presidente.

Naniniwala siya na ginawa ito upang maimpluwensiyahan ang boto ng mga mambabatas sa araw na iyon. Gayunpaman, hindi ito naging hadlang sa naging desisyon ng nakararaming miyembro ng komite.

Sa huli, nanaig ang desisyon na ituloy ang pagsusuri sa mga seryosong akusasyong ito.

Ang Susunod na Kabanata sa Impeachment Process

Dahil sa naging resulta ng botohan, maglalabas na ng opisyal na notice ang komite para sa Bise Presidente. Mayroon lamang sampung araw si Duterte upang sagutin ang lahat ng mga akusasyong ipinupukol sa kanya.

Ang panahong ito ay non-extendible o hindi na maaaring dagdagan pa ayon sa mga alituntunin. Kung hindi siya sasagot, ituturing itong pagtanggi sa lahat ng mga alegasyong nakasulat sa reklamo.

Matapos nito, bibigyan din ng pagkakataon ang mga nagrereklamo na magsumite ng kanilang tugon.

Ang buong proseso sa loob ng komite ay dapat matapos sa loob ng animnapung araw na may sesyon. Pagkatapos ng mga hearing, gagawa ang Justice Committee ng ulat at rekomendasyon para sa buong Kongreso.

Kailangan ng hindi bababa sa one-third vote ng lahat ng miyembro ng Kamara upang maipadala ang kaso sa Senado. Sa Senado gaganapin ang pormal na paglilitis kung saan magsisilbing mga hukom ang mga Senador.

Bangayan ni Erice at Garin sa ‘interference’ ni Sandro Marcos

0

“I was accompanied by the Minority Leader at tinanong niya ako mismo, “Bakit ako nagsalita ng ganoon?” Wala na ba akong karapatang magsalita bilang miyembro ng Minorya? Madalas akong sabihan ni Minority Leader Libanan na tumatawag si Sandro at nagrereklamo sa mga salita ko. Kahapon, kinausap niya ako at sabi niya hindi na niya kaya ang pressure ng itaas.” ~Egay Erice

Tinanggal sa pwesto si Egay Erice bilang Senior Deputy Minority Leader matapos niyang batikusin ang administrasyong Marcos at isiwalat ang umano’y pakikialam ni Majority Leader Sandro Marcos sa Minority group.

Sa isang privilege speech sa Batasang Pambansa, idetalye ni Erice ang mga dahilan ng kanyang pag-alis sa posisyon.

Binigyang-diin niya na walang malinaw na basehan ang pagkakasibak sa kanya maliban sa kanyang tuloy-tuloy na mga kritisismo.

Sa kabila nito, maluwag niyang tinanggap ang paghalili ni dating Senator Leila de Lima sa kanyang pwesto.

Naniniwala si Erice na may conflict of interest dahil ang anak ng Pangulo ang nagsisilbing Majority Leader.

“Sinita ako ni Congressman Marcos. I replied that the anti-political dynasty advocacy has long been one of my advocacies. Ngunit sinabi niya, “Hindi, inaatake mo ang aking ama”. Ang sagot ko, ang kritisismo ay nakakatulong upang maituwid ang mga pagkakamali kung bukas ang isip ng mga nakikinig.”

Ayon sa kanya, ang sitwasyong ito ay nagreresulta sa labis na pagprotekta sa mga polisiya ng kasalukuyang administrasyon.

Dahil dito, nagkakaroon umano ng hindi tamang pressure sa liderato ng Minority group. Ito ang nakikitang dahilan kung bakit kailangang magkaroon ng pagbabago sa kanilang hanay.

Interference ni Sandro Marcos

Ayon sa mga pahayag sa plenaryo, pinatawag si Erice sa opisina ni Majority Leader Sandro Marcos kasama si Minority Leader Nonoy Libanan.

Sa nasabing pagpupulong, kinuwestiyon umano ang mga naging talumpati ni Erice laban sa ama ng Majority Leader.

Sinabi rin ni Erice na madalas tumatawag ang batang Marcos kay Libanan para magreklamo sa kanyang mga salita.

“Nagpapasalamat din po ako kay Minority Leader Nonoy Libanan. Alam ko po na nakatali ang kanyang mga kamay. Malaki na rin po ang kanyang sakripisyo sapagkat madalas siyang tinatawagan ni Majority Leader Sandro Marcos dahil sa aking tuloy-tuloy na kritisismo sa mga polisiya ng administrasyong Marcos.”

Ito ang itinuturong dahilan kung bakit hindi na kinaya ng liderato ng Minority ang pressure mula sa itaas.

Bundat’ Anti-Dynasty Bill

Maliban sa isyu ng posisyon, tinalakay din ni Erice ang umano’y maanomalyang paggamit ng pondo ng bayan.

Binanggit niya ang paglipat ng mahigit 1.45 trillion pesos sa mga budget mula 2023 hanggang 2025.

>MORE: ‘Desire’ at ‘imagination’ ni Bong Suntay kay Anne Curtis, example sa hearing

Dahil dito, naapektuhan ang mga pondo para sa PhilHealth, PDIC, at mga maintenance ng pambansang kalsada.

“And so I ask: why did President Marcos allow this? Why did his cabinet remain silent?”

Binatikos din niya ang inaprubahang bersyon ng Anti-Political Dynasty Bill sa komite.

“Bakit ko nasabing “bundat”? Simple lang po. Ang proposal ay travesty of the Constitution dahil papayagan ang maraming magkakamag-anak na tumakbo sa iba’t ibang posisyon.”

Para sa kanya, ang nasabing panukala ay lalong magpapalakas sa mga dinastiya sa halip na pigilan ang mga ito.

Pagtatanggol ni Janet Garin

Sumagot naman si Deputy Speaker Janet Garin at sinabing dapat ayusin ng Minority ang kanilang sariling problema.

“Accusing the Majority of meddling in their affairs or voting is something that I cannot accept. Blaming the Majority Leader or members of the Majority for what happened in their change of leadership is unparliamentary and uncalled for. Please spare us, the Majority.”

Iginiit ni Garin na hindi dapat idawit ang Majority sa usapin ng pagpili ng mga opisyal ng kabilang grupo.

Hirit ni Marcoleta

Samantala, nagpahayag naman ng suporta si Congressman Paolo Marcoleta sa naging paninindigan ni Erice sa plenaryo.

Kinilala ni Marcoleta ang kahalagahan ng pagkakaroon ng tunay na boses ng oposisyon para sa check and balance.

Binanggit din niya na naranasan din ng kanyang pamilya ang katulad na panggigipit sa mga nakaraang taon.

“I share the views of the distinguished colleague na parang tayo po ay pinipigilang magsalita dito. Iyon din ang karanasan ng aking ama nung siya ay tinanggalan ng committee memberships dahil nagsalita siya laban sa House leadership noon. Nararamdaman ko rin iyan kapag pinuputol ako sa plenaryo o sa mga committee.”

Sa huli, nanatiling matatag si Erice na magsisilbi siyang equalizer sa House of Representatives kahit wala na sa posisyon.

‘Desire’ at ‘imagination’ ni Bong Suntay kay Anne Curtis, example sa hearing

“Alam mo minsan nasa Shangri-La ako. Nakita ko si Anne Curtis. Ang ganda-ganda pala niya. You know, may desire sa loob ko na nag-init talaga. Na-imagine ko na lang kung anong pwedeng mangyari. Pero siyempre, hanggang imagination na lang ‘yon. Pero hindi naman siguro ako pwedeng kasuhan dahil kung ano-ano ina-imagine ko, eh.” ~ Cong. Bong Suntay

Binura ng House Justice Committee ang naging pahayag ni Congressman Bong Suntay tungkol sa kanyang imahinasyon sa aktres na si Anne Curtis.

Naganap ang insidenteng ito sa gitna ng isang seryosong pagdinig tungkol sa isyu ng sedisyon at decorum. Ang mabilis na aksyon ng komite ay naglalayong panatilihin ang dignidad ng mga mambabatas sa loob ng Kamara.

Naniniwala ang nakararami na hindi angkop ang mga salitang ginamit ng kongresista sa opisyal na record.

Pinagmulan ng Kontrobersya

Nagsimula ang usapin nang talakayin ni Suntay ang mga video patungkol sa Vice President at sedisyon. Binanggit din niya ang konsepto ng designated survivor na ginagamit sa ibang bansa gaya ng United States.

Gayunpaman, biglang nagbahagi ang kongresista ng kanyang personal na karanasan sa isang hotel sa Shangri-la. Ikinuwento niya ang pagkagusto sa kagandahan ng sikat na aktres na si Anne Curtis sa nasabing lugar.

Inamin niya ang pagkakaroon ng matinding pagnanasa at malawak na imahinasyon habang pinapanood ang nasabing aktres.

Pagkukumpara kay Sara Duterte

Ikinuwento ni Suntay na noong makita niya ang aktres sa Shangri-la, nagkaroon siya ng “desire” at “imagination,” ngunit iginiit niya na hindi siya maaaring kasuhan dahil lamang sa kanyang mga naiisip.

Ginamit ni Congressman Bong Suntay ang analohiya tungkol kay Anne Curtis upang ipaliwanag na ang imahinasyon o iniisip ng isang tao ay hindi maituturing na krimen sa ilalim ng batas.

MORE | Jose Rizal: Kabayanihan, Pag-ibig, at Sakripisyo

Ayon sa kanya, ang presensya ni Vice President Sara Duterte sa mga rally at ang kanyang mga pahayag tungkol sa pagiging “designated survivor” ay hindi sapat na basehan para sa kasong sedisyon dahil maaaring nagbibiro lamang ang opisyal.

Layunin ng paghahambing na ito na ipakita na ang mga salita o kaisipan, hangga’t hindi nagreresulta sa aktwal na iligal na aksyon, ay hindi dapat ituring na kriminal.

Motion to Strike at Pagboto

Dahil dito, agad naghain ng mosyon si Honorable Zamora na burahin ang mga pahayag sa official record.

Nagkaroon ng kaunting pagtutol si Suntay dahil sa tingin niya ay wala siyang sinabing imoral.

Sa kabila nito, nagdesisyon ang komite na magsagawa ng pormal na botohan para sa naturang manifestation.

Labintatlong miyembro ang bumoto pabor sa pagtanggal ng mga salitang nabanggit mula sa official transcript.

Dalawang mambabatas lamang ang tumutol sa mosyon habang may dalawa ring nag-abstain sa naging proseso.

Women’s Month at Parliamentary Decorum

Nagpaalala ang si CongW Zamora tungkol sa kahalagahan ng pagrespeto sa kababaihan ngayong Women’s Month.

“With all due respect to my friend, Congressman Bong Suntay, it is just the start of the Women’s Month.”

“We are not censuring anything, but we are reminding them that, in fact, we should support women by not saying these statements.”

Binigyang-diin niya na ang mga ganitong pahayag ay hindi nakakatulong sa empowerment ng mga babae.

“I just wanted to say this, and this is about removing structural barriers to women’s empowerment, and things like this do not empower women.”

Sinabi naman ng Madam Chair na kailangang respetuhin ang sensitibidad ng bawat miyembro ng naturang komite.

Hiniling ni Suntay ang paglilinaw kung aling partikular na salita ang naging offensive sa kanyang mga kasamahan.

Gusto niyang malaman kung ang salitang desire o imagination ang naging problema para maging maingat sa susunod.

Desisyon ng Nakararami

Sa huli, nanatiling burado ang mga kontrobersyal na bahagi ng manifestation mula sa lahat ng official records.

“There is a motion to strike out from the record the earlier manifestation of the Honorable Suntay about his imagination upon seeing Anne Curtis. Do I hear a second? A second has been seconded.”

Nanindigan ang Madam Chair na ang boses ng nakararami ang dapat na palaging manaig sa usapin.

Ang insidenteng ito ay nagsisilbing paalala sa lahat ng mambabatas tungkol sa hangganan ng kanilang mga pahayag.

Kinuwestiyon ni Kaufman ang ICC sa pagpayag na maging star witnesses ang mga self-confessed criminals

For this wild assertion, the Prosecution relies once again on the evidence of criminals it has recruited, all of whom are inherently unreliable because of their being self-confessed vicious murderers, testifying in return for virtual immunity from proceedings at the ICC.” ~Nicholas Kaufman

Ang kredibilidad ng mga testigo laban kay dating Pangulong Rodrigo Duterte sa International Criminal Court ang pangunahing kinuwestiyon ng depensa sa pagpapatuloy ng pagdinig sa The Hague.

Sinabi ni Nicholas Kaufman na ang mga “star witnesses” ng prosekusyon ay mga self-confessed murderers na binigyan ng proteksyon.

Dahil dito, binigyang-diin ng depensa na hindi dapat pagkatiwalaan ang kanilang mga testimonya.

Naglabas din ng oral ruling si Judge Julia Motoc tungkol sa mga redactions sa transcript ng pagdinig.

Nilalayon nito na protektahan ang pagkakakilanlan ng mga biktima at testigo alinsunod sa Rome Statute.

Pinaalalahanan ng Chamber ang bawat panig na iwasan ang pagbanggit ng mga confidential information sa open session.

Questioning the “Virtual Certainty” of Common Plan

Kinuwestiyon ni Kaufman ang teorya ng prosekusyon tungkol sa pagkakaroon ng isang common plan sa war on drugs.

Ayon sa depensa, kailangang patunayan ang virtual certainty na ang kampanya ay hahantong sa mga pagpaslang.

Samantala, sa listahan ng 4,817 high-value targets, 248 lamang ang sinasabing naneutralize o napatay.

Ipinunto ng depensa na mayroon lamang 5% chance na mauwi sa kamatayan ang nasa kill list.

Kaya naman, hindi ito maituturing na virtual certainty sa ilalim ng mga naunang kaso sa korte.

Gayunpaman, binanggit din ni Kaufman na walang matibay na ebidensya ng direktang utos mula kay Duterte para sa 49 na insidente.

“As I have said: no smoking gun, no evidence of a direct order, solicitation or inducement with respect to any one of the 49 incidents. No documentary record exists of a presidential order.”

Reliability of Star Witnesses and Immunity

Bukod dito, kinuwestiyon ng depensa ang paggamit ng mga testigo na binigyan ng “statements of limited use”.

Ang mga kasunduang ito ay nagsisilbi umanong immunity para sa mga self-confessed killers kapalit ng kanilang testimonya.

Ayon kay Kaufman, ang ganitong sistema ay labag sa layunin ng Rome Statute na sugpuin ang impunity.

“Using the evidence of self-confessed murderers to obtain leads or develop evidence from other sources, I would suggest, is consistent with the Statute, as mentioned by Judge Betty Holler. To give a get-out-of-jail card, however, to a whole bunch of murderers in order to fix liability to another, albeit pre-selected individual also accused of murder, is, in my opinion, totally and wholly inconsistent with the object and purpose of the Rome Statute.” 

Ibinunyag din ng depensa ang umano’y pakikipagsabwatan ng ilang indibidwal sa gobyerno para kumuha ng mga testigo.

Mayroon umanong mga recorded conversation na nagpapakita ng pag-aayos ng pardon para sa mga kooperatibong testigo.

Sa kabilang banda, iginiit ni Kaufman na ang mga witness na ito ay sadyang ni-recruit para i-target si Duterte.

Inconsistencies in the 49 Incidents and Count One

Sa ilalim ng Count One para sa Davao Death Squad, ipinakita ng depensa ang mga pagkakaiba sa kwento ng mga testigo.

Halimbawa, nagkaiba ang mga testigo sa taon ng insidente, bilang ng biktima, at paraan ng pagpatay, ayon kay Kaufman.

“As we know, the first cluster of incidents falling under Count One concerns the so-called and totally fictitious Davao Death Squad period. This concerns incidents one through nine. The Prosecution’s attribution theory here is straightforward: that Rodrigo Duterte as mayor authorized killings through intermediaries. But when the evidence for this count is examined, not one witness can say that he heard the mayor give an order to kill.

The attribution of criminality to Mr. Duterte arises for the most part out of assumption layered on top of hearsay, and follows a repetitive pattern which would, as a rule, entail the same mechanism of attribution. Namely, a hitman witness for the Prosecution would state that his handler said that clearance came from “above”. But what does the word “above” mean? It means an unnamed superior and nothing more.”

Iginiit ng depensa na ang terminong “above” na ginamit ng mga testigo ay hindi sapat na ebidensya laban sa dating pangulo.

Ayon sa kanila, ang salitang ito ay tumutukoy lamang sa isang hindi pinangalanang superior at wala nang iba pa.

Hindi rin napatunayan ng prosekusyon ang pagkakaroon ng isang stable na chain of command sa Davao City.

Dahil sa mga internal inconsistencies na ito, iginiit ng depensa na mahina ang kaso laban sa dating pangulo.

Bilang pagtatapos, hiniling ng depensa sa Chamber na huwag ituloy ang trial para sa 49 na insidente dahil sa kakulangan ng ebidensya.

Binigyang-diin nila ang anim na kahinaan ng prosekusyon, kabilang ang pagdepende sa mga kriminal na testigo at hearsay.

Jose Rizal: Kabayanihan, Pag-ibig, at Sakripisyo

0

“Mas mabuti pang mamatay nang may dangal kaysa mabuhay nang walang puri.” ~Jose Rizal

Si José Protasio Rizal Mercado y Alonso Realonda ay ang kinikilalang Pambansang Bayani ng Pilipinas. Isinilang siya noong Hunyo 19, 1861 at pumanaw noong Disyembre 30, 1896. Siya ay isang mahusay na manggagamot, manunulat, at tanyag na henyo sa maraming larangan. Ang kaniyang mga nobela ay naging mitsa ng paggising ng damdaming nasyonalismo. Ipinaglaban niya ang kalayaan sa pamamagitan ng kapayapaan at hindi sa dahas. Dahil sa kaniyang sakripisyo, nagkaisa ang mga Pilipino laban sa kolonyalismo ng Espanya.

Quick Facts

  • Buong Pangalan: José Protasio Rizal Mercado y Alonso Realonda.
  • Ibang Pangalan: Pepe, Dimasalang, Laong Laan.
  • Kapanganakan: Hunyo 19, 1861, sa Calamba, Laguna.
  • Kamatayan: Disyembre 30, 1896, sa Bagumbayan, Maynila.
  • Nasyonalidad: Pilipino.
  • Trabaho: Manggagamot (Ophthalmologist), Manunulat, Guro, Magsasaka, Inhenyero.
  • Kilala sa: Pambansang Bayani ng Pilipinas at “Father of the Philippine Homeland”.
  • Mga Akda: Noli Me Tangere, El Filibusterismo, Mi Ultimo Adios.

Early Life and Education

Si Rizal ay ang pampito sa labing-isang anak nina Francisco Mercado at Teodora Alonso. Ang kaniyang pamilya ay kabilang sa pangkat na principalia o mga mayayaman sa Calamba. Sa edad na tatlo, tinuruan siya ng kaniyang ina ng abakada at mga dasal. Pinatunayan ni Doña Teodora na siya ang unang guro na humubog sa kaniyang hilig sa sining. Bukod dito, ang kaniyang mga tito ay tumulong din sa kaniyang pisikal at mental na pag-unlad.

Noong 1869, ipinadala si Rizal sa Biñan upang mag-aral sa ilalim ni Justiniano Aquino Cruz. Kahit maliit siya para sa kaniyang edad, dinaig niya ang kaniyang mga kaklase sa lahat ng asignatura. Noong 1872, pumasok siya sa Ateneo Municipal de Manila kung saan siya ay naging “Emperor” ng klase. Nagtapos siya doon noong 1877 na may markang sobresaliente o napakahusay. Kasunod nito, kumuha siya ng Medisina sa Unibersidad ng Santo Tomas dahil sa lumalalang katarata ng kaniyang ina.

Si Justiniano Aquino Cruz ang nagsilbing unang pormal na guro ni Jose Rizal noong siya ay siyam na taong gulang pa lamang sa Biñan, Laguna. Inilarawan siya ni Rizal bilang isang lalaking matangkad, payat, may mahabang leeg, matangos na ilong, at medyo nakayukong katawan, na karaniwang nakasuot ng kamisang sinamay mula sa Batangas. Siya ay isang mahigpit na disiplinaryo na madalas gumagamit ng disiplinang pisikal, gaya ng pamamalo ng patpat o ferule sa mga kamay o likod ng mga mag-aaral na nagkakamali, ngunit kinilala rin siya sa kaniyang husay at pagkabisado sa balarilang Espanyol nina Nebrija at Gainza.

Sa kabila ng kalupitang naranasan, naging napakahusay ni Rizal sa ilalim ng kaniyang gabay at sa loob lamang ng ilang buwan ay nahigitan niya ang lahat ng kaniyang mga kamag-aral sa mga asignatura tulad ng Espanyol at Latin. Dahil sa husay ni Rizal at sa naging karanasan din ng kuya nitong si Paciano bilang dating mag-aaral ni Maestro Justiniano, kalaunan ay pinayuhan ng guro ang mga magulang ng bayani na pag-aralin na ang bata sa Maynila.

Sa kabila ng kaniyang husay, naranasan ni Rizal ang diskriminasyon mula sa mga paring Dominikano. Dahil dito, lihim siyang naglakbay patungong Espanya noong 1882 upang ipagpatuloy ang kaniyang pag-aaral. Tinapos niya ang kursong Medisina at Pilosopiya sa Universidad Central de Madrid noong 1885. Nagpakadalubhasa rin siya sa ophthalmology sa Paris at Heidelberg upang gamutin ang mga mata ng kaniyang ina. Naging bihasa rin siya sa pagsasalita ng dalawampu’t dalawang wika at diyalekto.

Bilang isang tao, si Rizal ay kilala sa kaniyang disiplina at maayos na pamumuhay. Mayroon siyang habit na gumawa ng iskedyul para sa bawat oras ng kaniyang araw. Mahilig din siyang magbasa ng mga nobela gaya ng The Count of Monte Cristo. Ang kaniyang ugali ay seryoso ngunit may kakayahang humanga sa kagandahan ng kalikasan. Naniniwala siya na ang edukasyon ang susi sa pag-unlad ng bansa.

Rise to Prominence

Ang unang malaking hakbang ni Rizal sa kasaysayan ay ang paglalathala ng Noli Me Tangere noong 1887. Isinulat niya ang nobelang ito sa Berlin sa tulong ni Dr. Maximo Viola. Ang aklat na ito ay tahasang bumabatikos sa maling pamamahala ng mga Espanyol at mga prayle. Naging mitsa ito ng kamulatan ng mga Pilipino tungkol sa kanilang tunay na kalagayan. Dahil dito, kinilala siya bilang nangungunang tinig ng Kilusang Propaganda.

Sa Europe, naging aktibo si Rizal sa pagsulat para sa pahayagang La Solidaridad. Ginamit niya ang kaniyang talino upang hilingin ang pantay na karapatan para sa mga Pilipino. Noong 1891, inilathala niya ang El Filibusterismo bilang sequel o kasunod ng kaniyang unang nobela. Ang aklat na ito ay nagbigay-diin sa “paghahari ng kasakiman” sa ilalim ng kolonyalismo. Kahit mapanganib, bumalik siya sa Pilipinas noong 1892 upang itatag ang La Liga Filipina.

Major Contributions

Si Rizal ay nakapag-ambag sa iba’t ibang larangan na naging mahalaga sa kasaysayan ng Pilipinas:

Literatura at Pananaliksik

  • Noli Me Tangere (1887) at El Filibusterismo (1891): Ang mga nobelang ito ang nagmulat sa nasyonalismo ng mga Pilipino.
  • Anotasyon ng Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas (1890): Ipinakita niya na may sariling kultura na ang mga Pilipino bago pa ang mga Kastila.
  • Mga tula at sanaysay: Gaya ng “Sa Aking Mga Kabata” at “The Indolence of the Filipinos”.

Agham at Medisina

  • Ophthalmology: Naging tanyag siya sa paggamot sa mga mata at matagumpay na naoperahan ang kaniyang ina.
  • Pagtuklas ng mga Species: Sa Dapitan, nakatuklas siya ng bagong uri ng palaka, salagubang, at butiki.
  • Community Projects: Nagtayo siya ng sistema ng patubig, mga pailaw sa lansangan, at naglinis ng mga latian.

Edukasyon at Sibika

  • La Liga Filipina: Isang samahan na naglalayong pag-isahin ang bansa at itaguyod ang edukasyon at agrikultura.
  • Paaralan sa Dapitan: Nagturo siya ng matematika, wika, at sining sa mga kabataan nang walang bayad.

Philippine Revolution

Bagaman hindi direktang lumaban sa baril, si Rizal ang naging espiritwal na lider ng himagsikan. Ang kaniyang mga nobela ang naging inspirasyon ni Andres Bonifacio at ng Katipunan. Gayunpaman, tumanggi si Rizal na pamunuan ang madugong rebolusyon nang bisitahin siya ni Pio Valenzuela. Naniniwala siya na hindi pa handa ang bayan at mas mahalaga ang edukasyon kaysa sa dumanak ang dugo. Sa kabila nito, idinamit pa rin siya ng mga Espanyol sa pag-aalsa ng Katipunan.

Notable Life Stories

Ang Kwento ng Gamo-gamo

Isang gabi, habang tinuturuan siya ng kaniyang ina, napansin ni Rizal ang mga gamo-gamong lumilipad sa ilawan. Ang morale ng kwento ay dapat sumunod sa magulang upang hindi mapahamak. Ngunit para kay Rizal, ang pagkasunog ng gamo-gamo ay simbolo ng pag-aalay ng buhay para sa isang magandang liwanag. Ito ay nagpakita ng kaniyang kahandaang mamatay para sa kaniyang mithiin sa murang edad.

Unang Pakikipaglaban sa Biñan

Sa kaniyang unang araw sa paaralan sa Biñan, tinukso siya ng kaniyang kaklaseng si Pedro. Sa kabila ng pagiging maliit, hinamon ni Rizal si Pedro sa isang wrestling match. Dahil sa turo ng kaniyang Tio Manuel, natalo ni Rizal ang mas malaking bata. Dito nagsimulang makilala si Rizal hindi lamang sa talino kundi pati na rin sa kaniyang tapang.

Ang Kawalan ng Katarungan sa Kaniyang Ina

Noong 1871, si Doña Teodora ay maling binuhatan ng kaso ng pagtatangkang lasunin ang asawa ng kaniyang kapatid. Pinilit siyang maglakad ng 50 kilometro mula Calamba hanggang Santa Cruz, Laguna bilang parusa. Nakulong siya ng dalawa’t kalahating taon bago napatunayang walang sala. Ang pangyayaring ito ay nag-iwan ng matinding galit sa puso ni Rizal laban sa sistemang Espanyol.

Ang Pag-aalsa sa Cavite at Gomburza

Noong 1872, binitay ang tatlong paring martir na sina Gomez, Burgos, at Zamora. Ang kaniyang kapatid na si Paciano ay malapit kay Padre Burgos, kaya lubos itong nakaapekto sa kanila. Ang kawalang-katarungang ito ang nagmulat sa mga mata ni Jose upang labanan ang kolonyalismo. Inialay niya ang kaniyang ikalawang nobela sa alaala ng tatlong paring ito.

Ang Insidente ng “Pobres Frailes”

Noong 1892, si Rizal ay dinakip dahil sa bintang na may dalang mga pulyeto na pinamagatang “Pobres Frailes”. Ang mga papel na ito ay natagpuan sa kagamitan ng kaniyang kapatid na si Lucia. Ito ang naging dahilan upang ipatapon siya ni Gobernador-Heneral Despujol sa Dapitan. Pinaniniwalaang ang insidenteng ito ay isang set-up o plano upang mapatahimik ang bayani.

Ang Paglilingkod sa Kapwa habang nasa Dapitan

Sa halip na malungkot sa kaniyang pagpapatapon sa Dapitan, pinili ni Rizal na tulungan ang kaniyang komunidad. Nagtayo siya ng sariling paaralan at tinuruan ang mga lokal na kabataan ng wika at matematika. Gumawa rin siya ng sistema ng patubig at naglagay ng mga pailaw sa lansangan para sa taumbayan. Ipinakita niya na kahit nasa ilalim ng hirap, maaari pa ring maging produktibo at makatulong sa iba.

Ang Lihim na Mensahe sa Loob ng Alcohol Lamp

Bago ang kaniyang pagbitay, lihim na isinulat ni Rizal ang kaniyang huling tula na “Mi Ultimo Adios”. Itinago niya ang papel na ito sa loob ng isang alcohol cooking lamp na kaniyang ginagamit. Habang nagpapaalam sa kaniyang pamilya, ibinigay niya ito sa kaniyang kapatid na si Trinidad. Binanggit niya sa wikang English na mayroong “something inside” upang hindi maintindihan ng mga guwardiyang Espanyol.

Ang Katapangan sa Harap ng Kamatayan

Sa huling sandali ng kaniyang buhay sa Bagumbayan, nanatiling mahinahon at matapang ang ating pambansang bayani. Ayon sa mga tala, ang kaniyang tibok ng pulso ay normal at hindi nagpakita ng takot. Hiniling niya na mabaril nang paharap dahil hindi siya taksil, ngunit ang kaniyang likod lamang ang pinahintulutan. Sa kaniyang pagbagsak, pinihit niya ang kaniyang katawan upang humarap sa pagsikat ng araw sa langit.

Challenges, Controversies, and Criticism

Hinarap ni Rizal ang matinding panggigipit mula sa mga prayle dahil sa kaniyang mga isinulat. Ang kaniyang pamilya ay pinaalis sa kanilang lupain sa Calamba dahil sa alitang agraryo laban sa mga Dominikano. Maraming kritiko ang nagsasabing hindi siya tunay na rebolusyonaryo dahil tinanggihan niya ang marahas na hakbang ng Katipunan. Ngunit ipinaliwanag ni Rizal na hindi pa handa ang bansa para sa isang madugong labanan.

Isang malaking diskusyon sa kasaysayan ang tinatawag na “Retraction” ni Rizal sa bisperas ng kaniyang bitay. Sinasabi ng mga Heswita na bumalik siya sa pananampalatayang Katoliko bago mamatay. Gayunpaman, marami ring mga historyador ang nagdududa sa katotohanan ng dokumentong ito. Hanggang ngayon, ang isyung ito ay nananatiling isa sa pinakamalaking misteryo sa buhay ng bayani.

Personal Life

Si Rizal ay may malalim na pagmamahal sa kaniyang pamilya at bayan, ngunit mayroon din siyang makulay na buhay pag-ibig. Mayroong siyam na kababaihan na naiugnay sa kaniya sa kaniyang talaarawan. Pinakatanyag dito si Leonor Rivera, ang kaniyang kasintahan sa loob ng maraming taon na naging inspirasyon para kay Maria Clara. Sa huling bahagi ng kaniyang buhay, nakilala niya si Josephine Bracken sa Dapitan. Bagama’t hindi sila opisyal na ikinasal ng simbahan, itinuring niya itong asawa hanggang sa kaniyang huling sandali.

Narito ang makulay na buhay pag-ibig ni José Rizal na kinabibilangan ng sumusunod na kababaihan:

  • Julia (Abril 1877): Isang dalagitang taga-Los Baños na kaniyang unang paghanga noong siya ay 16 na taong gulang.
  • Segunda Katigbak (Disyembre 1877): Itinuturing na kaniyang unang pag-ibig ngunit ikinasal sa ibang lalaki.
  • Binibining L. (1877–1878): Isang guro mula sa Pakil, Laguna na niligawan niya upang pawiin ang sakit ng pagkabigo kay Segunda.
  • Leonor Valenzuela (1877–1882): Kapitbahay sa Intramuros na pinadadalhan niya ng mga liham gamit ang invisible ink.
  • Leonor Rivera (1880–1893): Ang kaniyang pinsan at pinakadakilang pag-ibig na naging inspirasyon para sa karakter na Maria Clara.
  • Consuelo Ortiga y Perez (1882–1883): Kastilang taga-Madrid na kaniyang pinaghandugan ng tula ngunit hindi pinatuloy ang panliligaw dahil sa katapatan kay Leonor.
  • O-Sei-San (1888): Isang Haponesang nagparanas sa kaniya ng pinakaromantikong bahagi ng kaniyang buhay sa Tokyo.
  • Gertrude Beckett (1888–1889): Anak ng kaniyang kasero sa London na tumulong sa kaniyang mga likhang sining.
  • Nelly Boustead (1889–1891): Anglo-Filipino na muntik na niyang pakasalan sa Biarritz, subalit naging hadlang ang usapin ng relihiyon.
  • Suzanne Jacoby (1890–1891): Isang Belgian na nakilala niya sa Brussels at nagkaroon sila ng panandaliang relasyon.
  • Josephine Bracken (1895–1896): Ang kaniyang naging asawa sa Dapitan na tinawag niyang “dulce extranjera” sa kaniyang huling tula.

Later Years and Death

Noong 1896, nagboluntaryo si Rizal bilang manggagamot para sa mga sundalong Espanyol sa Cuba. Habang naglalakbay, sumiklab ang himagsikang Pilipino at siya ay inaresto sa barko. Ipinabalik siya sa Maynila at ikinulong sa Fort Santiago sa paratang na rebelyon at sedisyon. Hinarap niya ang isang huwad na paglilitis na pinamunuan ng militar. Noong Disyembre 26, 1896, hinatulan siya ng kamatayan sa pamamagitan ng firing squad.

Noong umaga ng Disyembre 30, 1896, binaril si Rizal sa Bagumbayan. Sa kaniyang huling sandali, humiling siyang mabaril nang paharap ngunit tinanggihan ito. Sa kabila nito, pumihit siya habang bumabagsak upang harapin ang sumisikat na araw bilang tanda ng kaniyang pagiging tapat. Ang kaniyang kamatayan ay nagsilbing pinakamalakas na inspirasyon para sa tuluyang paglaya ng Pilipinas.

Legacy and Historical Impact

Ang kaisipan ni Rizal ay naging pundasyon ng demokrasya sa Pilipinas. Sa ilalim ng Republic Act 1425 o Rizal Law, obligadong pag-aralan ang kaniyang buhay at mga akda sa lahat ng paaralan. Maraming monumento ang itinayo para sa kaniya sa iba’t ibang panig ng mundo. Noong 2025, ipinangalan ang isang kalsada sa Queens, New York bilang Dr. José Rizal Way upang parangalan ang kaniyang mga mithiin. Itinuturing siyang “Father of the Philippine Homeland” dahil sa kaniyang pagbubuo ng nasyon sa pamamagitan ng talino.


Timeline of Key Events

  • 1861 – Isinilang sa Calamba, Laguna (Hunyo 19).
  • 1872 – Pumasok sa Ateneo Municipal de Manila.
  • 1877 – Nagtapos ng Bachelor of Arts sa Ateneo at pumasok sa UST.
  • 1882 – Lihim na naglakbay patungong Espanya upang mag-aral.
  • 1884 – Nakuha ang Degree of Licentiate in Medicine sa Madrid.
  • 1887 – Nalathala ang nobelang Noli Me Tangere sa Berlin.
  • 1891 – Nalathala ang nobelang El Filibusterismo sa Ghent, Belgium.
  • 1892 – Itinatag ang La Liga Filipina; Ipinatapon sa Dapitan.
  • 1896 – Inaresto, nilitis, at binaril sa Bagumbayan (Disyembre 30).

Selected Works

  • Noli Me Tangere (Novel, 1887) – Ipinakita ang sakit ng lipunan.
  • El Filibusterismo (Novel, 1891) – Sequel na tumalakay sa rebolusyon.
  • “Mi Último Adiós” (Poem, 1896) – Huling pamamaalam sa bayan.
  • “Sa Aking Mga Kababata” (Poem, 1869) – Pagmamahal sa sariling wika.
  • “To the Philippine Youth” (Poem, 1879) – Nanawagan sa kabataan.

Awards and Honors

  • Gold Medals at Sobresaliente marks sa lahat ng paksa sa Ateneo.
  • First Prize (Silver Pen) para sa “To the Philippine Youth” (1879).
  • Grand Prize para sa “El Consejo de los Dioses” (1880).
  • Idineklara bilang Pambansang Bayani ng Pilipinas.

Historical Assessment

Ayon sa mga iskolar, si Rizal ang unang Pilipinong nagtaglay ng pandaigdigang pananaw. Hindi lamang siya naging mitsa ng himagsikan kundi naging guro rin ng moralidad. Ibinabalanse ng kasalukuyang pagsusuri ang kaniyang pagiging repormista sa kaniyang ambag sa pag-unlad ng nasyonalismo. Sa kabila ng mga kontrobersya, nananatili siyang pinakamataas na huwaran ng pagmamahal sa bayan.

Jose Rizal completes his global intellectual journey from the Philippines to Europe between 1861 and 1896.
Jose Rizal’s scholarly journey from his honors at Ateneo de Manila to his medical and philosophy degrees earned at the Universidad Central de Madrid.

Lessons for Today’s Generation

Ang buhay ni Jose Rizal ay nagtuturo na ang tunay na pagbabago ay nakakamit sa pamamagitan ng talino at mapayapang paraan. Binigyang-diin niya na ang edukasyon ang pinakamabisang sandata upang labanan ang kawalan ng katarungan sa lipunan. Sa halip na dahas, ginamit ni Rizal ang kaniyang panulat at sining upang gisingin ang damdaming makabayan. Naniniwala siya na ang isang bansang edukado ay hindi kailanman mananatiling alipin ng kahit sinong mananakop. Ang aral na ito ay mahalaga pa rin hanggang sa kasalukuyan para sa ating pambansang pag-unlad,.

Ipinakita rin ni Rizal na ang disiplina sa sarili at pagsisikap ay susi sa pag-abot ng mga pangarap. Ang kaniyang sakripisyo at pag-ibig sa bayan ay nagsisilbing gabay upang unahin ang kapakanan ng mas nakararami. Bilang “pag-asa ng bayan,” hinikayat niya ang mga kabataan na gamitin ang kanilang talento para sa bansa. Ang pagiging marangal sa harap ng mga pagsubok ay isa sa mga katangiang dapat nating tularan sa kaniya. Sa huli, ang kaniyang kabayanihan ay nagpapaalala na ang pagmamahal sa katotohanan ay may malaking halaga sa buhay.

Trivia Questions

Narito ang 12 simpleng trivia questions tungkol sa buhay ni Jose Rizal para sa mga mag-aaral (ang tamang sagot ay nasa dulong bahagi):

  1. Kailan ipinanganak si Jose Rizal sa Calamba, Laguna? A. Hunyo 12, 1898 B. Hunyo 19, 1861 C. Disyembre 30, 1896 D. Agosto 21, 1983
  2. Ano ang kilalang palayaw ni Jose Rizal noong siya ay bata pa? A. Pepe B. Peping C. Pipoy D. Junior
  3. Sino ang naging unang guro ni Jose Rizal na nagturo sa kaniya ng alpabeto at dasal? A. Paciano Rizal B. Segunda Katigbak C. Binibining L. D. Teodora Alonso
  4. Sino ang guro ni Jose Rizal noong siya ay pinadala sa Biñan, Laguna para mag-aral? A. Jose Bech B. Francisco de Paula Sanchez C. Justiniano Aquino Cruz D. Leon Monroy
  5. Bakit nagpasiya si Jose Rizal na mag-aral ng medisina at magpakadalubhasa sa mata (ophthalmology)? A. Dahil ito ang gusto ng kaniyang ama B. Upang gamutin ang katarata ng kaniyang ina C. Para yumaman sa ibang bansa D. Dahil wala siyang ibang kurso na makuha
  6. Ano ang pamagat ng unang nobelang isinulat ni Rizal sa Berlin noong 1887? A. El Filibusterismo B. Mi Ultimo Adios C. Noli Me Tangere D. Sa Aking Mga Kababata
  7. Anong pangalan ang ginamit ni Rizal sa kaniyang pasaporte upang ilihim ang kaniyang pag-alis patungong Espanya? A. Jose Mercado B. Jose Protasio C. Jose Alonso D. Jose Realonda
  8. Saang lungsod at bansa ipinalimbag ni Jose Rizal ang kaniyang ikalawang nobela na El Filibusterismo? A. Berlin, Germany B. Madrid, Spain C. Paris, France D. Ghent, Belgium
  9. Anong samahan ang itinatag ni Rizal sa Tondo, Maynila noong Hulyo 3, 1892? A. Katipunan B. La Liga Filipina C. La Solidaridad D. Asociacion Hispano-Filipino
  10. Saang lugar sa Mindanao ipinatapon si Rizal ng mga Espanyol sa loob ng apat na taon? A. Dapitan B. Davao C. Butuan D. Cotabato
  11. Ano ang pamagat ng huling tula na isinulat ni Rizal sa loob ng Fort Santiago bago siya bitayin? A. Amor Patrio B. A La Juventud Filipina C. To the Flowers of Heidelberg D. Mi Ultimo Adios
  12. Saan binaril si Jose Rizal noong Disyembre 30, 1896? A. Fort Santiago B. Dapitan C. Bagumbayan (ngayon ay Luneta) D. Calamba

Sources

Aning, C. O. A. J. (2016, December 30). Follow Rizal’s lead, Filipinos told. INQUIRER.net. Conover, K. (2024, February 8). Remembering José Rizal, Filipino revolutionary. In Custodia Legis. Library of Congress.
DeStephano, M. (2011). José Rizal, the quest for Filipino independence, and the search for ultimate reality and meaning. Ultimate Reality and Meaning, 34(1–2), 113–129.
Hilotin, J. (2021, December 30). Jose Rizal: 12 facts you need to know about Philippines’ national hero. Gulf News.
Library of Congress. (2025, August 25). José Rizal – World of 1898: International perspectives on the Spanish American War.
National Commission for Culture and the Arts. (2015). Rizal, Jose. CulturEd: Philippine Cultural Education Online.
National Commission for Culture and the Arts. (n.d.). Selection and proclamation of national heroes and laws honoring Filipino historical figures.
Ravin, T. B. (2001). José Rizal: Philippine national hero and ophthalmologist. Archives of Ophthalmology, 119(2), 280–284.
Sicat, G. (2019, January 5). Jose Rizal’s ideals and ideas. Per Se.
Sutherland, D. (2025, October 27). José Rizal. Singapore Infopedia; National Library Board Singapore.
Vanguardia, M. H. O. P. (2023, January 21). José Rizal: The Life of the National Hero [Thesis, De La Salle University – Dasmariñas]. ResearchGate.
Viray, J. R., Rosales-Viray, K., & De Guia, E. (2026, February 16). Jose Rizal: Precursor of futures thinking in the Philippines. Journal of Futures Studies.

Mga Tamang Sagot:
1. B, 2. A, 3. D, 4. C, 5. B, 6. C, 7. A, 8. D, 9. B, 10. A, 11. D, 12. C

Resolusyon ni Cayetano VS ICC warrant na tinutulungan ng Marcos administration

0

“Ang nilalaman ng resolusyon na ito simple lang. Pag may warrant na hindi issued by a Philippine judge, kailangan po dumaan sa korte yan kung hindi unconstitutional yan.”

Isinusulong ni Senator Alan Peter Cayetano ang isang resolusyon para matiyak na walang Pilipinong isusuko sa mga dayuhang hukuman tulad ng ICC nang hindi muna dumadaan sa pagsusuri ng korte sa Pilipinas.

Binigyang-diin ng senador na ang Senate Resolution No. 307 ay isang mahalagang safeguard para protektahan ang karapatan ng bawat mamamayan sa ilalim ng ating Konstitusyon.

Layunin nito na magkaroon ng pagkakataon ang sinumang Pilipino na humingi ng remedy o tulong legal sa ating sariling mga hukom bago sila arestuhin ng dayuhang pwersa.

“Ano po gagawin natin lahat kung bukas, February 26, ang headline ay 25 PNP generals, 25 AFP generals, members of the Communist Party of the Philippines, several media practitioners, congressmen, senators, cabinet members, or the President of the Republic of the Philippines ay naissuan ng ICC and bigla na lang isasakay sa eroplano?”

Papayag ba tayong arestuhin na lang basta-basta ang ating men and women in uniform, senators, or congressmen?. What if the president today was Senator Bato or Senator Bong Go? Pwede na lang silang damputin and they cannot go to court.”

Constitutional Rights and Due Process

Ayon kay Cayetano, ang usaping ito ay hindi lamang para sa mga kilalang opisyal kundi para sa lahat ng Pilipino na maaaring harapin ang ganitong sitwasyon sa hinaharap.

Iginiit niya na ang sovereignty ng bansa ay dapat manaig pagdating sa pagprotekta sa kalayaan at karapatan ng ating mga kababayan.

Binanggit din niya bilang halimbawa ang mga bansang Canada, United Kingdom, at South Korea na may ganito ring proseso ng pagsusuri sa kanilang mga lokal na korte bago isagawa ang anumang surrender.

“In Canada, the ICC request for arrest is transmitted to the Minister of Justice, who authorizes the Attorney General to apply for a provisional arrest warrant before a judge. The judge will issue a warrant if the application meets prescribed criteria. The person arrested may be granted provisional liberty based on a judicial interim release order. In case of surrender, the minister may issue an authority to proceed to seek a court order for committal. A person may consent in writing before a judge to a committal; walang problema po pag pumayag yung tao. But the judge shall hold an extradition hearing—due process.”

Sa kanyang talumpati sa plenaryo noong February 25, 2026, ipinaliwanag ni Cayetano na ang resolusyon ay prospective at hindi nakatuon sa isang partikular na tao lamang tulad ni dating Pangulong Duterte.

Nilinaw niya na hindi ito tungkol sa drug war o sa kung dapat bang bumalik ang bansa sa Rome Statute ng ICC.

Protection for All Filipinos

Ang pangunahing punto ay ang pagsunod sa Section 2, Article 3 ng 1987 Constitution na nagbabawal sa hindi makatwirang pag-aresto nang walang utos mula sa isang lokal na judge.

Sinabi ni Cayetano na kailangang personal na suriin ng isang lokal na judge ang mga ebidensya para matukoy kung may probable cause bago payagan ang pagdakip sa isang Pilipino.

Nagbabala siya na kung basta na lang isasakay sa eroplano ang isang mamamayan nang walang court review ay mawawalan ng saysay ang ating judicial process at due process.

Ginamit niyang basehan ang mga prinsipyo ng international law kung saan kinikilala ang papel ng mga lokal na judicial authorities.

“All of us here agree pagdating sa West Philippine Sea, not a single inch of territory; hindi natin ipamimigay, atin ito. Sana naman po pagdating sa kapwa Pilipino ganun din: atin ito, kababayan natin ito, tao ito. Hindi dapat basta sino-surrender kahit may treaty, dahil yung treaty mismo nire-recognize ang ating judicial authorities”

Ipinunto rin ng senador ang panganib kung ang mga matataas na opisyal ng gobyerno, pulis, o militar ay bigla na lamang huhulihin ng ICC nang walang pagkakataong lumapit sa korte.

“Bato… Bong Go.”

Aniya, kailangang irespeto ang soberanya ng bansa dahil ang problema ng Pilipino ay dapat resolbahin sa loob ng Pilipinas hangga’t kaya ito ng ating sistema.

“Nakakalimutan ng marami na sovereignty is an essential part of international relations and international law. Kasama doon ang pagrespeto sa sovereignty. Ang problema ng Pilipino ay problema ng Pilipino. Yes, may crimes against humanity na problema ng buong mundo, pero mismong Rome Statute ang nagsasabing: sandali lang, kung ginawa sa Pilipinas yan at kaya niyo sa Pilipinas, sa inyo muna. Hindi po si dating Pangulong Duterte ang substance ng resolusyon na ito; hindi rin pinag-uusapan dito whether we should rejoin the ICC. Ang pinag-uusapan dito ay simple: pag may biglang aarestuhin, kailangan yung aarestuhin na yon ay may pagkakataon pumunta sa Philippine courts to seek remedy. This is part of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and generally accepted principles of international law.”

Ang hakbang na ito ay bahagi rin ng International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights na kinikilala sa buong mundo.

Nakatakdang ipagpatuloy ang pagtalakay o interpellation sa resolusyong ito sa darating na Lunes, March 2, 2026.

Humiling ang ibang mga senador tulad nina Senator Ping Lacson at Senator Kiko Pangilinan ng pagkakataong makapagtanong tungkol sa nasabing panukala.

Pansamantalang sinuspinde ang konsiderasyon ng resolusyon upang bigyang-daan ang mas malalim na diskusyon sa susunod na session ng Senado.

Aminado si Admiral na walang security escort assigned para kay Imee Marcos

0

Tiniyak ng Presidential Security Group (PSG) na magtatalaga sila ng security contingent para kay Senator Imee Marcos dahil mandato nilang protektahan ang lahat ng mga kapatid ng Pangulo.

Inamin ni Admiral Andro Val Abayon na nadiskubre niyang walang personnel na naka-assign sa senadora nang simulan niya ang kanyang pamumuno noong Nobyembre.

Ang kakulangang ito sa proteksyon ay nakita matapos ang isinagawang pagsusuri sa kasalukuyang close-in protection system ng PSG.

Binigyang-diin ni Admiral Abayon na tungkulin nilang magbigay ng proteksyon anuman ang maging desisyon ng kapatid ng Pangulo.

Ayon kay Senator Ping Lacson, ang pagbabantay sa mga kapatid ng Presidente ay isang basic function at tungkulin na hindi dapat isantabi ng grupo.

Sinabi ni Admiral Abayon na nagsagawa siya ng diagnosis sa buong command upang ayusin ang security plans para sa First Family.

Kinumpirma ng opisyal na habang may security na si Miss Irene Marcos, tanging si Senator Imee ang wala pang nakatalagang tauhan mula sa PSG.

“Your honor, it is mandated for us to protect the siblings, and I will talk to the good senator for the preparation of her security,” ayon kay Admiral Abayon.

Ipinaliwanag ni Senator Lacson na ang kaligtasan ni Senator Imee ay mananatiling pananagutan ng PSG sakaling may mangyaring hindi maganda.

Dahil dito, dapat aniyang magpadala ng contingent ang grupo kahit pa tumanggi ang senadora sa alok na proteksyon.

Narito ang maikling excerpt ng usapan:

Senator Ping Lacson: You know, it’s a basic function, basic tasking, basic duty of the PSG to secure the siblings. It is up to the presidential sister, in this case Senator Marcos, if she needs security or not, because if something happens to her, is your responsibility.

Admiral Andro Val Abayon: Yes, your honor.

Senator Ping Lacson: So how do you intend to go about it now?

Admiral Andro Val Abayon: I will prepare security teams, your honor, for our good senator.

Senator Ping Lacson: So even if she refuses, you will assign a contingent to secure her.

Admiral Andro Val Abayon: That’s the mandate, your honor.

Senator Ping Lacson: Tama. Tama sagot mo. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Tumugon ang pinuno ng PSG na gagawin nila ito dahil ito ang nakasaad sa kanilang mandato bilang mga tagapagtanggol ng pamilya ng Pangulo.

Nagpahayag naman ng katanungan si Senator Jinggoy Estrada kung paano kung hindi ito payagan ng mismong Pangulo.

Mr. Chair, just one question. What if the President does not allow it? What will you do?”

Mukhang hindi malaman ni Admiral ang isasagot, kaya, nagmungkahi na lang si Lacson,

“I’ll post it as an answer, ha: I’ll cross the bridge when I get there.”

I will cross the bridge when I get there,” ang paulit na sagot ni Admiral kay Estrada sa naturang usapin.

Patuloy ang koordinasyon ng grupo upang matiyak na lahat ng kapatid ng Presidente ay may sapat na proteksyon laban sa anumang banta.

18 ex-Marines itinuro si Marcos Jr. na utak sa male-maletang korapsyon

0

Inilantad ng 18 dating Marines ang diumano’y bulto-bultong delivery ng mga maleta ng pera sa mga tirahan ni President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. at ang panunuhol sa mga International Criminal Court (ICC) investigators.

Inihayag ni Atty. Levito Baligod ang mga testimonya nina Bernard Tubera at iba pang dating sundalo tungkol sa mahigit 100 delivery ng cash mula 2022 hanggang 2024.

“Ang mga kasundaluhan na nasa harap ninyo, mula September 2022 hanggang sa gitna ng 2024, ay tatlo hanggang apat na beses kada linggo na nagde-deliver ng pera sa Forbes Park at sa Arlegui sa tapat ng Malacañang. Mahigit 100 beses silang nag-deliver, at kada delivery ay hindi bumababa sa bente na maleta. At minsan umaabot nga ito ng 52 na maleta na kinailangan pa nila ang anim na vans para mai-deliver lamang ang mga maleta na ito.”

Ang mga maleta ay inihatid diumano gamit ang hanggang anim na van bawat pagkakataon. Ayon sa mga whistleblower, ang operasyon ay sa utos nina Speaker Martin Romualdez at Representative Zaldy Co.

Agad namang naglabas ng matinding depensa ang Malacañang at iba pang opisyal sa harap ng mga mabibigat na paratang na ito.

Tinawag ni Usec Claire Castro ang mga alegasyon na isang script at paulit-ulit na kasinungalingan laban sa Pangulo.

Hinamon niya ang media na tignan kung sino ang nagpopondo at sumusundo sa mga whistleblower pagkatapos ng kanilang press briefing.

Iginiit niya na tungkulin ng NBI at PNP na hulihin ang mga nagkakalat ng fake news.

“Paulit-ulit na kasinungalingan laban sa Pangulo. Ang script, hindi pang-award-winning, hindi malinis. Alam mo na may kasinungalingan.”

Nanawagan si Senator Imee Marcos sa mga dating sundalo na humarap sa Senado upang patunayan ang kanilang mga affidavit sa ilalim ng panunumpa.

Sinabi niya na hindi dapat mauwi sa trial by publicity ang mga ganitong seryosong akusasyon na sumisira sa dangal ng Kongreso.

Gusto ng senadora na buksan ang katotohanan sa tamang venue at hindi lamang sa mga press briefing.

“Kung baga sa maleta, mananatiling sikreto ang lamang niyan kung hindi ilalatag sa lamesa at bubuksan. Dito natin buksan sa Senado at suriin ang maleta ng katotohanan.”

Nanindigan si Atty. Baligod na ang Pangulo ang pangunahing responsable sa mga nangyayaring pagnanakaw diumano sa gobyerno.

Sinabi niya na bilang Chief Executive, dapat siyang maging pangunahing tagapagpatupad ng batas ngunit hinayaan lang ang mga ilegal na gawain. Ipinunto niya na takot ang mga kaalyado ng Pangulo na kumilos nang wala itong pahintulot.

“Ang ugat at pinuno ng pagnanakaw sa ating bayan ay walang iba kundi si President Marcos. At hindi gagalaw si Speaker Romualdez o si Zaldy na walang pahintulot kay PBBM. Bakit siya tumanggap ng maletang pera? Hindi ba siya nagtanong saan galing ito o para saan ito? I hold him responsible because, being the Chief Executive and the head of the executive branch, he is the chief implementer of laws. Siya ang dapat mag-implement ng mga batas. Pero hinayaan ang mga ito,” dagdag ni Baligod.

Nadawit din sa tensyon si Vice President Sara Duterte na naglarawan sa kasalukuyang governance bilang kalat at walang maayos na direksyon.

Sinagot ito ng Palasyo sa pamamagitan ng pagbanggit sa mga isyu ng ghost students at ghost vouchers sa DepEd noong siya pa ang kalihim.

Sinabi ni Castro na kasalukuyang nililinis ni Secretary Sonny Angara ang mga naiwang problema ng Bise Presidente.

“Nakikita niyo na parang kalat ‘yung governance ngayon kasi ganoon din ‘yung ibang departments. Buti sana kung magaling lahat ng secretaries. Walang utos, walang nag-uutos sa ‘yo na presidente at walang nagbabantay sa ‘yo na presidente.”

Si General Torre naman ay tumangging magbigay ng komento habang hindi pa napatutunayan ang mga affidavit na may napakaraming pangalan.

Binanggit niya na baka sa huli ay sabihin lamang ng mga whistleblower na biro lang ang kanilang mga pahayag. Sa kabila nito, nananatiling aktibo ang panig ni Baligod sa paglalabas ng mga karagdagang datos sa publiko.

Sa huli, nananatiling mailap ang katotohanan habang wala pang pormal na kasong naisasampa sa korte laban sa mga nasabing opisyal.

Hinihintay ng publiko ang susunod na hakbang ni Atty. Baligod sa Office of the Ombudsman at ang posibleng imbestigasyon sa Senado.

Nicholas Kaufman kinwestyon ang ebidensya sa ICC vs Duterte

Nagsimula na ang pagdinig sa International Criminal Court (ICC) sa The Hague para sa mga kasong crimes against humanity laban kay dating Pangulong Rodrigo Duterte kaugnay ng kanyang madugong war on drugs.

Iprinisinta ng prosecution ang mga ebidensya tungkol sa umano’y pag-organisa at pag-pondo ni Duterte sa mga hitmen noong siya ay mayor pa ng Davao City at hanggang sa kanyang pagkapangulo.

Nahaharap ang 80-anyos na dating lider sa tatlong counts ng murder at attempted murder para sa mga insidenteng naganap sa pagitan ng Nobyembre 2011 at Marso 2019.

Bagama’t nasa kustodiya na ng ICC simula noong Marso 12, 2025, hindi dumalo si Duterte sa simula ng pagdinig matapos niyang talikuran ang kanyang karapatang humarap sa korte.

Layunin ng confirmation of charges hearing na ito na tukuyin kung may sapat na basehan para ituloy ang kaso sa trial stage.

Inaasahang maglalabas ng desisyon ang mga huwes sa loob ng 60 araw matapos ang nakatakdang limang araw na pagdinig.

Sa panig ng defense, binira ni Lead Counsel Nicholas Kaufman ang prosecution at tinawag na politically motivated ang mga paratang upang pabagsakin ang legacy ni Duterte.

Binanggit niya ang sulat ni Pangulong Ferdinand Marcos Jr. kung saan nangako ang gobyerno na hindi makikialam sa ICC.

Ayon sa defense, may mga lihim na hakbang ang kasalukuyang administrasyon gaya ng funneling ng mga witnesses para pahinain ang posisyon ni Duterte sa internasyonal na komunidad.

“Will not assist the ICC in any way, shape, or form.”

Binigyang-diin ng defense na mas marami silang nakitang talumpati ni Duterte na nag-uutos sa mga pulis na sumunod sa batas kaysa sa mga ginagamit ng prosecution para sa incitement.

Mayroon umanong 45 speeches na pabor sa lawful self-defense kumpara sa sampu lamang na ginagamit para patunayan ang intensyong pumatay.

Pinabulaanan din nila ang pagkakaroon ng Davao Death Squad at tinawag itong isang fictitious construct na gawa-gawa lamang ng mga kritiko at media.

“The notorious speeches on which the prosecution relies have been cherry-picked to suit its narrative while ignoring the many other speeches when the former president tempered his bombastic language by clear reference to the principle of lawful self-defense.”

Kinuwestiyon din ng defense ang kredibilidad ng imbestigasyon dahil sa dating Chief Prosecutor na si Karim Khan na na-disqualify sa kaso dahil sa conflict of interest.

Binatikos nila ang paggamit ng aklat na Duterte Harry bilang ebidensya at tinawag itong trashy item of pulp fiction na walang objectivity.

Bilang patunay ng kawalan ng criminal intent, binanggit ni Kaufman ang bahagi ng Pieta speech kung saan binalaan ni Duterte ang mga abusadong pulis.

“Abuse your authority and there will be hell to pay, for you will have become worse than criminality itself.”

Sa pagtatapos ng unang bahagi ng mga pahayag, hiniling ng defense team na ibasura ang lahat ng kaso laban kay Duterte at ibalik siya sa kanyang pamilya bilang kanilang Tatay Digong.

Binigyang-diin nila na walang sapat na basehan para sabihing ninais ng dating pangulo na pumatay ng mga tao dahil lamang sa kanyang incendiary language.

Mananatili ang atensyon ng mundo sa ICC habang sinusuri ang mga ebidensya bago ang pinal na desisyon ng korte sa loob ng susunod na dalawang buwan.

ICC hearing laban kay Duterte sa The Hague, simula na

0

Nagsimula na ang makasaysayang confirmation of charges hearing laban kay dating Pangulong Rodrigo Duterte sa International Criminal Court (ICC) sa The Hague.

Pormal nang binasa ang mga kasong murder bilang crimes against humanity na naganap umano sa Davao City at buong Pilipinas mula 2011 hanggang 2019.

Hindi sumipot si Duterte sa pagdinig matapos payagan ng korte ang kanyang request na i-waive ang karapatang dumalo. Gayunpaman, naroon ang kanyang mga abogado para irepresenta ang kanyang panig sa harap ng mga judge.

Binigyang-diin ni Judge Julia Antoanella Motoc na ang layunin ng pagdinig ay tukuyin kung may sapat na ebidensya para sa isang full trial.

Tiniyak ng korte na ituturing na inosente ang akusado hangga’t hindi napatutunayan ang sala sa ilalim ng Rome Statute.

Ang prosekusyon ang may tungkuling maglatag ng matibay na basehan para makumbinsi ang Pre-Trial Chamber.

Inaasahang tatagal ang prosesong ito upang masuri ang lahat ng aspeto ng mga alegasyon laban sa dating lider.

Inilahad ni Deputy Prosecutor Mame Mandiaye Niang ang tatlong counts ng murder at attempted murder na kinasasangkutan ng libu-libong biktima.

Kasama rito ang mga pagpatay sa Davao City sa ilalim ng Davao Death Squad (DDS) at ang pambansang operasyong Double Barrel.

Ayon sa Office of the Prosecutor, si Duterte ang nagdisenyo at nagpatupad ng polisiya laban sa mga drug suspects.

Ginamit umano niya ang kanyang awtoridad bilang Mayor at Pangulo para magbigay ng pondo at proteksyon sa mga pumatay.

Ipinakita ng prosekusyon ang mga ebidensyang nagpapatunay na kontrolado ni Duterte ang bawat galaw ng mga operatiba.

Sinabi ni Niang na ang mga utos ng dating Pangulo ay sinusunod dahil sa takot o katapatan ng kanyang mga tauhan.

Binanggit din ang kanyang mga pampublikong pahayag na nag-uudyok sa pagpatay kapalit ng reward o promotion.

Isang mahalagang bahagi ng ebidensya ang mga naging salita mismo ni Duterte noong siya ay nasa posisyon pa.

“In Davao, I used to do it personally just to show the guys that if I can do it, why can’t you?”

Nagpahayag naman ng matinding pagkadismaya ang mga legal representatives ng mga biktima sa hindi pagharap ni Duterte.

Ayon sa isang legal representative ng mga biktima, ang ICC na lamang ang huling pintuan para makamit ang hustisya ng mga pamilyang naulila.

Binanggit niya ang hirap ng paghahanap ng katarungan sa loob ng Pilipinas dahil sa takot at impluwensya ng mga kaalyado ng dating Pangulo.

Ang mga biktima ay patuloy umanong nakararanas ng harassment mula sa mga tagasunod ng kampo ni Duterte.

“The sight of Mr. Duterte being read and being confronted with the grave and horrible charges against him would have constituted a vital component of justice for the victims.”

Nakaasa ngayon ang kapalaran ng kaso sa mga isinumiteng dokumento, forensic evidence, at mga testimonya ng mga insider witnesses.

Sinusuri ng ICC ang mga drug watchlists at official reports mula sa Philippine National Police na ginamit sa operasyon.

Layunin ng prosekusyon na patunayan na ang mga krimen ay bahagi ng isang widespread at systematic attack laban sa mga sibilyan.

Ang bawat piraso ng ebidensya ay mahalaga upang maituloy ang kaso sa Trial Chamber sa hinaharap.

Ang desisyon ng korte sa mga susunod na araw ang magtatakda kung magkakaroon ng pormal na paglilitis laban sa dating Pangulo.

Patuloy na susubaybayan ng buong mundo at ng mga Pilipino ang bawat detalye ng pagdinig na ito sa The Hague.

Tinitiyak ng mga judge na magiging patas ang proseso para sa parehong panig sa ilalim ng international law.

Mananatiling bukas ang sesyon para sa mga susunod na presentasyon ng mahahalagang ebidensya at argumento mula sa magkabilang panig.

VIP fugitives nakakatakas sa BI gamit ang tarmac airport at backdoor exits

0

Binanggit nina Senator Raffy Tulfo at Senator Win Gatchalian ang pagtakas ng ilang VIP fugitives gamit ang airport tarmac at ibang backdoor exits – gaya nina Alice Guo, Harry Roque, at iba pang pugante.

Sa Senado, inalmahan ni Senador Raffy Tulfo ang patuloy na ginagamit na butas sa airports para makatakas ang mga fugitive at makapasok ng kontrabando sa bansa sa pamamagitan ng chartered flights at VIP processing.

Sa naganap na Senate hearing tungkol sa modernization ng Bureau of Immigration (BI), ibinunyag ni Tulfo na ilang beses nang nagamit ang scheme na ito sa human trafficking at smuggling dahil hindi dumadaan sa regular na proseso ng immigration ang mga VIP passengers na sakay ng chartered planes.

Ayon sa senador, direktang pinapapasok sa tarmac ang sasakyan ng mga pasahero, sasakay ng eroplano, at doon pa lang sila poprocesshin ng immigration at customs gamit ang cellphone na walang koneksyon sa main database ng BI.

“Kung malakas sila at may konting meku-mekus, pwede silang makalusot using false ID at irerehistro lang sa manifest bilang Juan Dela Cruz kahit Mario Santos pala ang pangalan,” paliwanag ni Tulfo.

Binigyang-diin din nito na hindi ini-inspect ang mga bagahe ng mga pasahero sa chartered flights, kaya posibleng magpasok ng droga, baril, at iba pang kontrabando nang hindi nahuhuli.

Umamin si BI Commissioner Joel Anthony Viado na sa ngayon ay wala pang VIP processing center para sa chartered passengers dahil may private entity na nag-ooperate ng airports, ngunit suportado nila ang paggawa nito.

“We acknowledge that your honor, we will address the matter immediately with those concerned from the private entity operating the airports,” sagot ni Viado sa senador.

Lumalabas din sa hearing na malawakang ginagamit ang backdoor exits sa Tawi-Tawi para makatakas ang mga high-profile personalities gaya nina Guo Hua Ping o Alice Guo, Harry Roque, Congressman Teves, at Atong Ang.

Ayon kay Viado, halos 50 percent ng karagatan ng bansa na sakop ng Tawi-Tawi ay mahina ang internet connection doon, kaya hirap silang magmonitor at mag-validate ng mga dumadaang tao.

Nabunyag din na 150 hanggang 160 lang ang intelligence personnel ng BI nationwide, at lima lang ang operatiba ng Fugitive Search Unit na humuhuli ng mga fugitive.

Wala ring facial recognition technology ang BI kaya kahit blacklist at pinalayas na ang isang dayuhan, makakabalik ito gamit lang ibang passport na pareho ang litrato ayon kay Viado.

Hinimok ni Tulfo na bilisan ang modernization program ng BI at bigyan ng sapat na budget para magkaroon ng facial recognition, additional personnel, at sariling sea assets para makasampa sa mga dredging vessels na ginagamit sa posibleng human smuggling.

Magdadala ng pag-ulan sa bansa ang Shearline at Amihan (February 22, 2026)

0

Mananatiling bagyo-free ang bansa ngayong araw ngunit asahan ang mga pag-ulan sa malaking bahagi ng Luzon, Visayas, at Mindanao dahil sa epekto ng shear line at Northeast Monsoon o Amihan.

Ngayong Linggo, February 22, 2026, walang mino-monitor na Low Pressure Area (LPA) o bagyo sa loob at labas ng Philippine Area of Responsibility.

Gayunpaman, ang shear line o ang salubungan ng malamig at mainit na hangin ang nagdadala ng kaulapan sa silangang bahagi ng Visayas.

Samantala, ang Northeast Monsoon o Amihan ang nakakaapekto sa Luzon, habang Easterlies naman ang umiiral sa Mindanao.

Sa Metro Manila at nalalabing bahagi ng Luzon, asahan ang fair weather condition na may tsansa ng mahihinang pag-ulan. Ang mga lalawigan naman ng Cagayan, Isabela, at Aurora ay makakaranas ng maulap na papawirin dahil sa hanging Amihan.

Sa kabisayaan at hilagang bahagi ng Mindanao, asahan ang kalat-kalat na pag-ulan at pagkulog-pagkidlat dahil sa shear line.

Lagay ng Panahon sa Luzon, Visayas, at Mindanao

Sa susunod na mga araw, inaasahang hihina ang epekto ng Amihan sa Luzon at magdudulot na lamang ng isolated light rains sa extreme Northern Luzon.

Magkakaroon naman ng mga localized thunderstorms sa Metro Manila at iba pang bahagi ng Luzon simula bukas hanggang Huwebes.

Ang Easterlies naman ay posibleng magdala ng mga pag-ulan sa Eastern at Central Visayas, Caraga, at Northern Mindanao sa mga darating na araw.

Nagbabala ang PAGASA sa mga residente sa Eastern Visayas, Central Visayas, Dinagat Islands, Surigao del Norte, Camiguin, at Misamis Oriental. Pinapayuhan ang publiko na maging mapagmatyag sa panganib na dulot ng panahon.

“Ating mga kababayan, lalo na ang mga inuulan nitong mga nakaraang araw pa, ay pinag-iingat sa mga bantang pagbaha o pagguhon ng lupa.”

Temperatura at Astronomical Data

Narito ang agwat ng temperatura sa iba’t ibang bahagi ng bansa ngayong araw:

LugarTemperatura (°C)
Metro Manila22 to 30°C
Baguio14 to 24°C
Tagaytay21 to 29°C
Laoag21 to 33°C
Tuguegarao24 to 31°C
Legazpi24 to 30°C
Puerto Princesa25 to 31°C
Cebu25 to 31°C
Iloilo26 to 31°C
Tacloban / Cagayan de Oro24 to 30°C
Zamboanga / Davao24/25 to 33°C

Ayon sa PAGASA, wala ring nakataas na gale warning sa alinmang baybayin ng bansa kaya ligtas ang paglalayag. Ang araw ay sumikat kaninang 6:17 ng umaga at inaasahang lulubog mamayang 6:02 ng hapon.

Sa kabuuan, bagamat walang bagyo, nananatiling banta ang pagbaha at landslides sa Visayas at Mindanao dahil sa shear line. Inaasahan ding unti-unting hihina ang hanging Amihan sa Luzon sa mga susunod na araw.

Shearline at amihan magdadala ng ulan (February 21, 2026)

0

Patuloy na makararanas ng pag-ulan ang malaking bahagi ng Visayas at Mindanao dahil sa shear line, habang nananatili namang malamig ang panahon sa Luzon dulot ng amihan,.

Kasalukuyang nakakaapekto ang shear line sa silangang bahagi ng bansa na nagdadala ng mga serye ng thunderstorms,. Ayon sa huling ulat, wala tayong binabantayang low pressure area (LPA) o bagyo sa loob ng Philippine Area of Responsibility.

Ang Northeast Monsoon o amihan ay nagdudulot pa rin ng mahihinang pag-ulan at cooler temperature sa Northern at Central Luzon. Asahan naman ang bahagyang maulap na papawirin sa Metro Manila na may tsansa ng pulo-pulong pag-ulan sa buong araw.

Banta ng Pagbaha sa Visayas at Mindanao

Ang shear line, o ang boundary kung saan nagtatagpo ang malamig na northeasterly at mainit na easterly winds, ay nagdadala ng mataas na tsansa ng ulan.

Apektado nito ang Eastern at Central Visayas, Caraga, Davao Region, Northern Mindanao, at bahagi ng SOCSKSARGEN. Nagbabala ang PAGASA sa posibleng pagbaha at landslides dahil sa tuloy-tuloy na pag-ulan,.

Ayon kay Loriedin Dela Cruz-Galicia:

“Ang possible na effect pa rin po nito ay ‘yung mga, ah, pagbaha po or mga localized flooding. Kaya pinag-iingat pa rin po natin sila, lalong-lalo na po sa ilang araw na pong mga lugar na kung saan ay ilang araw na po silang nakakaranas ng mga pag-ulan.”

Weather Advisory at Rainfall Forecast

May nakataas na weather advisory na 50 hanggang 100 mm na dami ng ulan sa Eastern Samar, Dinagat Islands, at mga lalawigan ng Surigao at Agusan.

Inaasahang magpapatuloy ang ganitong kondisyon hanggang bukas sa ilang bahagi ng Eastern Visayas at Northeastern Mindanao. Pinapayuhan ang mga residente na maging alerto at mag-extra precaution.

AreaTemperature Range (°C)
Metro Manila22 – 30
Baguio City14 – 24
Tagaytay City21 – 28
Zamboanga City25 – 33
Davao City25 – 30
Laoag City22 – 33

Lagay ng Panahon sa Luzon at Karagatan

Dahil sa amihan, makararanas ng maulap na papawirin na may mahihinang pag-ulan ang Cagayan Valley, Apayao, Kalinga, Mountain Province, Ifugao, Aurora, at Quezon.

Sa ibang bahagi ng Luzon at Metro Manila, asahan ang bahagyang maulap na panahon. Ang mga easterlies naman ay umiiral sa katimugang bahagi ng Mindanao.

Walang nakataas na gale warning sa anumang baybayin ng bansa sa kasalukuyan. Gayunpaman, katamtaman hanggang sa maalon ang dagat sa eastern sections ng Visayas, Southern Luzon, at Mindanao. Pinag-iingat ang mga mangingisda at mga gumagamit ng maliliit na sasakyang pandagat.

Summary

Mananatiling maulan sa silangang bahagi ng Visayas at Mindanao dahil sa shear line, habang ang Luzon ay makararanas ng malamig na temperatura mula sa amihan.

Pinapaalalahanan ang publiko na maging handa sa banta ng pagbaha at landslides lalo na sa mga lugar na may weather advisory,. Ang sunrise ngayong araw ay 6:01 ng umaga at lulubog ang araw mamayang 6:02 ng gabi.

Uulanin ang malaking bahagi ng Visayas at Mindanao (February 20, 2026 5AM)

0

Patuloy na uulanin ang malaking bahagi ng Mindanao at Eastern Visayas ngayong Biyernes dahil sa epekto ng shear line habang umiiral naman ang amihan sa Luzon.

Walang binabantayang bagyo o Low Pressure Area (LPA) sa loob at labas ng Philippine Area of Responsibility ngayong February 20, 2026.

Inaasahan ang tatlong araw na pag-ulan sa Mindanao at silangang bahagi ng Visayas dulot ng shear line o ang salubungan ng hanging amihan at easterlies.

Nakataas ang weather advisory para sa malawakang pagbaha at pagguho ng lupa sa Davao Oriental at Surigao del Sur.

Maingat ding binabantayan ang posibleng localized flooding sa Agusan del Sur, Agusan del Norte, at Dinagat Islands.

Ulat Panahon sa Luzon at Visayas

Ang amihan ay nagdadala ng maulap na panahon at mahihinang pag-ulan sa Cagayan Valley, Aurora, Quezon, Bicol, at Cordillera Administrative Region.

Generally fair weather naman ang asahan sa Metro Manila, Laoag, at Mimaropa. Sa Visayas, mararanasan ang malalakas na ulan sa Cebu, Bohol, at buong Eastern Visayas.

“Kailangan mag-doble ingat at makipag-ugnayan sa ating mga local government units kung sakaling kailangan nang mag-evacuate sa inyong mga lugar.”

Forecast na Temperatura at Karagatan

Mababa ang temperatura sa mga lugar na apektado ng ulan, partikular na sa Baguio at silangang Mindanao.

CityTemperature Range
Baguio14 to 24°C
Metro Manila22 to 31°C
Tacloban24 to 29°C
Davao24 to 27°C
Zamboanga25 to 33°C

Wala namang nakataas na gale warning kaya malayang makapaglalayag ang mga kababayan sa ating mga karagatan. Inaasahang aakyat ang axis ng shear line patungong Eastern Visayas at Southern Leyte sa mga susunod na araw.

Summary

Mananatiling maulan ang silangang bahagi ng bansa habang ang kanlurang Luzon ay makakaranas ng maaliwalas na panahon.

Pinapayuhan ang mga residente sa Mindanao na maging alerto sa landslides at localized flooding dahil sa naipong ulan.

Claire Castro pinuri si Leni Robredo binagsak si Sara Duterte

0

Mas uminit ang usaping pulitika sa bansa matapos ideklara ni Vice President Sara Duterte ang kanyang pagtakbo sa pagka-Pangulo para sa 2028 elections, habang lumalabas naman ang pangalan ni Naga City Mayor Leni Robredo bilang posibleng katunggali.

Noong Miyerkules, Pebrero 18, pormal na inanunsyo ni Duterte ang kanyang intensyon sa gitna ng mga kinakaharap na impeachment cases.

Humingi rin siya ng paumanhin sa taumbayan sa pakikipag-alyansa kay Pangulong Ferdinand Marcos Jr. noong 2025, na kanyang pinagsisisihan.

Tinawag naman ng Malacañang na “irrelevant” ang maagang anunsyong ito dahil nakatutok ang administrasyon sa pagpapaunlad ng buhay ng mga Pilipino.

Ayon kay Palace Press Officer Claire Castro, mas mahalaga ang pagkakaisa kaysa sa pulitika sa ngayon.

”Ang mga kababayan po natin, lalong-lalo na po ‘yung mga leaders, mga public servants, hindi po dapat nagkakampihan sa ngayon.”

Naniniwala ang ilang political analysts na si Robredo ang pinakamalakas na kalaban ni Duterte sa susunod na presidential race.

Sa kabila ng pag-balewala ng Palasyo, nakatakdang magkita sina Pangulong Marcos at Mayor Robredo sa Naga City ngayong Sabado, Pebrero 21.

Ang kanilang pagpupulong ay para sa implementasyon ng Oplan Kontra Baha sa Sagop Creek.

Binigyang-diin ng Palasyo na trabaho at hindi pangangampanya ang prayoridad ng Pangulo sa kasalukuyan.

Ipinaliwanag ni Undersecretary Claire Castro ang pananaw ng Malacañang tungkol sa usaping ito.

“Ang ganyan pong pananaw, hindi po ito ang pananaw ng Palasyo. Irrelevant po ang pagdedeklara ng Bise Presidente na siya ay tatakbo bilang Pangulo. Bakit irrelevant? Hindi po iyan ang nakikita ng Pangulo sa ngayon dahil hindi po kinakailangang magwatak-watak ang mga Pilipino.”

Dagdag pa niya, hindi pa napapanahon ang usapin ng pagpanig o pag-endorso sa kahit sinong kandidato.

“Ang kailangan po ng Pangulo ay ang pagkakaisa upang maiangat ang ekonomiya, masolusyunan ang issue sa baha, at maiangat ang employment rate ng ating mga Pilipino,”.

Nagbigay din ng reaksyon ang Palasyo sa obserbasyon ni Professor Antonio Contreras tungkol sa tapatang Robredo at Duterte.

Inilarawan ito sa mga kategoryang “aksyon versus bakasyon” at “working versus hindi nagtatrabaho”.

“Suhestyon na igagalang, patawad pero hindi napapanahon,”.

Bagaman iginagalang ang mga opinyong ito, hindi pa umano ito ang focus ng administrasyon.

Binabantayan na ngayon ng publiko kung magkakaroon ng bagong alyansa sa pagitan nina Marcos at Robredo.

Sa huli, nananatiling mailap ang Malacañang sa direktang pagsuporta kay Robredo kahit pa may nakatakdang pulong ang dalawang dating magkatunggali.

Ang maagang deklarasyon ni Duterte ay nagpaliyab sa diskurso para sa 2028 sa gitna ng kanyang mga legal na hamon.

Patuloy namang binibigyang-diin ng gobyerno na ang tunay na sukatan ng liderato ay ang resulta ng pagtatrabaho para sa bayan.

Nananatiling bukas ang pinto sa mga usaping politikal habang papalapit ang susunod na halalan.

Warrant of arrest at paghuli kay Bato dela Rosa at Bong Go hindi pipigilan ng palasyo

0

Nakatakdang pag-usapan ng Senado ang posibleng pag-aresto kina Senator Bato dela Rosa at Senator Bong Go matapos silang pangalanan ng International Criminal Court (ICC) bilang mga co-perpetrators sa drug war ni dating Pangulong Rodrigo Duterte.

Kasama ang dalawang senador sa walong opisyal na idiniin ng ICC Office of the Prosecutor sa mga kasong crimes against humanity.

Ayon sa mga dokumento, nagkaroon diumano ng common plan para pumatay ng mga pinaghihinalaang kriminal mula 2011 hanggang 2019.

Ang Malacañang naman ay nanindigang kailangang sumunod sa legal process at makipagtulungan sa Interpol para sa implementasyon ng anumang arrest warrant.

Inihayag ni Communications Undersecretary Claire Castro na obligasyon ng bansa na ipatupad ang mga warrant kahit nag-withdraw na ang Pilipinas sa Rome Statute.

Sinabi rin niya na ang pagsuko sa mga akusado ay isang choice ng administrasyon para masiguradong hindi mapupulitika ang paglilitis.

Binigyang-diin ng Palasyo na ang ICC ay isang neutral venue kaya mas mapagkakatiwalaan ng publiko ang magiging desisyon ng mga hukom.

Kasalukuyang naghihintay ang gobyerno ng opisyal na kopya ng mga warrant of arrest bago gumawa ng susunod na aksyon.

Dahil sa mga development na ito, naghain ang Senate Minority Bloc ng Resolution No. 307 para unahin ang mga local judicial remedies at protektahan ang mga miyembro nito laban sa extraordinary rendition.

Iginiit nina Minority Leader Alan Peter Cayetano na ang pag-aresto ng ICC ay direktang paglabag sa soberanya at constitutional framework ng Pilipinas.

Ayon sa grupo, dapat igalang ang presumption of innocence at bigyan ng sapat na pagkakataon ang mga akusado na dumaan sa lokal na sistema ng hustisya.

“If the interpretation is that when there is an arrest order from the ICC or any international court, we will immediately pick them up and take them to another country, it is very dangerous.”

Pinayuhan naman ng Palasyo ang mga pinangalanang opisyal na huwag magtago at harapin nang matapang ang mga paratang sa ICC.

Ayon kay Usec. Castro, ang pag-iwas sa warrant ay maaaring tingnan bilang pagtakas sa pananagutan sa batas.

Naniniwala ang gobyerno na kung talagang walang kasalanan ang mga opisyal ay mapapatunayan nila ito sa pamamagitan ng acquittal sa tamang proseso.

“They do not need to go into hiding if they know they are innocent. They should face the matter and be courageous in going through the necessary processes.”

Itinanggi naman ni Senator Bong Go ang mga alegasyon at tinawag itong unfounded at one-sided.

Si Senator Bato dela Rosa ay matagal na ring hindi nakikita sa mga sesyon ng Senado mula pa noong Nobyembre 2025.

Bukod sa dalawa, damay din sa listahan nina Duterte sina dating Justice Secretary Vitaliano Aguirre II at ilang dating matataas na opisyal ng PNP at NBI.

Tatalakayin naman ng Senate Majority Bloc ang kanilang magiging hakbang kung sakaling dumating na ang mga warrant mula sa ibang bansa.

May mainit ding usapin kung pananatilihin ang tradisyon ng Senado na bawal arestuhin ang mga miyembro nito habang in-session ang Kongreso.

Sa ngayon, nananatiling matibay ang posisyon ng administrasyong Marcos sa pakikipag-ugnayan sa Interpol para sa ikalulutas ng mga kaso.

Nakatakda ang confirmation of charges hearing ni dating Pangulong Duterte sa darating na Pebrero 23, 2026.

Marcos makikipagkita kay Robredo sa Naga matapos magdeklara ni Sara Duterte

0

Makikipagkita si Pangulong Ferdinand Marcos Jr. kay Naga City Mayor Leni Robredo para sa flood control project sa Bicol.

Nakatakdang magkita ang dalawang lider sa Sabado, February 21, sa Naga City. Layunin ng pagbisita na personal na tingnan ang “Oplan Kontra Baha” na ginagawa ng Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH).

Si Robredo ang kasalukuyang alkalde ng Naga City at kauna-unahang babaeng humawak ng posisyong ito. Siya ang tatanggap sa Pangulo. Ang proyekto ay nakatuon sa paglilinis ng mga kanal, estero, at mga ilog sa buong lungsod.

Ito ang unang pagkakataon na magsasama ang dating magkalaban sa pagkapangulo para sa isang opisyal na aktibidad ng gobyerno.

Ayon kay PCO Usec. Claire Castro, abala na ang mga kawani ng gobyerno sa paghahanda para sa pagbisita.

Kahit nakatuon sa imprastraktura ang aktibidad, may mga nagsasabi na maaaring may kaugnayan ito sa pulitika para sa 2028.

Maraming analysts ang nagsasabi na maaaring maging kandidato si Robredo laban kay Vice President Sara Duterte sa susunod na eleksyon.

Nilinaw naman ng Malacañang na walang kinalaman sa maagang pangangampanya ang nakatakdang pagtatagpo.

Ang pagsusuot din ng kulay pink ng mga opisyal sa press briefing ay itinuring na walang malisya at walang kaugnayan sa anumang alyansa.

Binigyang-diin ng Palasyo na “trabaho, trabaho, trabaho” ang prayoridad ng administrasyon sa kasalukuyan.

“Ang kulay na sinuot ko ngayon ay wala pong kaugnayan sa anumang politika,” paliwanag ni Castro.

“Wala po kasing talagang napag-uusapan tungkol sa pangangampanya o kung sinuman ang magiging kandidato sa 2028,” dagdag pa ng opisyal.

Tungkol naman sa International Criminal Court (ICC), kinumpirma ng Palasyo na legal ang pagpopondo sa biyahe ni dating Pangulong Rodrigo Duterte.

Nakabatay ito sa Section 17 ng Republic Act 9851 na nagpapahintulot sa gobyerno na i-dispense ang lokal na imbestigasyon kung may international tribunal na tumatalakay sa kaso.

Mayroon ding “residual obligation” ang Pilipinas sa Rome Statute para sa mga kaganapang nangyari noong miyembro pa ang bansa.

“Kung taxpayer po ang ginamit dito, ito lang po ay naaayon sa batas dahil gumaganap lang po ang gobyernong ito sa kaniyang katungkulan,” giit ni Castro.

Daang ektaryang lupain sa CamSur binakuran, karagatan sakop ng titulo

0

Umani ng matinding kontrobersya ang umano’y land grabbing at iligal na fencing sa mahigit 300 ektaryang lupain sa Siruma, Camarines Sur na kinasasangkutan ng kumpanyang iniuugnay kay Governor LRay Villafuerte.

Nagsimula ang tensyon noong January 28, 2026, nang harangin ng mga nakamaskarang lalaki ang mga lupain sa Barangay San Ramon at Salvacion nang walang kaukulang permit o konsultasyon sa lokal na pamahalaan.

Ang Wonderlast Land Development Corporation ay sinasabing umaangkin sa 1,149.2 ektaryang sakop ng Transfer Certificate Title (TCT) No. 080-2024001425.

Ayon kay Congressman Arnie Fuentebella, sakop ng bakod ang mga protected timberlands, agrarian reform lands na may CLOA, mga pribadong ari-arian, at pati na ang bahagi ng Pacific Ocean.

“Saan po kayo nakakita na kasama sa titulo ang karagatan?”

Dagdag pa ni Fuentebella, ang operasyon ay ginagawa 24/7 ng mga trabahador na tumatangging magpakilala sa mga residente at opisyal.

Nanawagan na si Mayor Karen Polinga ng tulong sa National Government habang hinihintay ang pagpapatupad ng cease and desist order laban sa nasabing aktibidad.

Kinumpirma naman ni Governor Villafuerte ang pagpapabakod ngunit mariing itinanggi ang paratang na land grabbing.

Binigyang-diin ni Randall Dagooc ang posibleng conflict of interest dahil ang gobernador ang nag-uumpisa ng imbestigasyon sa mga lupain na inaangkin ng sarili niyang korporasyon.

Inirereklamo rin ng mga residente ang umano’y harassment matapos silang padalhan ng administrative notice ng provincial treasurer na may kasamang mga pulis.

Ayon sa mga ulat, bigong umaksyon nang mabilis ang lokal na PNP sa ilalim ni Captain Jerome Despig sa gitna ng takot ng mga mamamayan.

Sa gitna ng sigalot sa Siruma, tatlong opisyal ng DepEd Davao del Norte ang sinuspinde nitong February 16, 2026, dahil sa mga kuwestiyonableng school buildings.

Ang mga nasabing proyekto ay bahagi ng Last Mile School Program na naglalayong magtayo ng mga pasilidad sa mga pinakamalalayong lugar.

Kasalukuyan nang isinusulong ang isang congressional inquiry sa House Committee on Good Government and Public Accountability upang masiyasat ang pagkaka-isyu ng mga titulo sa Siruma.

Layunin ng hakbang na ito na matiyak ang pananagutan ng mga opisyal at maprotektahan ang karapatan ng mga magsasaka at mangingisda sa rehiyon.

“Patawad kung tinulungan kong mahalal si BBM bilang pangulo.” -VPSD

0

Opisyal nang inanunsyo ni Vice President Sara Duterte ang kanyang pagtakbo bilang pangulo sa 2028 national elections sa gitna ng mainit na usapin ng impeachment at pagkalas sa alyansang Uniteam.

Sa isang press conference noong February 18, 2026, tahasang humingi ng paumanhin ang bise presidente sa publiko sa pagtulong kay President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. na manalo noong nakaraang halalan.

Binatikos ni Duterte ang administrasyong Marcos dahil sa umano’y kawalan ng integridad at pagkabigo sa mga campaign promises gaya ng pagsugpo sa baha at pagkontrol sa presyo ng mga bilihin.

Iginiit niya na hindi na niya kayang manatili sa Gabinete dahil sa 2025 national budget na tila nababalot ng corruption.

“I am Sara Duterte, and I will run for president of the Philippines,”

“Patawad kung tinulungan kong mahalal si BBM bilang pangulo ng ating bansa,”

Ang deklarasyong ito ay kasunod ng pagkaka-file ng apat na impeachment complaints laban sa bise presidente sa House of Representatives.

Pangunahing isyu rito ang umano’y maling paggamit ng P612.5 million na confidential funds noong siya ay nasa Office of the Vice President at Department of Education.

Bukod sa sariling mga kaso, kasalukuyan ding nakadetine sa The Hague ang kanyang amang si dating President Rodrigo Duterte para sa paglilitis sa International Criminal Court (ICC) kaugnay ng war on drugs.

May isa ring reklamo na nag-uugnay sa bise presidente sa extrajudicial killings sa Davao City noong siya ay alkalde pa.

Bago ang kanyang talumpati, ipinaalis ni Duterte ang logo ng Office of the Vice President sa kanyang podium bilang simbolo ng pormal na pakikipaghiwalay sa administrasyon.

Ayon sa mga political analysts, ang timing ng anunsyo ay isang strategic power move upang ilihis ang usapin mula sa impeachment patungo sa 2028 race.

“I offer my life, my strength, and my future in the service of our nation,”

Suportado nina Senator Bong Go at Senator Robin Padilla ang desisyon, kung saan lumutang pa ang ideya ng isang “girl power” tandem nina Duterte at Senator Imee Marcos.

Subalit binatikos ng Makabayan bloc ang hakbang na ito bilang isang “distraction” sa mga kinakaharap niyang alegasyon ng katiwalian.

Sa kabuuan, ang maagang deklarasyon ni Sara Duterte ay hudyat ng mas matinding tunggalian sa pulitika ng Pilipinas bago ang susunod na presidential election.

Nanatili siyang matatag sa pagsasabing ang kanyang kandidatura ay para sa seguridad at kinabukasan ng susunod na henerasyon ng mga Pilipino.

“Good Luck”: Palace Reacts to Sara Duterte’s 2028 Run

0

Vice President Sara Duterte has declared her intention to run in the 2028 presidential elections, drawing a brief “Good luck” from Malacañang.

Palace officials said President Bongbong Marcos Jr. smiled when he made the remark but did not clarify whether it was sincere or sarcastic.

Usec Claire Castro responded to Duterte’s apology for helping Marcos win in 2022, stressing that “ang taong bayan ang naghalal” and that she should not claim sole credit for the Uniteam victory.

In addressing Duterte’s criticism over flooding, officials cited 13,917 flood control projects under former President Rodrigo Duterte and recalled past disasters including Ompong, Tisoy, Ambo, Rolly, and Ulysses, as well as major flooding in Davao City in 2021 without a typhoon.

The Palace also raised issues involving confidential funds of the OVP and DepEd, alleged fake student vouchers worth ₱200 million, spoiled food deliveries, and missing school materials, saying any impeachment complaints would stem from her own actions.

Also, Malacañang said no alliance talks for 2028 are underway and emphasized that the President remains focused on governance while leaving voters to assess the candidates.

Discaya Links Lawmakers to Flood Funds

0

MANILA, Philippines — Contractors Pacifico Discaya and Sara Rowena Discaya have accused several lawmakers and officials of the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) of participating in an alleged kickback scheme involving government flood control projects.

Testifying before the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee, the Discaya couple claimed that construction firms were required to give up to 25 percent of project funds to certain members of Congress and DPWH officials in exchange for the approval and release of contracts.

According to the couple, the payments were made in cash and recorded only in private ledgers, without official receipts. They described the arrangement as a “normal system” within DPWH contracting processes.

Among those named during the hearing were House Speaker Martin Romualdez and Representative Zaldy Co, along with several other current and former lawmakers:

  • Roman Romulo (Pasig Lone District)
  • James “Jojo” Ang (Uswag Ilonggo Partylist)
  • Patrick Michael Vargas (Quezon City 5th District)
  • Juan Carlos “Arjo” Atayde (Quezon City 1st District)
  • Nicanor Briones (Agap Partylist)
  • Marcelino “Marcy” Teodoro (Marikina 1st District)
  • Florida “Rida” Robes (former representative, now mayor of San Jose del Monte, Bulacan)
  • Eleandro Jesus Madrona (Romblon Lone District)
  • Benjamin “Benjie” Agarao Jr. (Laguna 4th District)
  • Florencio Gabriel “Bem” Noel (former An-Waray Partylist representative)
  • Leody “Odie” Tarriela (Occidental Mindoro Lone District)
  • Reynante Arrogancia (Quezon 3rd District)
  • Marvin Rillo (Quezon City 4th District)
  • Teodorico “Teodoro” Haresco Jr. (former Aklan 2nd District representative)
  • Antonieta Eudela (former Zamboanga Sibugay 2nd District representative)
  • Dean Asistio (Caloocan City 3rd District)
  • Marivic Co-Pillar (Quezon City 6th District)

The couple also cited several DPWH officials allegedly involved:

  • Eduarte Virgilio (Region V)
  • Ramon Arriola III (Unified Project Management Office)
  • Henry Alcantara (Bulacan 1st District Engineering Office)
  • Robert Bernardo (Undersecretary)
  • Aristotle Ramos (Metro Manila 1st District Engineering Office – Pasig City)
  • Manny Bulusan (North Manila District Engineering Office)
  • Edgardo C. Pingol (Bulacan Sub-District Engineering Office)
  • Michael Rosaria (DPWH Quezon 2nd District Engineering Office)

Despite the alleged reduction in funds due to kickbacks, the Discayas maintained that their company completed the projects according to approved plans and that these passed DPWH inspections.

Following their testimony, the couple sought protection from the Senate and from President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., expressing willingness to serve as state witnesses in any corruption case that may arise from the investigation.

Several of the officials named have either denied the allegations or have yet to issue formal statements as of press time. The Senate inquiry into the alleged flood control anomalies remains ongoing.

“Ano ‘to? Exam ng Grade 3!” Sinagot ni Escudero si Joel Chua

0

Nagpahayag si SP Chiz Escudero ng kanyang saloobin hinggil sa impeachment complaint laban sa Vice President at ang mga kontrobersiya ng mga demokratikong proseso na kasangkot dito.

Ayon kay Escudero, iniiwasan ng Senado ang ideya ng special session para magdiskusyon. “Hindi ito isa sa mga bagay na dahilan para magpatawag ng special session ng Senado,” ani niya.

Tinukoy din niya ang mga pirma at ang seryosong pagsusuri sa mga ito upang tiyakin ang legalidad ng impeachment complaint. “Wala namang ibang dokumento o batas ang magpoprotekta sa pirma ng mga individual. Na-verify na ang lahat ng 215 wet signature,” aniya.

Pinaalalahanan naman ng SP ang mga miyembro ng Senado na magsasagawa ng patas na paglilitis. “It’s just a process, no more and no less,” nakasaad sa kanyang pahayag.

Aanyayahan niya ang Vice President na humarap, kung siya man ay kailangan o nais magpaliwanag sa Senate Impeachment Court, kapag isagawa na pagkatapos ng SONA sa buwan ng Hunyo.

__________

Narito ang ilang highlights sa video:

“Noong nagdaang Linggo, nabigyan na ng kopya ng impeachment complaint ang mga miyembro ng Senado. Na-upload na rin sa website ng Senado ang actual na impeachment complaint, kabilang ang mga annex nito. Kinokonsidera ko itong public document, at marapat lamang na maging publiko. Hindi naman ito private crime na dapat limitado lamang ang makakakita o makakabasa.

“Sir, na-verify na ba ang mga signature? Sabi kasi, che-check visually.”

“Na-verify na ang lahat ng 215 signatures na wet signature. Tiningnan ‘yan ng hindi bababa sa apat na tao, ng hindi bababa sa dalawang beses kada tao. Pero dagdag doon, nagpo-problema pa rin sila para further validate. Pero ang initial na repaso nito, using visual perusal, wet signature lahat ng 215.”

“Bakit kailangan gawin ‘yan? Wala bang presumption of regularity? After all, it was sent by the House.”

“Meron, pero ayoko naman ding masisi kami na hindi namin ginampanan ang napakasimpleng tungkulin namin. Simple lang naman ang trabaho namin: tingnan kung wet signature nga ‘yun, dahil dapat verified ‘yun sa harap ng Secretary General. At tingnan kung ang 205 pirma o higit sa 1/3 ay mga kongresista nga ba talaga o hindi.

“Tinanggap naman na talaga namin ang verified complaint. Again, we can only make the corresponding recommendations to the impeachment court with respect to any such findings contrary to procedure. Walang karapatan o kapangyarihan ang Secretary General na magdesisyon tungkol dito. Ministerial lang ang trabaho ng Secretary General. He is simply doing his due diligence work in order to report or give a complete report to the Senate plenary.”

“Sir, nasa kanila na ang copy. Magpapatawag ka ng special session?”

“Layo naman ng talon mo. I have already said, I have no intentions of requesting the President for a special session. Hindi ito isa sa mga bagay na dahilan para magpatawag ng special session ng Senado. Dagdag pa, sino bang may gusto na mag-special session kami at magtalo? Sino ba humihiling noon? Sabi ko na, sino mang pro o anti, hindi namin papakinggan. Susundin namin kung ano ang itinatakda ng batas.”

“Pero babalikan ko, ang impeachment ni dating Ombudsman Merceditas Gutierrez, tatlong araw lang sinumite sa Senado bago kami nag-umpisa ng trial. Pagkatapos ng recess, mahigit isang buwan mula sa araw na iyon, nag-umpisa ang impeachment trial ng yumaong Chief Justice Corona noong December 13. Isang linggo bago mag-recess ang Senado, hindi lamang tatlong araw. Isang linggo, pero hindi nagtalaga ang Senado. Nag-umpisa lang pagkatapos ng recess ng Pasko at New Year, at tinawag ang pagdinig noong January, makalipas ang humigit-kumulang isang buwan.”

“Bakit ko iibahin ang pagtrato dito sa impeachment complaint na ito? Hindi ito espesyal. Hindi ito kakaiba. Ang tingin dapat namin dito, ordinaryong impeachment complaint lamang laban sa isang impeachable officer. Pare-pareho lamang silang impeachable officer sa pananaw namin—presidente man, vice presidente, ombudsman, chief justice, o ibang impeachable officer.

“Walang dahilan para mag-iba kami ng pagtrato dito. Baka mapagbintangan pa kami o maakusahan na iniiba ito dahil espesyal ito, dahil minamadali namin ito. Ordinaryo lamang ang pagtrato namin dito. Pinakamagandang ebidensya at batayan na kami magiging patas para dito.”

“Bakit nila inupuan ang dalawang buwan? Dalawang buwang nakabinbin ang tatlong impeachment complaint sa Senado… ah sa Kongreso. Ang kailangan lamang namang gawin, ipadala ‘yan sa Speaker para ma-agenda ng Speaker ‘yan. Magkatabi ang opisina nilang dalawa, pero hindi ‘yun ginawa sa loob ng dalawang buwan. Tapos kami, gusto sa loob ng dalawang oras magawa ‘yun? Sa loob ng ilang araw magawa ‘yun? Kung tila hindi sila nagmadali, anong pinaghuhugutan at saan sila nanggagaling para madaliin kami ngayon? Hindi naman niya kailangang sagutin talaga kung gusto lang niya, para lang maliwanagan din ako.”

“Sir, how could the Senate ensure a fair trial for the Vice President, given that some senators have already given their position that they will vote against her? Well, aren’t we starting on the right foot by treating it like any other impeachment complaint?”

“That’s a good start, I believe. Now, with respect to those who are voicing out their position, I would like to remind them once again and admonish them once again to kindly refrain from doing so in order to maintain and keep the impeachment court itself and the process fair, without any prejudgment on the part of any member of the Senate, for or against impeachment.”

“Ano-ano po ang mga items na kailangan niyo pang ayusin o i-submit, like pretrial briefs, halimbawa, para hindi mag-aksaya ng panahon?”

“Kung nanaisin nila na gawin lahat ng mga kailangan gawin, to take proper order of the subject of impeachment, kabilang na ang pagpapasagot sa nasasakdal, ang pagpapayag ng pretrial briefs na maisagawa na, upang sa gayon, pagpasok ng bagong Senado ng 20th Congress, ay talagang dire-diretso na sa trial, at wala nang pag-antala pa na kailangan nating antabayanan.”

“Pwede bang magtanong? Kung tatawid ng 20th Congress, malayang pwede may magtanong. Pero anong gusto nilang gawin namin? Finish or not finish, pass your paper? Ano ‘to, exam ng grade 3? Hindi pa tapos mag-presenta ng testigo ang prosecution at depensa, dahil June 30 na? O pagbotohan na natin ‘to? Oo, dismiss na natin ‘to? Hindi naman siguro ‘yun ang intensyon ng Saligang Batas. Ang intensyon marahil, dapat dumating sa punto na ang kaso ay matatapos, resolbahan, at pagpapasahan, hindi ‘yung bitin-bitin palagi.”

“Pangalawa, nabigay ko na sa inyo ang halimbawa ng mga collegial courts. Dahil ito ay hindi trabaho ng lehislasyon, ito ay trabaho ng isang impeachment court. So hinalintulad ko na ‘yan sa Court of Appeals, sa Supreme Court, sa Sandiganbayan—mga collegial courts. Kahit nga sa ordinaryong RTC, nagpalit ng judge, tuloy naman ang kaso. Bibigyan ko kayo ng isa pang halimbawa: ‘yung mga kaso sa Senate Electoral Tribunal. Tumatawid ito ng susunod na Kongreso, bagaman nagpalit ang mga mahistrado ng Korte Suprema sa SET, bagaman nagpalit ang membership ng Senado dahil tumawid sa panibagong Kongreso, tuloy-tuloy din ang kaso doon, at hindi kailangan i-dismiss dahil lamang pumasok ang panibagong Kongreso.”

“Maging ganon pa man, ito ang unang beses na mangyayari ito. May karapatan sino man mag-question. Pero tulad ng sinabi ko, hangga’t walang ruling ang Korte Suprema, gagawin namin kung ano ang tingin naming tama kaugnay sa paglilitis na ito.”

“Sir, kung okay na po sa inyo ang rules, kailangan pa ba itong i-approve ng Senado?”

“Yes, at depende kung ano ang nakapaloob sa impeachment rules. Ngayon kasi, parang ang ine-expect namin, at least kaya nga oo, pero kahit nga makuha na natin ang photo op na ‘yon, anong gagawin namin? Wala pa rin naman kasing sagot. Remember, we have session days when we resume. We have session days from June 2. We have 28 days left, including Saturdays and Sundays. ‘Yung period pa nga lang ng exchange of pleadings, ubos na ang June 30.”

“When ‘yung convening as an impeachment court, the process has already started. As of today, as of February 5, the Vice President was already impeached. She is an impeached Vice President already. That’s the beginning of the process. The process has begun. So ano pang hinahanap niyo sa proseso? Picture-picture lang ba ang gusto niyo? Wala namang kinalaman ‘yun sa proseso. Kaya nga darating ‘yan, it will come, pero hindi naman ‘yan minamadali dahil lamang gusto niyo ng photo op. Hindi naman ganoon ‘yan.”

“June 30, again, hindi mangyayari hanggang June 30 o after. Depende nga sa rules na aaprubahan namin. Pero kung ako tatanungin niyo, wala pang trial. Ayoko nang pangunahan.”

“Walang gagawin ang court mismo. Remember, a court is convened once it is ready to receive evidence. All of these will come in the reception of evidence after the pretrial procedures are completed. Wala pang actual reception of evidence.”

“Pero sir, ‘yung pag hindi pa kayo nakapag-convene, parang hindi pa uulitin ‘yung filing ng articles?”

“Hindi, hindi. Saan naman galing ‘yun? Wala naman. Ano na nga ba sinabi ko sa iyo? Hindi porke’t magpapalit ng Kongreso, dismiss lahat ng pending na kaso. Kasama ko lang nga kanina, ‘yung SET na mismo, Senado na mismo ‘yun. Tumatawid ‘yun. Walang debate, wala naman nagrereklamo. ‘Yun, kaso din ‘yun, hindi legislative ‘yon.”

“Sabi naman ni Vice President, hindi daw siya a-attend. Baka daw kayo ma-intimidate.”

“She is free to say what she wants to say. I doubt if that will happen. I myself am not intimidated. She’s free to say what she wants, but if she needs to attend, we will make her attend. If she doesn’t need to attend, we won’t force her because that’s her right to waive her right to appear, unless it is necessary or needed.”

“And if she attends, how will she be treated? I mean, ‘yung protocol? She’s still the Vice President. It depends. She will attend as what? As a witness? Uupo siya sa witness stand, pwede siyang i-cross examine. Hindi siya pwedeng testigong ito lang ang sabihin ko, ayoko ka na magsalita pagkatapos nito. Hindi pwede ‘yun. Any direct testimony must be subject to cross-examination before it is considered admissible. Pwede siyang magsalita kung gusto niya, pero kung hindi siya magpapa-cross-examine, may karapatang i-strike ‘yung testimonyang iyon.”

“Will she attend as a spectator? Will she attend as a lawyer, lawyering for herself? It depends on what capacity she will attend, and she will be accorded the treatment depending on the capacity that she will be attending as. If as a lawyer, then she will sit with all the other lawyers. If as a witness, she will sit in the witness stand. If as a mere spectator, not part of the legal team, she will sit in the gallery—most likely, VIP gallery. Why will we not accord respect not only to her but to her office? Of course, we will.”

Follow us on our social media:
📺www.youtube.com/@PinasNews
👉www.facebook.com/pinasnewstv

Mabigat na hatol kay Sara Duterte ang gustong ihatol ni Joel Chua

0

Nilinaw ni Senate President Escudero na hindi siya sang-ayon sa pagtawag ng special session para sa impeachment trial, at binigyang-diin na hindi dapat madaliin ang proseso.

“Hwag daw silang madaliin kasi kayo naman po hindi rin daw po kayo nagmadali doon sa impeachment complaint,” pahayag ng reporter.

Sa kabilang banda, iginiit ni Cong. Joel Chua na mula sa House of Representatives na “dahil ang Senado ay isang continuing body, kahit simulan ito sa 19th Congress, puwede pa rin itong ituloy sa 20th Congress.”

Sinabi pa rin ni Chua na malakas ang ebidensya laban kay Vice President Sara Duterte para sa kanyang posibleng pagkakasala sa Articles 2 at 3. “Ako po naniniwala malakas po ang ebidensya para po siya ay ma-convict dito sa impeachment,” dagdag pa niya.

Binanggit din ng mambabatas na ang impeachment ay hindi kagaya ng kriminal na kaso na nangangailangan ng proof beyond reasonable doubt.

Dagdag pa niya, “Ang impeachment po kasi ay hindi kagaya ng criminal case na kailangan ng proof beyond reasonable doubt. Ayon po kay Justice Isagani Cruz, “Ang impeachment daw is a method of national inquest into the conduct of public men.” 

Kaya ang tinitignan dito ay ang conduct ng mga opisyal, lalo na ang mga impeachable officers. Base po sa mga ebidensya, kasama na ang live video kung saan nag-threaten siya sa ating Pangulo, First Lady, at Speaker, malakas po ang kaso.”

Samantala, tinalakay din ang posibilidad na mag-resign si Duterte bago o habang nagpapatuloy ang trial. “Kung siya po ay mag-resign in advance, ang pagre-resign niya ay nareresolba lang ang removal, pero hindi yung disqualification,” paliwanag pa rin ni Chua.

Follow us on our social media:
📺www.youtube.com/@PinasNews
👉www.facebook.com/pinasnewstv

Senior Citizen, buhay pero idineklarang patay sa PhilHealth records

0

Nabigla ang isang 73-anyos na senior citizen nang ideklarang patay sa mga record ng PhilHealth habang buhay at aktibong nagtatrabaho.

Nangyari ito habang nagre-renew si Romeo Bilbar ng kanyang medical clearance sa Manila Development Authority (MMDA) clinic, kung saan siya empleyado.

Humiling ng tulong si Romeo sa Kapuso Action Man ng GMA para maayos ang isyu.

Agad na kumilos ang programa at nakipag-ugnayan sa PhilHealth Regional Office-NCR South Branch.

Nagpahayag ng paumanhin ang PhilHealth, “We would like to apologize for the inconvenience caused Mr. Bilbar regarding the incident. Upon verification with our membership database, the status of his membership is ‘Active’ as Direct Contributor-Self Earning Individual-Under the Group Enrollment Scheme of the Metropolitan Manila Development Authority.” Naayos na ang kanyang record, at maaari na niyang magamit muli ang kanyang mga benepisyo.

Sinabi ni Romeo, “Hirap tanggapin nabuhay pa ako tapos pinapatay ako ng isang ahensya.” Hinikayat ang publiko na magsumite ng reklamo sa Kapuso Action Man Facebook page para sa mga katulad na isyu.

Tiniyak ng PhilHealth na maaari nang magpatuloy si Romeo sa kanyang Konsulta registration nang hindi maaapektuhan ang kanyang mga benepisyo.

Follow us on our social media:
📺www.youtube.com/@PinasNews
👉www.facebook.com/pinasnewstv